My company would love to be able to use this feature, but we are on SSO and it sounds like at this point that is not possible
While this is available on the browser, as someone who converts projects using project templates on a regular basis, I was under the impression I could do so on the app. Recently, I discovered I cannot. Due to the flexibility and availability required in my job, and the fact this feature is available otherwise, I think I should just be added into the app with the already available project conversion capabilities. Currently, I can only convert without a project template and I run into issues bringing over the information from my custom forms as well, while using the app.
I'd love to be able to report on objects in the recycle bin. Not the objects associated with them, but the object itself. So projects existing in the recycle bin, tasks, etc.
Description - Currently it's only available to system admins or the other option is to give it to everyone. Our organization instance is setup by groups due to security and privacy. It would be great to have this option available to all group admins.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Integation of Adobe photoshop with AEM Use-case: Teams can use it to design assets and design files and also have an ability to share it with diiferent team and instances , This also helps manage business designs and revisions. to have direct connect with xd on the product to access number of assets project wise. Current/Experienced Behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHjRk7dw9rI Improved/Expected Behavior: To have not just assets customization, to also have page level similar xd. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Description - Add ability to have / transfer ownership of reports Why is this feature important to you - The ownership of a report currently exists only by who entered a report. Often the report was written for a person/team but even when a person leaves the company they still are listed as the owner because they created it. As a result new reports are often created that are the same as other reports How would you like the feature to work - Add a Report Owner field in Report Settings. They then have the rights (provided their license gives it) that the person who entered the report had. Current Behaviour - Only have an entered by
Description - Filters for the Workload Balancer do not stay locked when we would like to target them on different team dashboards. It instead saves the last used filter by that user for all dashboards that have the balancer on them. Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to have filters stay "sticky" when they are targeted to a dashboard. We have built many dashboards for different creative teams, but we cannot effectively use them as the filters do not stay targeted on that page and always divert to the last filter that was used across the board by that user. This makes it very confusing for our users and they have to continually switch the filters to get the view they would like. How would you like the feature to work - Once a filter is created, Workfront should create a unique URL link. Or if this is not possible, could the balancer act like a report and be added to a dashboard as an object? Current Behaviour - We currently use the link to add the balancer to dashboards, but since the link is not unique enough it reverts to what was last used/filtered on the balancer page.
Hello, I wanted to share an idea of having an automatic time tracker per project. If there could be a way to add time tracked as a base work time tracked per projects once they get opened. For example, add 1.5 Hrs. as a base time track to each project as soon we open them, since we would like start charging a base standard fee to open and manage each project. Maybe can that be something we could add in one of the tasks in the task list templates thank you!
Description: Workfront uses the Event Subscription API to transmit changes to our services when a document in created or updated on a project. Currently, when a file is moved (drag-and-drop) from one folder to another, it does not fire any event to indicate that this action occurred. The argument i got from support was that this just "changes the folderID field 'on' a document", and that their product was functioning as intended. However, changing the folder ID for a document is in fact a change TO the document, as you are changing critical information associated directly with the document. In computers, a file/document always exists within a folder. When you change where the document lives, in computer operating systems and workfront, it is always done by doing operations on the file icon itself, or specifying the file's path and/or name. Thus, it makes sense that changing the folder a document is in should be an notable enough be considered an "UPDATE" event in the Events Subscription API. Why is this feature important to you: This feature will be used heavily by the Marketing department at our University. Documents will be initially created in a "Campaign Notes" folder, and will later need to be transferred into a "Finalized Files" folder. After the transfer to Finalized Files, an event should be fired to our services that downloads said folder into storage in our University's infrastructure. It is necessary that an event fires to signify that an existing file was moved into that folder. How would you like the feature to work: When any document is drag-and-dropped between folders in a Workfront project, a Document UPDATE event should be sent using the Event Subscription API described in following link: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/adobe-workfront-api/event-subscriptions/event-subs-api.html?lang=en Current Behaviour: Currently, UPDATE events are only sent when a new version is uploaded from an external source, and CREATE is only sent when a new document is uploaded from an external source. As an upload is simply a "move" operation from an external source into workfront, I'm not sure why the same logic wouldn't apply to fire an event for "moves" of the file within workfront, also.
Form submit button is activated when Date-Time-my.token-Based is system date.
Description - Request Link Why is this feature important to you - Creates efficiencies around getting requests and briefs from our external contacts How would you like the feature to work - I want to be able to send the "share path" link on a request over to an external contact and it direct them to the correct log-in page Current Behaviour - Currently the link sends them to my company's internal single sign on page instead of their log-in page
Following the implementation of autosave, it would be advisable to include the possibility of enabling and disabling it if necessary, preferably directly within the WS project. It is very important to add this functionality: 1) to avoid modifying scheduled or shared reports during presentations by mistake; 2) to avoid saving many copies of the same report; 3) to avoid making continuous report switches between the original and the copy in case of live changes during a presentation.
Marketo offer to the functionality to publish the pages to Facebook. However as this social platform are becoming less relevant for some B2B clients it would be great to have this functionality for other channels like LinkedIn. We should reach to more audience in more channels.
We use calendars to show project go-live activities along with Change Freeze Windows and important (Executive Interest) tasks. The Calendars should have the ability to "Add Holidays" to the calendar directly from the user's schedule or the calendar creators selected schedule. It should be in the calendar option Add to Calendar so I can select which color the holidays show up in. It should be in the Advanced Options where you can show Tasks, Projects, Issues and Time Off - there should be one more option (Holidays). In there, you should be able to add Holidays from a particular schedule or best option, show Holidays for the $$USER.ID Schedule.
