Adobe Workfront

Description - Would like to have the availability to see the blocklist for email notifications from Workfront.Why is this feature important to you - recently I have been on a back and forth confirming emails are being sent through and getting the right SMTP request, however the problem was they were just on the blocklist and having the availability to that would make a quick fix.How would you like the feature to work - Availability to the block list to my instances and also the ability to add or remove user to that depending on my criteria for that instance as a system admin.Current Behaviour - Have to ask to check and edit that list from customer support

Description -We are interested in setting up the Sharepoint/Workfront integration. Instead of using the first 3 delegated permissions listed below, is it possible for Adobe to update their application to use just one delegated Microsoft Graph API permission called Sites.Selected? Have full access to your filesRead items in all site collectionsEdit or delete items in all site collectionsMaintain access to data you have given it access toView your basic profile Why is this feature important to you This would better adhere to the principle of least privileged access and would allow us to specify one or more SharePoint sites to use with the integration rather than allowing access to all files and sites that the signed-in user has access to. How would you like the feature to work To use just one delegated Microsoft Graph API permission called Sites.Selected?  Current Behaviour Requires using all the permissions. 

There seems to be a one-way interaction between the tasks in a project and the cards that represent tasks in Boards. The primary issue is that there does not seem to be a way to add cards to a board and have them show up back in projects. Having a hybrid way of managing tasks would be extremely beneficial. Limited options for visibility of data on cards The “auto” statuses that can be configured on columns don't include Group statuses - only global.Only have access to a limited set of filtersCan’t see Duration as a custom field to add within a cardExample form Project view editing: Example from Boards: How do boards show up in views and reports?The only thing I could find resulted in this:  This button didn’t do anything useful.Looking at the project view is even more of mess: Why does it show me those fields if they’re supposed to be turned off?The view is “sticky” so it applies to whatever project you’re looking at even if you don’t want that view f

Current Behaviour / Description - Both the project and individual user settings have an option to select a schedule. If you select the project setting to have option A (no holidays) and the individual user setting to have option B (company holidays), the project will not use the project setting option A if an individual user is assigned a task. If two or more people are assigned a task however, then the task will default to the project setting of option A. The reason the project setting works is due to the system project preferences: When multiple users are assigned to a task, use the schedule of the....Project. How would you like the feature to work - We should be able to use the project setting to override the individual user's setting.  Why is this feature important to you - Users work on different types of projects. Some are more time sensitive that others so we should be able to select the schedule that works best for the project type. Additional Note

In the Workload Balancer, although time off appears as diagonal lines in the box, the hours are not calculated/included in the resources' overall planned hours for a given day. It would be helpful as a Resource Manager to see the cumulated hours (which includes ie 1 or more hours). Right now, I have to go into the Resources' time off to confirm the hours they are taking and then account for that when assigning tasks.

A project should be able to reference a previously existing Request Queue to use as its own structure for requests made within the project. Currently, each project has its own Queue Details, Queue Topics, and Routing Rules. A project that already exists should be able to lean on the Queues that already exist and house the new requests when created. This would be convenient when requesting a new task within a project.

Description - When converting a request to a task or project, the user would see the documents section that is typically available to the requester during form submission. This would allow the user to quickly drag and drop any additional files that were not uploaded when the Request was first submitted. They could do this after the Project is created, but that involves a few more clicks around the interface and this would be faster.  Why is this feature important to you - It would reduce the number of clicks needed to add documents either before or after. My process would be more efficient. How would you like the feature to work - This would work exactly like adding a Task to a Project using the "+ New Task" button and clicking "More Options." Picture attached. 

The Workload Balancer is really the only part of the Resource Manager that our teams use. The other features have not proven to work for us. The Scenario Planner (which seems unfinished) needs more of a connection between its features and the Workload Balancer. Combining the two would unify the planning of possible initiatives with the reality of a team’s capacity. They are currently disparate and fall short in how much they can be used to roadmap work quickly and efficiently. If you were able to quickly work on new initiatives and broadly assign users to those initiatives on the fly, that would be an extremely useful feature. Another disparate feature is the relationship between the Workload Balancer and the Work Effort columns in a project view. I should be able to update this percentage in the Work Effort column from within a project view and have this be reflected in the Workload Balancer. Right now it is only the “small, medium, large” shortcut, but it should be specific

This would be helpful for when using a prompt in a report and the filters are worth saving as a new, non-prompted report. 

