Description - We would like to enhance the filtering in the AEP UI. Why is this feature important to you - Having the ability to further drill down into filters via the UI, unlocks more capability for the users of AEP. How would you like the feature to work - Filter by audience on dataflow runs pages, adjust column sizing and filter for what is currently processing- Filter and sort by audience, start date, or end date on activation data page, and adjust column sizing. Current Behaviour - No current ability to do any of the above filtering in detail.
The current integration between Dynamics CRM and our CRM system displays the GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) for all synced lookup fields. This approach provides no practical value to the Marketing team, as the GUID is a technical identifier that does not convey meaningful information. Instead, presenting the actual values of these lookup fields—such as customer names, product names, or campaign titles—would significantly enhance the usability and effectiveness of the CRM system for the Marketing team.By displaying the actual values rather than the GUIDs, the Marketing team can quickly and easily identify and interact with the relevant data. This change would facilitate better data analysis, improve decision-making processes, and ultimately increase productivity.Moreover, seeing actual values instead of GUIDs aligns with the way the Marketing team uses the CRM system in their daily operations. For instance, when tracking customer interactions or managing marketing campaigns, being able to see the actual names and details at a glance is crucial. This enhancement would make the CRM system more intuitive and user-friendly, leading to a more seamless and efficient workflow.In summary, replacing GUIDs with meaningful values in the CRM system is a straightforward yet impactful improvement. It addresses the practical needs of the Marketing team, transforms the usability of the system, and ensures that the CRM data is presented in a way that maximizes its value and utility.
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： Improve Replication Queue not to block other queues when "Blocked Replication Queue" occurs ユースケース： When an error occurs in the replication queue and the queue is blocked, subsequent queues cannot be processed until the blocked queue is removed by someone.With this limitation, we'are facing a critical challenge in our operation such as;- when a block occurs on weekends or at midnight, there is no one who can remove the blocked queue, so any pages and/or assets cannot be published until next business day.- when a block occurs on a Brand A's site, that also blocks other replication queues for Brand B. Can you please change the behavior? such as skip the error queue instead of blocking all queues after an error occurs? 現在／体験した動作： When an error occurs in the replication queue and the queue is blocked, subsequent queues cannot be processed until the blocked queue is removed by someone.Notification is sent from Action Center, so that someone in administrator can notice. But when a block occurs on weekends or at midnight, there is no one who can remove the blocked queue, so any pages and/or assets cannot be published until next business day. 改善／期待される動作： Want only the queue with the problem blocked and the other queues running. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM Cloud Service 顧客名／組織名 Nissan スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合） @hiroshiorihara1
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please increase the upper limit of the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously Use-case: There are cases where many workflows (No. 1, No. 2) occur simultaneously. 1.Publishing process Approval flows may occur simultaneously to publish multiple products at the same time on the same date and time. 2.Back processing Cyclic processing for linking with other systems (once/5 minutes) Approval flow in production work (movement, deletion approval) As a result, there is an issue of delays in publishing products with specified dates and times Current/Experienced Behavior: Insufficient increase in the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously Improved/Expected Behavior: Increase the number of workflows that can be executed simultaneously. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Release 2024.5.16461.20240524T172309Z Customer-name/Organization name: Panasonic Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a one-click configuration that syncs AEM DAM with Dynamic Media for asset deactivation and deletions Use-case: Today when an asset is unpublished from AEM, author has to manually unpublish from DM also using Tools --> Assets --> CDN Invalidation. Second, if asset is deleted from AEM, it NEVER automatically deletes from DM. Second asset in same name appends -1 numerals in DM urls. This forces developers to write custom implementations to maintain sync between AEM and DM. Current/Experienced Behavior: Asset unpublished / deleted from AEM does NOT unpublish / delete corresponding assets from DM. This causes flux, unsync between AEM and DM Improved/Expected Behavior: Create a DM configuration that can sync AEM with DM. So unpublish/delete from AEM should automatically perform same actions from DM as well. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a one-click configuration that syncs AEM DAM with Dynamic Media for accepted formats. Use-case: Today we have a AEM DAM delivery folder that is synced with DM. This DAM folder accepts ALL AEM compatible formats. But they fail to upload into DM, since DM allows only restricted formats. We found after certain assets failed in production. Now adding extra implementation to reject DM incompatible formats in AEM. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM accepts more asset formats than Dynamic media. This causes AEM assets succeed at AEM, but fail at Dynamic media. Improved/Expected Behavior: Introduce a one-click config, when enabled, AEM should also reject DM incompatible asset. Reduces maintenance overhead. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Extend the "Explain Query" tool to capture graphql queries and suggest optimizations over gql queries Use-case: We are running multiple graphql queries on AEMaaCS and works in Production. Periodically some queries run longer time and sometimes heavy queries crashes the server. Current/Experienced Behavior: No tool to analyze and suggest optimizations for GraphQL queries. Improved/Expected Behavior: Build a tool similar to "Explain Query" for JCR queries that can suggest optimizations for graphql queries. Provide insights on execution time and cost for traverse and reference. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Currently there is no way to specify the order of execution of extensions that are included in launch.js and run at the top of the page.Why is this feature important to you - We use a data monitoring technology that is deployed through Adobe Launch and needs to be the very first extension that runs when the library loads so it can properly monitor the data being collected on pages. As of right now it can't monitor all technologies consistently because the order of extension code is randomized at every publish and there is no way to specify that extension A should load before extension B.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to specify either the exact processing order or be able to set an optional priority score (similar to rules) for extensions that are bundled with the core launch.js file.Current Behavior - Adobe Launch does not currently have a way to specify in the interface the priority of how extension code executes when the library initially loads on the page.
