Adobe Workfront

I am trying to group by week against a report but it shows the dates as the Sunday rather than Monday. 

We're trying to open up access to a request queue to users who have view access to a queue. However when we do this, users who are associated with the project group (users who were not apart of the primary company) lose the ability to submit request to this queue even though they have view access.  Does anyone know why this would happen?

Hi,My organisation has recently migrated to the Admin Console for managing users. We added 4 external requestors to WF and when I checked these in the console, their ID type's were Federated. We have not federated them and I assumed they would be assigned as Adobe ID types.I'm waiting to hear back from the clients if they have access but want to understand this better.Is there a better process to follow to make sure they are Adobe ID's?ThanksMatt

Hi Community,Are you awere of any customers in China using Workfront to manage their approval workflows for proofing? Thanks!

Helloes, We are having the following scenario: the planned completion date is today for an approval task, and we would like to send an email to the user who should be approving it - that s totally fine and we managed to achieve this easily. Now comes the following case: there could be multiple tasks that are supposed to be approved today (either in the same project, or different projects). Is there any way we could consolidate all those tasks or projects links into a single email that we send at the beginning of the day lets say, so the users are not spammed with emails?  Have a great day ahead!

All I see the experience league videos to follow the exercise walkthrough and do practice in test instance for fusion learning.Its very hard to follow and understand the capability for a person who has no coding background or Developer experience.I would want to know if there is any Bootcamp kind of training that Adobe provides/provided in the past.

once I approved any request, how can I find my list which has been approved?

Are you passionate about Workfront and eager to share your expertise with the community? The Adobe Champions Program recognizes our most knowledgeable and passionate practitioners—those who help drive product adoption by:Sharing technical expertise, best practices, and strategies with the broader customer community.Collaborating with Adobe teams through product feedback, beta testing, and roadmap discussions. Each year, 40 Champions are selected through a rigorous application and review process across key Adobe Experience Cloud products, including Adobe Marketo Engage, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Manager, and new this year Adobe Workfront, Adobe Commerce, and Adobe Experience Platform. Join our live webinar to learn more about the program, benefits, selection process, and how to make your application stand out.Date: Thursday, May 15, 2025Time: 9am-10am PSTRegistration: https://engage.adobe.com/Champion_applications.html The application window for new 2025-2026

The hairline outline around fields in reports and project templates is very difficult to see. It's almost non-existent. I have several people on my team that have trouble viewing it and can't quite click into the box to change the status. See screen shot attached. How can I change the hairline outline to a dark color like black? Thanks.

Does Workfront have a mobile app available? When I open the Play Store on my Android phone, the only option I see is "Adobe Workfront for AirWatch", which doesn’t open after installation.

Hi there,  I have been testing the new document approval / unified approval between the document and proof functionality. Has there been any talk about enabling a combined "Reviewer and approver" role rather than just either "Reviewer" or "Approver"? We have many situations where our approver needs to also make a comment prior to approving. I am assuming all of the capabilities in Proof HQ will eventually live there, but I have seen that not always be the case, so I wanted to check.  Thank you! Brittany Lang Thermo Fisher Scientific 

I would love the Community's help in finding a solution our Task Template problem. We have a task template that is pre-assigned to a design to quickly work on urgent / quick turnaround requests.When a project is created, the project owner attaches the template.  The template is set up so that if a project is submitted PRIOR to 1130 am, all tasks will be assigned for same day.1. However, we only want the designer to see the first task, not the Design Revisions or Prep Final files task. Currently the designer is seeing all three tasks.  The template is also set up so that if a project is submitted AFTER 1130 am, all tasks will be assigned NEXT business day.The template is also set up so that if a REVISION or APPROVAL is given AFTER 1130, the tasks will be assigned NEXT business day. We have discovered that the REVISION and PREP FINALS task are not showing up as expected. See below for descriptions. Please let us know if you need further details. Happy t

  On a document report has anybody found a way in text mode to only show users with a certain license type (external users)?

Is there a setting that allows a user to update the status of their task but does not allow them to adjust the hours for the task?

