Build better products with our product team
Models API (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/target-dev/developer/api/models-api/models-api) currently allows getting a list fi features that make up models for AP/AT activities. While it works for activity-level, would be beneficial to get the list of all features across an organisation so that we can block unwanted features globally.For mature organisations that use many AP/AT activities, its difficult to identify features as part of an activity and then block those globally. Getting list of all features in one single API response will help saving time.
Description - We would love to be able to freeze columns in a workfront report Why is this feature important to you - while teams need all columns, they want to be able to quickly view key columns that change priority quickly and easily How would you like the feature to work - be able to turn on and off freezing easily and adjust which column freezes Current Behaviour - we are aware of creating separate views, but freezing would work much better for the users
Think Excel. It would be great to be able to freeze the first column (or columns even) if you have a report with lots of columns. That way you could horizontally scroll, but keep the important column(s) at the beginning and frozen as you scroll over. Also if you fix that horrible breaking when there a too many columns, that would be awesome as well.
Description - Currently, delegated assignees are emailed once to notify them they are assigned as a delegated person. It does not send real-time notifications each time an approval is sent to the original person. It should reroute the approval request and email to the delegated. Why is this feature important to you - Requesters are not always checking their widgets. Without notifications, you're asking the requester to check in Workfront like a hawk to know if a new approval was sent. How would you like the feature to work - Notifications should be sent in real-time much like they do for a normal document or proof approval. Send the notification to the delegated person that there is a document that needs their review and decision. Current Behaviour - One email is sent at the time of the delegation. The original person is then out of office. The production teams send approval requests and the delegated person does not get notifications or emails of new approvals.
Description - It would be ideal if you were to specify, at project template level, that planned hours can be front or rear loaded (in addition to being spread evenly across the task duration) when assigned to a user. Why is this feature important to you - This would help our project managers to schedule resource more accurately, it will allow them to schedule tasks on the same day, get get the most for the available resource on a granular level. The assignees would also benefit, they can concentrate on one task at a time, moving onto the next once the fist has finished. How would you like the feature to work - If a task has a two day duration and 8 planned hours and is assigned to a user who has a capacity of 7 hours per day, WF would allocate 7 hours in day 1 and 1 hour in day two. The task would be set to start at 9am and finish at 5pm which is inline with our default schedule. If the assignee has 2 hours available on day 1 and 7 available in day 2, the task would be spread accordingly, 2 and 6 hours. If an assignee has less than the required amount of capacity across the 2 day duration, an error message should be displayed when trying to assign the task or they are not available to assign when selecting. (similar to the plane icon when they are on leave during the task duration. If the assignee has a different schedule, eg they start at 11am, the task will schedule to start at that time rather than 9am, the same would be done if the assignee has a task finishing at 3pm on day 1. Current Behaviour - Currently the above is a manually process and has to be adjusted on each task as WF distributes the planned hours evenly across the duration days.
Would the community consider if having the ability to break down marketing planning activities into %age attributions for tactics as something that would be useful for WF Planning to be able to do. As an example If a campaign is planned to be target various industries, or effect specific geographies, or to support a subset of your companies products, to be able to show what your %age split across those attributes. I.E. and event is planned to be held in London but is aimed at specific industries where you expect attendance to be split Industry A = xx% Industry B = yy% industry C = zz% Where XX+YY+ZZ will always = 100% Being in London you may expect a split in attendees to come for various geographies the largest being Local and from the UKUK = 60% of audience France = 15% Germany = 20% Nordic = 10% Benelux = 10%There is no method currently in WF Planning to split attribution in Marketing Planning. Could the community see a benefit in having this type of capability within the tool?
Description - Ability to export custom forms into an excel formatWhy is this feature important to you - Users often ask to export information on projects into excel format for analysis on fields and / or for presentation purposes. How would you like the feature to work - Export the custom form from the admin view including field name, field description, and field display logic. Also export a filled out custom form on a project / task / issue with the field values for end users.Current Behaviour - Custom forms can only be exported in PDF format. The PDF is not presentation ready and is hard to navigate. Users can not easily copy / paste from the PDF or use the data in analysis.
Unified Approval Improvement Request: There is a need for more options surrounding email notification settings for unified approvals. It would be helpful to have the option to only be notified via email when a final decision has been made on a document approval workflow. Currently you can only turn on or off ALL email notifications for document approvals. If turned on all activity is sent via email resulting in too many unhelpful emails.
Document Approval Workflow improvement request: Allow admin to set default approval roles for users who are designated recipients in a document approval workflow. As of now every user added to a workflow is defaulted as an approver. It would be helpful to have the option to change that to reviewer.