Just a reminder to everyone, a LIKE means a VOTE for this idea.It always confuses me when I see tons of views for ideas, but hardly any "likes." Description - How many times have any of you spent creating a Workspace in Adobe Analytics, only to have any number of Visualizations that you would now like to format similar to one you have recently updated? What do you do? Do you delete the old ones, and copy the new one so you may then tie them to the data table? Or, do you simply proceed to each and use that new visualization as your guide to update the others?Why is this feature important to you - This would be a productivity UPLIFT. There are plenty of times when I'm adjusting components in a workspace that I would love to simply apply changes I just made to related items. How would you like the feature to work - For this specific feature, I would simply like to go to the Visualization I like, right-click on it, select "Copy Visualization," select the Visualization I wish to update, rightl-click on it and have a choice available that says, "Paste Formatting." When I do, the component/Visualization "snaps" to emulate the formatting of the component I just copied, with all of the data intact. EXAMPLE: AND THEN: Current Behaviour - At this time, there is no functionality provided to perform this kind of activity. I would either have to copy the new component multiple times and connect it to the appropriate data; OR, I would have to simply update individual components to match the new component I just updated, one at a time.
Description - Row level filtering from batch source connections Why is this feature important to you - Ability to filter out rows of data based upon specific filtering criteria. How would you like the feature to work - Utilize the flow service api to specify a row level filter parameter for all batch source connections. Current Behaviour - The ability to filter row level items is only available using Snowflake, Dynamics, Saleforce, and GBQ. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/sources/api-tutorials/filter
Description -We'd really like to be able to lock down the ability to delete proof comments from certain users. Why is this feature important to you -We have our Compliance teams beginning to use Workfront and would love to be able to "lock down" this particular ability to meet regulatory requirements/guidelines. But we don't want to lock it down system wide/for other roles in other departments. How would you like the feature to work -Ideally I'd be able to toggle the ability to delete comments on or off a proof profile. Current Behavior -Currently you can only toggle this feature on/off system wide, there is no way to customize by user/etc.
Description - As far as I understand in the settings for an access level, I can restrict if users can only see other users from their company and additionally from the primary company. I would like to have the possibility to restrict users to see users from their company and other users, who are als members of any team / group these users are in.Why is this feature important to you - Users of companies other than the main company should be able to interact with users of other companies, but only with users with whom they have a specific defined connection.How would you like the feature to work - A third option under People in other companies should only view users from..., meaning "Groups / Teams they are also members of".Current Behaviour - Currently if the option Their Company is activated, only users of their company are visible. Setting the option The Primary Company extends this functionality to all users of the primary company.
Since Workfront changed the keyboard shortcuts to indent tasks from tab to Option+>, it's been really inefficient to quickly add new tasks to project templates. With the latest release, it's no longer possible to indent or outdent tasks during the creation of a task. A user now needs to add a new task, click out of it, then indent or outdent, which adds an extra step and slows you down. Aside from the keyboard shortcuts no longer working for templates, the indent/outdent options do not appear while you are creating a new task.