Hi all, I can't get it to work so decided to reach out for some expert help ! I'm using a 'typeahead' field in a custom form to allow users to select someone from a particular group that they have been working with. So the Typeahead 'Referenced Object Type' is User I then want to limit the user names selectable to only those in one 'group' so I add this into the filter to specify the group group:ID=66d8ccc9005443e4cb8c60dd1b292bb4group:ID_Mod=in But it doesn't work. They are of course not selecting a group from the typeahead - but I thought this text mode was appropriate. Or do I have to relate it back up a level to the user - using EXISTS: Thanks in advance

I'm using this url/api call in an external lookup field. $$HOST/attask/api/v15.0/OPTASK/search?&projectID=67cb4d760009ae6c758e61510ec421e5&name_Sort=asc&$$LIMIT=500&DE:STZWF_Interactive Type ELF={DE:STZWF_Interactive Type}&$$QUERY and this JSON Path $.data[*].name When running the api call directly from a Chrome browser, I get valid data: (The value for the field DE:STZWF_Interactive Type = Banner) API call: https://starz.sb02.workfront.com//attask/api/v15.0/OPTASK/search?&projectID=67cb4d760009ae6c758e61510ec421e5&name_Sort=asc&$$LIMIT=500&DE:STZWF_Interactive%20Type%20ELF=Banner&$$QUERY Return: {"data":[{"ID":"67cb54050015b446088449ef862574d8","name":"COX Digital Banner","objCode":"OPTASK","percentComplete":0.0,"plannedCompletionDate":"2025-03-10T13:16:00:000-0600","status":"NEW"},{"ID":"67cb5405001620d46deb0cb38fe7344e","name":"DirecTV Encore Guide Banner","objCode":"OPTASK","percentComplete":0.0,"planne

I want to see all the current tasks and the primary assignees in a project report view. I've created a text mode column that shows these things BUT it's also pulling in some tasks at the bottom of my projects that are used for deliverable information, these tasks have no assignee so I'm looking for what I could add to my text mode reporting to exclude these tasks without an assignee from the results.  I attempted adding: IF({assignedTo_mod}=notblank but that changed the results to only show current tasks without an assignee (the opposite of what I wanted).  Here's my current code, would love some pointers on what I can do differently to get only current tasks with assignees to show in this columndisplayname=Current Tasks listdelimiter= listmethod=nested(tasks).lists textmode=true type=iterate valueexpression=IF({numberOfChildren}=0,IF({canStart},IF(CONTAINS("CPL",{status}),"",CONCAT({name}," - ",{plannedCompletionDate},": (",{assignedTo},")")))) valueformat=HTML

The WUG SoCal Chapter is back for another event in June, and this time, we're bringing to you one of the hottest topics in tech - AI. 🔥🔥  In addition to networking with local peers in your area 🌴, this 45-minute virtual event will feature a lively, fast-paced, and energetic debate (imagine a mix of 'The View' and 'Pardon the Interruption') focused on Workfront AI, covering everything from the latest features and trends to strategies for overcoming AI approval challenges in your organization. Think of it as an unfiltered, completely open forum where you can ask others your burning questions, express what you're most excited about, and get real talk from others in your industry. We’re excited for you to bring your perspective to the table.  Register here: https://workfront-augs.adobe.com/e/mndtdz/

Hi! We like to use the operators available under 'general function' when configuring 'Search Criteria' in Fusion. But we cannot seem to get it to work. Can one of you help us with our query? 1. In case we configure the search criteria like in this screenshot directly below, the scenario works.  2. But as this is the same object and just to different values, we would like to combine this using the 'OR-statement' like seen in the screenshot directly below. However, this config in Fusion returns an error.  Can some determine what we are doing wrong?

Hello, Hoping someone can assist.I need to compile field-level data from multiple tasks and add it to a CSV file. The issue I’m facing is that the data is arriving in separate bundles, whereas I need it in a single bundle to correctly position the fields in the CSV, ensuring they appear in the right order and row.Does anyone know of a way to merge separate bundles into a single, easily manageable data set? Any suggestions would be very welcome!