Description:We need a feature to filter out automatic email open events that are not caused by recipients or users. This would enable more accurate reporting and evaluation of email campaign performance.Why is this feature important to you:Filtering out non-human interactions is essential for providing accurate open rate metrics, ensuring campaign performance insights reflect genuine user engagement. Additionally, identifying and including non-human interactions (e.g., automatic opens by Apple Mail Privacy Protection - MPP) would help evaluate email address activity and inactivity more effectively.How would you like the feature to work:The feature should detect and exclude automatic opens caused by non-human actions, such as MPP or similar mechanisms, from standard open rate calculations. Simultaneously, it should log and make these automatic opens identifiable for separate reporting purposes, allowing for better analysis of email address activity patterns.Current Behaviour:Currently, all email opens, including those triggered automatically by non-human actions like MPP, are counted equally. This inflates open rates and makes it challenging to distinguish genuine user engagement from system-generated interactions.
Description - Workfront Dark Mode Why is this feature important to you - Default Workfront is incredibly straining on the eyes How would you like the feature to work - Provide a black or dark background instead of white Current Behaviour - Non-existent
Description - Would like to have the project names visible (but not clickable) in the My Approvals widget when the approver doesn’t have access to the project instead of saying “No Access” where the project title is listed.Why is this feature important to you - This would allow the approvers to know which project the approval is for. We work on parts and service content that needs to be reviewed by our service and engineering teams. Our project names are the parts or service section titles. Right now, we have to tag the approver in an update on the task telling them which parts and service content the approval is for. We use standardized tasks names on the project - Service Review, Engineering Review - so it can get confusing for the approvers to know which approval is for which project when they have 50+ approvals for tasks called Engineering Review. We don’t want to give approvers access to the full projects, so having the project name be visible would at least tell the approvers which approval is for which project.How would you like the feature to work - Show the project name and have it be unclickable instead of “No Access” in the My Approvals widget when the approver doesn’t have access to the project.Current Behavior: This does not exist.
Description - Would like to have a description area to be able to apply information about how a calendar to provide information regarding a calendarWhy is this feature important to you - This would be a place where information can be provided on how to use the intended calendar, simple instructions about the different views and to provide some information for admin governance needs.How would you like the feature to work - Add description area that can be seen at the top of the calendar or can be added to the left navigation panel.Current Behavior: This does not exist.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Our data engineering team is working to leverage system data using the API but cannot access everything they need without running reports.How would you like the feature to work - Same as all the other data. Accessible via API call.Current Behaviour - Reports are required to pull the data.
I really want to love and switch over to Priorities because the UI is beautiful and I love how user-friendly it is, but there are still a few must-haves missing for us:Selecting the task or project name does not display the attached custom form. It feels pretty click-heavy to have to select the project name and then click “Go to project” just to view the project details/custom form. The ability to set Priorities as a user’s default landing page. More admin/layout template controls for settings and configuration.Curious if others are feeling the same way or have found good workarounds.
Description - the current Web SDK "set-consent" behaves a little unexpected in different situations, leading to unwanted results, whereas a the legacy Visitor ID service behaved differently. Examples: A) A new visitor denies cookies. With the Visitor ID service, you would've just denied the consent categories, mapped to the Adobe tools without having any whatsoever cookie written. With the Web SDK however, if you send a general "opt out" through the "set-consent" action, two things happen "kndctr" cookies are set (!) if the company has a RT-CDP license, a pseudonymous profile is created (correct me if am wrong!) with the consent preferences attached to it In my opinion, none of the two above make sense, and cookies written lead to potential legal problems. Now, I am a seasoned Launch developer and have a workaround that involves local storage and some other constructs to make sure the "set-consent" rule only triggers (and writes cookies and creates a profile), when it is needed. I am wondering what happened to the super simple approach with the old Adobe optIn API. Why is this feature important to you - ease of use, legal compliance and cost control. If I don't consent, why does the Edge network return cookies. And when I am a new visitor without consent, why create a profile? How would you like the feature to work - Web SDK should send a set-consent call if a user previously consented and changed his settings e.g., now opts out. a user gives consent to be tracked ("collect") Web SDK should NOT send a set-consent call if the user has never consented and rejected all consent categories, resp. the "collect" category Current Behaviour - opt out with cookies stored on client side and needed workaround in place to disable Adobe tools and functionalities that were automatically handled through the Visitor ID Service in the past.