Description - We would like all custom fields to have a check box that denotes "System Admin Only" can update. We want this to appear on existing and future fields created. We want to be able to select this during and after a new custom field is created. We want a System Admin to go into a custom field and select "System Admin Only". Why is this feature important to you - We have approximately 60 key custom fields that we only want System Admins to be able to modify. Yes, we educate and enable System Admins and Group Admins on how custom forms/fields work. We ask that any requests to modify these 60 key fields be brought to Governance Board. We have a custom form with these fields on it that we ask users to refer to. We also have a google sheet with these fields listed. We have learned (the hard way) that people forget. We need to add in a level of checks and balances to these key fields. This monitoring becomes even more important as we integrate into new applications in the futu

We would like to be able to create a portfolio, only accessible by the senior executive within out company, so they are able to create programmes of work incorporating sensitive projects. We do not want Sys admins to have access to these portfolios/programmes/projects, as the the work will be very sensitive.

Description - Currently when building many stages in Automated Proof Workflows and using the option "When previous stage deadline passes" to start the next stage, you have the option only to add days but not hours or minutes. There's a missing granularity for workflows that need to flow faster (e.g. in a day or a few hours), or when the same stage needs to be split into several stages due to the amount of users and start within 10 minutes between each other.Why is this feature important to you - We have workflows that have many users and stages and we need the stages to get activated automatically vs. how it's done now, when someone needs to manually activate each stage.How would you like the feature to work - to have minimum 10 minutes periods instead of 1 day to activate next stage.Current Behaviour - You only have the option to add days but not hours or minutes, or set specific time when the stages will be activated, which means the proofs need to be created at specific ti

Idea is to have an Approval Path for incoming requests, and for approved requests to automatically update to "Approved" Status. For example, we set up a new request queue to build a Project Roadmap. These are potential projects that will be coming later in the year. We created a basic form to gather info for our VPs to review and make an informed decision to move forward. Workflow is as follows: Step 1: Request Received Step 2: “VP Approver” (Job Role) to Approve Request (via Approval Path)If Approved, Request should show as “Approved” If Rejected, Request should show as “Rejected”  In testing, a new request comes in as "New - Pending Approval". However, when the request is approved, it changes the status to "New" vs "Approved". We need another field in the Approval Path to identify the status based on the parameters.  (See Case #00411357)

Description - Previously when someone signed in as you and sent and update or made project changes or completed a task it showed the "Bob" Did this on behalf of "Priti"Why is this feature important to you - Other Admins may make mistakes in error (hopefully not on purpose) and it doesn't show who it was actually done by. Also, our admins cover each other on vacation and it looks like we were working on vacation. How would you like the feature to work - Bring back the previous way when someone signed in as you and sent and update or made project changes or completed a task it showed the "Bob" Did this on behalf of "Priti"Current Behaviour - Doesn't show who actually did the update or changes. 

It would be really helpful if it would be possible to copy text from the proof. For example: During our production process we have to compare a lot of article numbers. Which you normally can easy copy from a pdf and paste into the tool for checking. But Workfront does not allow to copy text so we have to type it manually everytime. It would be really helpful if it would be possible to copy from the file directly as you can do it in every PDF.

Description - Allow the Widget options on the homepage to be sticky, i.e., Collapsed vs Expanded, "Showing" number, etc.Why is this feature important to you - Most of my projects are long-term, so I like seeing all my project names without the tasks unless I'm working on that specific project.I change "Showing" from 25 to All and collapse all the projects so I only see the project names. This is better visually (not as overwhelming when I don't see all the tasks under the project) and helps me prioritize at a glance and recognize new projects that I might have a one-and-done task instead of multiple tasks.How would you like the feature to work - If I change "Showing" from 25 to All and expanded to collapsed, make those changes stick unless I change them again. Also, make the widget window resize automatically to fit the displayed content instead of leaving a big white space. Current Behaviour - The My Tasks widget defaults to "Showing" 25 and all projects are expanded and the

Currently in Setup -> Project Preferences -> Projects -> Custom Quarters, I am only able to specify 8 quarters. I would like the amount of quarters to be unlimited. Our instance has over 5 years of data, and if we do any trend reporting further back than 2 years, it shows "no value" for the quarter which is undesirable. We do have a custom calculated field for quarter, but it isn't perfect.

