Skip to main content

Ideas

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

Lightroom AI Generative fill to replace clone / heal toolNew

Why is this feature important to you?This feature is crucial to me because it would greatly improve my workflow and make creating proof galleries much easier and faster. The current cloning/healing tool in Lightroom is extremely ineffective and does a terrible job at cloning. Having the AI generative fill feature would allow me to effortlessly extend or fill areas of a photo, eliminating the frustrations and limitations of the current tool. How would you like the feature to work?Ideally, I would like the feature to function similarly to Photoshop. I envision being able to select a specific area using a marquee tool and then simply clicking a "generative fill" option to initiate the cloning or healing process. This would provide a seamless and efficient way to address areas that need editing. Current Behavior:Currently, the healing and cloning tool in Lightroom is far from satisfactory. Even when attempting to select and clone from a particular area, the results are poorly blended and look unprofessional. Additionally, the tool often lags, causing further frustration and hindering the editing process. Furthermore, the addition of this tool would significantly enhance my workflow by eliminating the need to open each individual image in Photoshop. This would be especially beneficial when I only require quick fills or edits for a proof gallery. The generative fill feature in Lightroom would allow me to accomplish these tasks efficiently within the program itself, saving me valuable time and effort.

Jennifer_Dungan
Adobe Champion and Community Advisor
Jennifer_DunganAdobe Champion and Community Advisor

Update Alert Recipients to use standard users / user group auto-suggest functionalityNew

Description -Inspired by this question: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/how-do-i-add-a-group-as-a-recepient-in-a-custome-alert/td-p/594492Unlike a lot of Adobe Interfaces since the Admin Console was created, to allow us to type in users or user groups, alerts doesn't appear to have this functionality... Well it partially does... when I create a new alert, my own name is added a "standard" object.... but the user auto-suggest doesn't trigger. Since I don't see any errors in the console, or any network calls that would suggest any sort of "user lookup" is trying to occur. The Alerts feature should allow us to choose users within our system, or groups of users (based on permission groups) to send alerts to... rather than having to look up emails individually and manage large lists of users within the Alerts area separate from our Admin Console Groups. This would create a more cohesive, and easier to maintain infrastucture.  Why is this feature important to you -Being able to leverage users and user groups that are configured in Admin Console would save us a lot of management time... lets say today we have 20 users getting alerts, and we have 100 alerts.... if we need to add a single user to all those alerts, and remove 3 users as they have left the company (or just changed positions making the alerts no longer relevant to them)... We still have to manage the user groups in Admin Console.. then we have to update 100 alerts, one at a time to remove the three users, and add the 1.... If the alert was tried to the user groups... making the one change there would automatically update all 100 alerts through virtue of the User Group configuration   How would you like the feature to work -Similar to how workspaces allows you to share reports based on individual users, or to select a User Group through an auto-suggest interface (using the users and groups from the Admin Console configurations to be selected), so too should alerts. When a user group is selected, the Alerts should send to all users in that group. Since the group is considered one entity, this may require that the "Opt out of this schedule" may need to be suppressed, with a message that your should contact your admin to change the group settings. Current Behaviour -While your own user looks like a standard option from Admin Console when creating a new alert, no other users seem to be able to be added this way... Only emails seem to be accepted... as there is no user auto-suggest, and even if you match the exact spelling of specific user names / groups, they aren't accepted here.

MRM_RCLevel 2

// Adobe Target Idea - Adding Comments when Saving //New

Hi Adobe Team,Please find my feature suggestion below: Description -Add a "Comment" prompt every time a Target Activity is saved to help be able to document changes in a Target ActivityWhy is this feature important to you - This feature would be extremely helpful for documentation purposes; Yes many users utilize secondary ticketing systems or spreadsheets to help manage information, but I find that Adobe Target (being the source of truth) should be able to document changes in the activity from a different angle. There are description fields in the Goals & Settings, but those aren't viewable unless you actually open the ticket, and often are forgotten to be updated.How would you like the feature to work -Every time you save an Activity, before being able to save a user would be prompted with a Comment text field to add a small comment about what was done, which would then be displayed on the Change Log panel in Adobe Target (see example screenshot I created below):This field should be text only and could be somewhat limited in character length if need be.Every time you save a Target Activity, you should be prompted to add a comment (although it could be marked as an optional field if some users find they do not want to organize this way).Current Behaviour -Currently the only way to document text information is by opening an activity and navigating to the Goals & Settings panel Please note this was previously posted in the Questions section of the Adobe Target Community and it was recommended that I add the post here.  (OG post:  https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-idea-adding-comments-when-saving/m-p/592886#M8960) Thanks for your time!RC

sg-3Level 2

Marketo -Salesforce integration - RollbackNew

hi, We have accidently connected a Salesforce sandbox instance to Marketo and it is now NOT possible to rollback.   If there is any rollback steps or help to disconnect Salesforce from Marketo it will be very helpful. Talked to Marketo support and they are saying we need to get a new instance, but that comes with a caveat of lot of issues.   Any Suggestions/product features that can help us to resolve this unwanted Salesforce integration? Help appreciated.   thanks -Sree   Getting a new instance will cause these problems which is not desirable at all. 1. Lead Database records, field-level data, and activity history are not copied2. CRM configuration is reset.3. Users are not copied.4. CRM Field Mappings are removed except for standard mappings and must be set during the Field Mapping Stage of CRM sync initialization.5. RCA (Advanced Report Builder), SEO, ABM (Target Account Manager), and Web Personalization information is not copied. These settings would need to be manually re-established.6. Program Subscriptions are not copied except Marketo Program Library.7. Campaign History is not copied. All Smart Campaigns copy deactivated and unscheduled.8. CNAMEs for Email links and LPs are not copied.9. All Account-string based properties are modified accordingly.10. Munchkin ID of the destination instance is preserved.11. Sales Insight Admin Configuration is reset.12. Outlook and Gmail plugin licenses are reset.13. When in doubt all permanent configuration settings which can be done to a Marketo instance are reset to the pre-configuration stage.14. All existing data in the instance will be destroyed (this includes the lead database)15. Asset IDs will match the source instance16. All fields in the source instance will be copied over to the destination instance.  

DavidLu17Level 3

Formatting options for figure legend labelsNew

I often have figures with complex labels, often with long-winded names based on variables I have no control over.For example, in this chart (screenshot below), the main metric is Revenue, but there are filters for marketing tactic and a note on the non-standard attribution model (it can get worse than this!). The figure labels in the legend are concatenated from all elements. But the chart is already titled with what it's showing, so I edit all the legend labels to remove the redundant factors for simplicity and clarity. E.g.,  Revenue [Marketing Tag Tactic: SEM] (U Shaped | 90 Days) --> SEM Changing the metric, model, or filters causes the labels to reset to the full names, so you have to edit them all again - it's very tedious, especially when the UI response is slow, like it is today.Can we have a master legend configurator in the chart settings that allows you to choose which component elements to include or omit in the figure labels? E.g. [ ] Metric[ ] Attribution[x] Filter 1 Would give you these legends: Marketing Tag Tactic: SEM, Marketing Tag Tactic: Banner, etc. Better but still redundant. Ideally, you'd be able to edit the label prefixes in the master selector too, e.g., given this selector UI, where the text was editable, [ ] Revenue[ ] (U Shaped | 90 Days)[ ] [Marketing Tag Tactic: {Filter 1 Value}] you could change it to this and update all the labels at once: [ ] Revenue[ ] (U Shaped | 90 Days)[x] {Filter 1 Value} So your labels would be SEM, Banner, etc.