Description Currently, you can turn off, make daily digest only, make instant only, or make daily digest& instant notifications for email. However, you cannot customize what notifications you see in app independent of the email notifications. For example, it would be beneficial to my users to be able to say they want instant email notifications when they are directly tagged in an update, but only in app notifications for updates on threads they were previously tagged into. Why is this feature important to you Enabling this feature will allow users to cut down on the noise of notifications more efficiently and sustainably. Especially for our project management team who receive notifications on multiple projects at once. Previous Ideas request There is a request from 2017 that was put in by @ericma and it has many updates on it but Support has asked me to put in a new Idea request so I have. How would you like the feature to work: All communication types that are available via email will also need to be available via in-app notification (currently only Work-list and announcement are available via in-app as per Workfront Support) All email notifications have the options of a combination of daily or instant including turning them off completely or having both enabled. Adding a third option for in-app would allow users to decide where they are notified for each communication type. Current Behaviour: As per my support case # 00341694, the current behavior as identified by your support team is as follows: The in-app notification feature contains two types of information. Work-list and announcement. The work-list notification can be governed by the email-notification customization but will also impact the email notification.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow "READ" operations using the Adobe Experience Manager Assets HTTP API without requiring "WRITE" access Use-case: Users who are not given write access should still be able to fetch asset data using the Assets HTTP API even if they don't have WRITE access Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, if a user only has read-only access, he or she is not able to use the read functions of the assets API Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide the flexibility to be able to use the API while only having a read access Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Prequire Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Mobile Scorecards is such a great feature/tool, but unfortunately we can't roll it out across out business because we have 200+ websites and there wouldn't be an option for the recipients to view reports isolated to their websites. How would you like the feature to work - Simple option for user to select Report Suites from pre-defined list specified in the configuration of the scorecard. Current Behaviour - No option to filter report on report suite.
Many teams that we have worked with are in hopes that they are able to select a portfolio or program field when submitting a request. This would allow the resolving project to be placed automatically into the portfolio or program when it is converted to a project. It would save teams time when the requestor already knows what portfolio or program to put it in. Note: In many cases for marketing teams the program or portfolio objects are their campaigns and would allow tactics/deliverables to be placed easily into the correct campaign or bucket.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - It would be great if images could be uploaded in response to questions/content on a custom form. We have many situations where we're uploading documents solely because they have creative in the documents section, but it would make more sense logically to upload them in a response on a custom form. How would you like the feature to work - When creating or editing a custom form admin's would have an option add an image option that would allow users completing the form to respond with an image. Current Behaviour - when a custom form is being used as a request there is an option to add documents, but that option does not exist when creating a task or project custom form.
Description - Many times when I attempt troubleshooting problems in Workfront, I find I need to look up information from a few months back. And, of course I attempt to do just this and I can't. Ultimately, there should be at least 90 days worth of historical data. Why is this feature important to you - I can't troubleshoot problems if I don't have the information. How would you like the feature to work - Just like now, but 90 days instead of 30. Current Behaviour - 60 days less of historical data than what I need.
It would be great to be able to copy and/or move a card between Workfront Boards. Currently you can only move them to a different column within the same board.
Hiya!I've noticed some automated anti-spam checkers have been clicking links many times automatically causing the lead score for some of our leads to be over-inflated and disingenuous; it's causing them to hit MQL stage way before they are actually at that point.A way to prevent this would be to restrict the number of times a lead can pass through a campaign for a certain time frame, however Marketo's smallest unit for time is hours. This poses a problem as it is plausible for a lead to engage with an email link or social app button more than once within an hour time frame. I did attempt to use decimal points (i.e. every 0.5 hours) however the format could not be saved.Could Marketo please consider adding in 'minutes' as an option to the available units. This will allow the lead to be restricted from passing through the flow for an interval smaller than one hour, but prevent them from running through 10--20 times within one minute as has been happening with some of our leads. Cheers,Brooke
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Language Navigation should match the expected language code "id_ID" for Indonesian (Bahasa). Use-case: Language Navigation displaying incorrect language code for Indonesian (Bahasa). Current/Experienced Behavior: Language code displayed is "in_ID" or "in" which does not match the expected language code "id_ID" Improved/Expected Behavior: Language code displayed should be "id_ID" or "id" Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM S3 connector support for SSE-C Use-case: For protection of customer data, encryption in transit and at rest is required. Some data stored in S3, requires the use of customer managed, customer provided keys. This provides an extra level of security through separation of duties, as one team/role can manage the keys, while another team/role can use the provided keys for encryption of the data. Currently, AEM S3 connection supports only two of the valid encryption options for S3 server-side encryption. SSE-C encryption is needed to allow for that separation of duties. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM S3 connector currently supports SSE-S3 and SSE-KMS, but not SSE-C (customer managed, customer provided keys) Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM S3 connector would support all 3 encryption options Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP 13+ Customer-name/Organization name: US Government Customer Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Restrict IP access for ingress integration that use Service Credentials on AEMasCS author without putting the whole environment behind vpn Use-case: The third-party connector leverages Service Credentials to access AEM as a cloud Author. It uses POST and Sling Post requests for updates in AEM. We want to make sure that if the credentials are compromised, nobody would be able to make any updates to the production environment from IPs that are not whitelisted. While the environment should be still publicly accessible. Current/Experienced Behavior: No IP restrictions per Service Credentials/Integration Improved/Expected Behavior: It is possible to restrict the access for the integrations per IP Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Macys Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