Hi Adobe Product team - this idea has been raised previously multiple times with no response so raising it again. While there are APIs available for Properties and Hosts, , currently there's no API that allows us to get names of workspaces. Workspaces are integral part of Adobe Target now and most of the other APIs return "workspace-IDs" in the response. End-users cannot understand the "IDs" which leads us to build custom solutions like a lookup table which is not an efficient solution. We'd like to have an API that returns: 1. Workspace IDs 2. Corresponding workspace name 3. Optional - all property-IDs where this workspace has been used Thanks in advance Regards Rajneesh
Description - Similar to how we can leverage the Blocklist to remove attributes or segments that should not influence AI models, it would be helpful if we could add 'weight' to other attributes/segments to help the model identify likely influential data. There are times when we think certain segments are likely to be a component to influence the models. My hypothesis is that by weighting these, it could help models that may be otherwise struggling to fully form.Why is this feature important to you - We have found in some situations where the AI was not able to generate working models with specific influential attributes and I'm wondering if this might help? I realize this may be slightly contradictory to how the model is supposed to workHow would you like the feature to work - Could work similar to blocklist via the APICurrent Behaviour - No current ability to add emphasis to attributes or segments for AI models
Description - We have been trialling a number of Auto-Allocate/Target activities and we have unearthed that due to our geographical position we are unable to separate specific market/environment activities from the default environment when there are multiple environments present. The attempts to trial market specific activities results indicate that AI does not have an impact and the added reports (Pers. Insights/Important Attributes reports) not present. With the current documentation outlining that any activity that incorporates the default and another environment that it outlines the hits and conversions are 'Considered' but essentially requests are all served by the default environment. Why is this feature important to you - It is important to be able to run the AI tools within Target that are not reliant on using and including the default environment which is a huge limitation for us. This enables market separation when launching a new AI delivered activity. How would you like the feature to work - When creating a new Auto-Target/Allocate/Personalisation activity having the option to determine which markets/environments for the activities models to be based on(Single or Multiple). Currently any test has to include the default, each of the activities should be dependant on the environment/market you want to run an activity on or on multi environment activities to select what environment is the decisioning source. Current Behaviour - We are currently using Auto-Allocate and Auto-Target, and whilst we have seen success in these tools we've observed and proven that the tools are not usable if you use within markets other than the default environment. For those users who work geographically and want to launch specific experiences for specific markets we are unable to without including the default environment, even then the data from the market is only 'Considered' as apart of the model not a decisioning element.
Description - It would be super helpful if we could paste a screengrab in Updates rather than having to save down an image somewhere and then link to it. Often times it's just a quick visual needed to get a point acrossWhy is this feature important to you - we spend more time saving an image to sharepoint, copying the link and pasting it into an update than it would take to copy and paste directly from a snipping tool into the update wysiwyg box.How would you like the feature to work - copy and paste directly from a snipping tool into the update wysiwyg boxCurrent Behaviour - saving an image to sharepoint, copying the link and pasting it into an update
Description -We need the ability to copy and paste a section of an Excel spreadsheet in an update. Why is this feature important to you -This adds multiple steps to our day to day process and we need to paste parts of a excel table 50+ times a day. How would you like the feature to work -Be able to paste rows from a excel spreadsheet into a update.Current Behaviour -
Description - in the current Analytics extension's set variables action, one can only add known events, and those only one by one. It would be amazing if one could just have a data element that can be passed in here, that holds a comma-separated events list e.g., coming from a lookup table Why is this feature important to you - the current UI is great if everything is static, but sometimes it would save a lot of time/rules if could just have a single data element that holds the logic, and the extension takes care of the rest i.e., add the values contained in the list in the linkTrackEvents, the same way it does for the individually set events How would you like the feature to work - add an input field for the list. The field can be populated with the standard percent placeholder for Data Elements (database symbol) Current Behaviour - one by one events to be added
When creating a Custom Form - Just like the TEXT and PARAGRAPH fields have 3 different width size options to choose from, you need that for the CALCULATED FIELD as well. My company pulls in large paragraphs of text into the Calculated Field and the width of that field box is standard, can't make it larger. Very limiting and not user-friendly.
Tasks on the homepage will only appear for workers on their Work List if they are listed as the Primary Assignee. We often have more than one person assigned to a task and they all need to be able to see when it's with them to work on.
Description - AEP sandbox Tooling to support moving incremental changesWhy is this feature important to you - To avoid manual changes to the sandbox components like schema between sandboxesHow would you like the feature to work - Support moving incremental changesCurrent Behaviour - When the object e.g. schema already exists in the target sandbox, there is no way to move the incremental changes in the schema.
Description - Ability to assign different sandbox/schema in the Adobe Launch/Tag XDM objectWhy is this feature important to you - We need to leverage different sandbox environment according to the Launch/Tag environmentHow would you like the feature to work - Able to assign a mapping of Launch environments to the AEP sandboxes/schema in the XDM object UI.Current Behaviour - You can only select a single sandbox/schema. So after picked development sandbox/schema in the XDM object UI, it won't be able to change automatcially to Prod sandbox when the Launch property is published to production. Please also refer to https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-platform/adobe-launch-tag-environments-and-aep-sandboxes/td-p/669279
Currently, project managers don't receive email notifications when someone posts an update or a comment on their project, unless they are tagged. This makes them miss important updates. It would be great to receive these email notifications as well. This would help them stay on top of the progress. Plus, provide a setting to turn this on or off these notifications in the user profile notifications area.This feature could also apply to tasks/issues, but only for primary assignments.
Description - I would like the posting update part of the plugin to put attachments into the documents portion of the object (which it does today), but take any imbedded pics in the email and make them images directly in the update instead of converting them to documents. This would allow users to read the updates on the object and not have to go to documents to see the images. Current Behaviour - Using the plugin to post an update to a project/task/issue, converts imbedded pictures in the email to documents on the object
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
