Adobe Workfront

Hi,I am trying to use Validation logic, but it is not working as expected. Here is my logic condition - User can write '2 Alpha' and '7 digit' hence in total it should be 9 without spaces.I used this condition - IF(LEN({DE:Global | Global marketing campaign id})=9,"Please write '2 Alpha' '7 digit' and 'in total it should be 9' without spaces (eg-tmtpredict)") Issue - It is not showing the error message as expected. 

I just inherited a rather messy Workfront setup that has a plethora of user groups setup for a small group of people. It's creating a cacophany of permissions issues and I am tempted to kill all groups and make one parent group for all, especially because we ultimately want everyone to be able to see everything within Workfront. There is no functional reason for us to use this feature, especially for our size. My question is: Can I just delete these groups entirely, or do I HAVE to deactivate them? What impact would it have from a user perspective to simply delete them and make a new one with everyone on it? For the record, our setup is so messy that I'm having to re-implement from the ground up, so I'm not really interested in preserving much of the old setup. I'm just wondering if there's a real issue I should be aware of re: deletion versus deactivation. 

Hello, Hi all,I’m looking for clarification on the difference between the “Met SLA” field and the “On Time or Late” field Workfront.What’s the key distinction between these two fields?What are the intended use cases for each?What does this formula mean on the 'On Time or Late' field?IF(!ISBLANK(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)), IF(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)<CLEARTIME(Planned Completion Date), "Early", IF(CLEARTIME(Actual Completion Date)>CLEARTIME(ADDWEEKDAYS(Planned Completion Date, 1)), "Late", "On Time")),"")Formula:IF(!ISBLANK(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})), IF(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})<CLEARTIME({plannedCompletionDate}), "Early", IF(CLEARTIME({actualCompletionDate})>CLEARTIME(ADDWEEKDAYS({plannedCompletionDate}, 1)), "Late", "On Time")),"") What does this formula mean on the ' SLA Met' field?Compares Actual Duration To Template Duration (SLA) IF((SUB({template}.{durationMinutes},{actualDurationMinutes}))>-1440,"True","False") 1440 minu

Does Workfront allow to merge projects together? Not even sure how that would look. I have a situation where this would be very helpful. Although I can see why, for many reasons, this couldn't work. Maybe there is a work around?

From an enterprise perspective, we will have various groups and administrative teams managing Workfront.   Looking at the new business rules, it appears that once an object and trigger are selected it appears you cannot add another, is this accurate?    For example, we are looking at adding validation logic to a task level upon editing of the task (e.g. block completion of task if a document is not attached to the task).   If we have multiple groups that are working off the same environment, can you add multiple business rules to support each team or do they have to be layered all into the same business rule?     

I have been able to set up custom approval processes with the help from the cookbook, but I noticed that my approvals are showing up in the system approval processes.  When I created the approval process I set it to "isPrivate: true" but when I look at the system processes, that setting is listed as false.   I also created a 1 off single approval and confirmed in fusion that it shows as "isPrivate: true", and it did not show in the system approval processes so I'm assuming that's the setting I need. I even added an 'update approvalprocess' module after I create my custom process to update it with the setting changed to isPrivate true, but it still doesn't change. There is no error, it just doesn't seem to do anything. Do I need to have another setting enabled for the privacy setting to work?

I have a project with tasks that have the status of New, have a start date in the future, but they have a progress status of At risk. If I change the status to In Progress, the progress status changes to ON Time.  I know that the estimate due date is out in July 2026 but I do not know how to change it.Here is a snippet of the tasks from the project.  Any help would be greatly appreciated 

I am unable to find any documentation on this question:Does Proof keep active the PDF page or reference links on a pdf file that has been converted to a Proof? We have a report that includes a Table of Content which includes the link to the respective pdf page; however, when viewed in Proof on Workfront, the links are not working? Is this expected behavior?

Hello - Part of the way we are utilizing Workfront is our users will put in a request which will then be converted to a task or project by a group of Admins. However, when the issue is converted it is saying that the issue was entered by the Admin doing the conversion, not the original requester. Is there a way to fix this? I don't remember that being the case earlier on in our Workfront use. Example in pictures: Original requester was Rosemary, but once converted to a project requester is now Gabriela.

Hi there. Forgive me if this is answered elsewhere.  I'm looking to create a Report that shows the End Date of tasks designated for a specific milestone path for all Active and On Hold projects for a given Portfolio.  So in my specific example, I have 10 projects active and on hold, and each of them have about 25 tasks. Of those tasks, 7 tasks are attributed to milestones on (what we've called) the "Standard Milestones" path, and I would wanna only show those 7 (end) dates.  Thinking of my output, the projects would populate as separate rows on the report, and the columns along the top would each be one of the milestones, with each column as one milestone (so 7 columns total). And then, the data would be the date per project. How would I build this?

How do you search for a project by the Project Code?

I have a scenario were I'd like to remove the change status ability on the issue when its run.  I found the Share object in API Explorer but wasn't clear on how I could remove Change status.  Has anyone done something like this and could provide a bit of guidance (thanks in advance)?    

Hello, We are trying to create new users using Fusion and setting up their layout templates and resource pool. However, when we try to fetch the custom API module in Fusion, it only allows to read the system generated layout templates and resource pools (default ones) and not user specific or group specific ones. Is there a way this can be achieved?

What does the community think is the best way to start off in Fusion?  Did everyone just jump right in and start playing?  I have a good background in various programming languages and also Microsoft Power Automate.  I'm trying to deside if I'll need to purchase consultation hrs.    In trhe meantime I am going through the available tutorials. Any advice on how to begin would be greatly appreciated.  

Hi - we use the my projects home screen widget. When we toggle to "Projects I'm On" we get projects we are not assigned tasks on, but are shared with us. Is there a way to filter this out? I want to create a view that is just projects that are either owned by the user or projects where they have assigned work.

Hi All, I am looking at creating a task report. The reason why I would prefer a task report for this is, because we want to make live updates on certain fields pertaining to a task.What I am trying to display? A task may have more than one assignee. For example, Assignee 1 and Assignee 2. 1. Is there a really unique way to group by Assignee. When using the Assigned To as a grouping on a task report, Workfront will only take into consideration the Primary Assignee. I do know on an assignment report it will work as expected, but you can't interact / update any tasks from this report associated with the assignee. 2. If #1 is possible, I want to exclude in some instances assignees not reporting to a manager. For example, if I am the manager and Assignee 1 reports to me, I do not want to see Assignee 2 on the group by.  Not sure if anyone has worked on something towards this. I know the grouping by will work on the Assignment report, but we won't be able to upd