It would be nice to be able to alter or disable the information that populates on the right-hand side of the calendar when a Calendar object is selected. I would want to be able to adjust what external “public link” users vs. what internal Workfront users see as well
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Determining the content of zip files solely from their title or file name can be challenging. It would be beneficial if marketers could attach images to the zip files (for thumbnails), as this would enable quicker visual identification. Use-case: Visually identifying the content of a ZIP via a thumbnail Current/Experienced Behavior: All zip files has same generic thumbnail. Thus, marketers need to check read through Titles/names. Improved/Expected Behavior: Associate Image with a ZIP to identify contents by looking at the thumbnail Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5/Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Mondelez Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
First Touch Campaign: What It Is and How It Benefits Your Business A First Touch Campaign is a marketing strategy designed to create the initial interaction between a brand and a potential customer. In analytics terms, it represents the first marketing touchpoint that introduces users to a brand, product, or service.These campaigns are commonly executed through channels such as Google Ads, paid social, display ads, or organic discovery, and they play a critical role in first‑touch attribution analysis within platforms like Adobe Analytics and Customer Journey Analytics (CJA).The primary objectives of a First Touch Campaign are to:Build brand awareness Reach new or unknown users Create a positive first impression Initiate long‑term customer relationshipsBelow are examples of how First Touch Campaigns differ by industry.📈 eCommerce Industry – First Touch CampaignIn the eCommerce industry, urgency is often a key factor in the success of First Touch Campaigns. Consumers typically make faster purchase decisions, so timely and compelling offers work well.Example: A potential customer clicks on a paid search or display ad and lands on the retailer’s website. As part of the first interaction, the user is shown:A first‑purchase discount Free shipping A limited‑time site‑wide offerEcommerce Industry — First Touch CampaignFrom an analytics perspective, this campaign is often tracked as the first attribution touch that introduces the customer to the brand. A strong first impression helps increase engagement, conversion likelihood, and repeat visits.👷 B2B (Software Product Companies) – First Touch CampaignIn B2B software companies, the urgency of a First Touch Campaign depends on:Product complexity Market competition Business goalsThe sales cycle is usually longer, but the first interaction is still critical in moving users into the consideration stage.Example: A software company promoting a project management tool may use a First Touch Campaign offering:A free trial for a limited time Early access to premium features Event‑based promo codes for webinars or conferencesFrom an Adobe Analytics point of view, these campaigns help identify:Which channels introduce high‑quality leads How first‑touch interactions influence downstream funnel stages🤝 B2B (Service Providers, Manufacturers, Distributors)In traditional B2B service‑oriented industries—such as manufacturing, supply chain management, wholesalers, or distributors—the sales cycle is longer and often involves multiple stakeholders.Here, the goal of a First Touch Campaign is less about urgency and more about:Building trust Establishing credibility Educating potential clientsExample: Instead of discounts, the first interaction may focus on:Case studies Whitepapers Introductory consultationsIn analytics reporting, First Touch Campaigns in this space are valuable for understanding brand discovery, top‑of‑funnel engagement, and long‑term contribution across multi‑touch journeys.
When creating a user profile in Workfront, the option to automatically generate a proof when a document is uploaded should not be selected by default. Instead, this setting should be an optional, manual selection during user profile creation. Making this change would reduce confusion and help minimize troubleshooting tickets from end users who simply want to upload a document without initiating a proof.
We are on AEMaaCS, we are working on introducing msm in our experience fragment hierarchy, we have created an xf in language masters in /content/experience-fragments/myProject/language-masters/en/header, now as it happens in site pages when we roll out a page from language masters, it automatically creates a live copy in /content/myProject/en/en_US, but in case of xf we have to manually create a live copy using create button, is there a way to automate this like it is there in sites pages.
It would be good to have a Splunk Connector for Workfront and Splunk
In the old Report Builder, it was possible to set a "reference date" when refreshing a report. For example, you could configure the report to show "last month" and then decide at refresh time whether "last month" should be calculated from today or from an earlier date. In the new Report Builder, this feature seems to be missing or only possible through multiple formulas.It would be very helpful if we could reference a "reference date" from a cell, so that the report calculations (e.g., "last month") are based on the date specified in that cell. This would make it much easier to analyze data from different time perspectives without having to adjust multiple formulas.
Description:Add a way to be indicated that tasks are late on the My Tasks widget Why is this feature important to you:Users need an easy way to see that they are late on tasks. Currently, there is no indication with color or an icon letting them know that task(s) are late. The old home had a Late grouping and colored red which made it clear to pay attention to the tasks. Currently, with our team working by the hour, it is very easy to miss late tasks and puts our projects at more risk to meeting deadlines. How would you like the feature to work:3 options:1. Add red color to the background of the tasks and have them be shown at the top of the list for My Tasks widget 2. Add a caution icon (similar to team request tasks that are late) next to the due date of the task 3. Create a new "Late Tasks" widget so tasks live in their own space to make it quick and easy for users to find late items Current Behaviour - Does not exist in new home
Description - The current fields for Risks and issues is very limited, I want to be able to add custom fields for each Risk/Issue, currently there is no way to to that. Why is this feature important to you - If I cannot add fields then I have to track Risks and Issues in a spreadsheet. How would you like the feature to work - I should be able to create fields for Issues and Risks that will let me input unique information for each Risk. Current Behaviour - There ar eonly a few standard fields that are not useful to me. If I add custom fields in a form they are for the project not for individual risks.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