Description - Ability to create multiple versions of an interactive proof at one timeWhy is this feature important to you - timesaver for setup and proofing.How would you like the feature to work - we have a week’s worth of site homepages to proof. We’d like to set them up as versions 1 through 7 in one proof – 7 links – and have the proofers be able to flip from v1 through v7 to proof/comment on them all at once.Current Behaviour - set up 7 different proofs to the same workflows, proofers review 7 individual proofs.

Description - Can we please add a search function to the "Reports" and "Dashboards" page? Currently I keep having to export them to then search in Excel. In addition to this, the user experience for moving Reports and Dashboards in to the folders is very painful.Why is this feature important to you - it is very inefficient, i keep creating a new report that i didn't need to, because another one that met the needs existed but i wasn't able to search properly, i can't find it. Also, the user experience for organizing and moving the reports/dashboards into folders, really sucks. I can't ever get the report to move into the folder, i have WAY too many to sort through to do this one at a time, especially when it seems like you have to click in one exact spot to be able to move those.How would you like the feature to work - put a magnifying glass/search section, like you have everywhere else. Current Behaviour - really poor user experience. I have to export then open the excel file

Hi Team,I hope this message finds you well. I would like to propose an idea for a new feature that could enhance our document access management.Feature Proposal:The proposed feature would allow document access to be automatically managed in two steps:Initial Access: Grant public access to external users, allowing anyone with a public link to view the document.Automatic Change as per selected date: After a defined date or time automatically change the access settings to restrict visibility so that only specified users on the access list can view the document.Benefits:Enhanced Security: Ensures that sensitive documents are not permanently accessible to external users.Improved Workflow: Simplifies the process of managing document access by automating transitions.Time Efficiency: Reduces manual effort required to update access settings.I believe this feature could significantly benefit our team by allowing temporary public access while ensuring privacy and security after the designated per

We would like to have a direct link between a Slack channel and the Workfront update feed of a project (and other work items).When sending a message in the Slack channel, an update is automatically posted on the related project in Workfront. This would work in both directions. When writing an Update in Workfront, the Slack channel gets updated.With this feature no important information will get lost in a Slack channel, but to be found where it is needed the most!

Description - We would like to have the ability to recalculate timeline when in a project MilestoneWhy is this feature important to you - this would save time on large projects. Often, we work in the milestone since WF is slow on big projects. It saves us time adding project tasks at a milestone level. How would you like the feature to work - add the recalculate timeline to the three dots on the milestoneCurrent Behaviour - it is time consuming since we add new tasks, predecessors and dates under the milestone, and everything sits for a long time in gray. We need to get the new dates, so we have to exit the milestone and recalculate timeline from the three dots at project level.  

Current Behavior: When a proof is created and a custom proof message is used, by default it will be used for every version of that proof. Sometimes the custom message is very specific to the round of proof. When that message is sent out in additional versions it can cause confusion. By defaulting it between rounds users can forget to uncheck it when creating new versions. This has caused confusion with some of my groups.Proposed Behavior: Include a setting that would reset the use of a custom notification for additional rounds of a proof at an instance level. If active it would uncheck the “Add custom message” radio button at each additional round of proof. They can reselect it and add a new message if it is needed.

Description - Currently, you cannot change the dates of tasks within the Workload balancer, although there are tiles that can be moved from person to person.Why is this feature important to you - When a user is doing the activity of workload balancing, there are frequently times where lack of capacity forces work to change Start or End date. Being able to do that within the same exercise and assigning work to people would save so much time, reduce risk of incorrect input, and improve user experience/adoption.How would you like the feature to work - We would like for the bars tied to a task to be movable across the date columns.Current Behaviour - Currently bars can move up and down from person to person, but they cannot move left to right from day to day.

We finally got the planned dates to "stick" so now the calendar is usable (for me!) and not dependent on when people mark their tasks done. However, not being able to export or print the calendar is still a problem so I can't use it as my single point of truth. We need to be able to print in order to take notes and distribute more widely. I'm very bummed about this turn of events.