Adobe Workfront

Description - We do have multiple admins in our Fusion team, who all get an email notification if a scenario fails. So far so good.It would be nice if you could temporarily pause these notifications for a specific scenario so as not to alert colleagues if an error occurs during modifying and testing the scenario.Why is this feature important to you - To be able to modify an active scenario without alerting team admins in case of an error.How would you like the feature to work - It would help to have a "Pause notifications" button, which stays active for an amount of time, or just a manual switch.Current Behaviour - Any admin gets notified, what leads to confusion, if not communicated, that someone is working on the scenario.

Current Behaviour:The delegate feature is only available from the "My Work" home widgetHow would you like the feature to work:Move this feature to a User profile tab or any other dedicated page Why is this feature important to you:We often set-up custom homepages for users bypassing the standard Homepage for user experience and work efficiency  

Description - I would like to be able to attach a custom form to proof templates. Why is this feature important to you - This would be more efficient when using proof approvals for various businesses/products as we could select the associated template and it would automatically pull in the correct details. How would you like the feature to work - We use Issues within a project for proof approvals on product packaging. We would like to be able to pull in specific details to a product or business with each proof created and tying the proof template to a custom form would make this process easier. Current Behavior - Currently, we have to manually add a custom form to the proof, in the document details and add the details each time as they are different for different products/businesses. 

Description - Programs need to show the currency of the projects within that program Why is this feature important to you - We have multiple programs where all the projects within that program are in GBP, but when viewing aggregated data rolled up at the program level, it defaults to USD. This is time consuming and frustrating for users looking at a Dashboard in the left nav, they have to go to the View dropdown and the Change Currency dropdown within there to select their specific currency, the 'Project's Original Currency' shows all aggregated values in USD. If currency custom fields are used on a program, they also default to showing a US dollar symbol in front of the value How would you like the feature to work - Programs allow for a selection of currency and show all currency fields in the selected currency. Current Behaviour - When viewing custom currency fields on a program or when viewing Dashboards with aggregated values on a report that have been added to the left nav o

We have received some feedback about how hard it is to track and manage comments in WF. We would love to add the ability to search/group project comments by task to make this feature easier to use and keep the team more organized.

Description - in reporting, need ability to sort and/or isolate results or group by top 10 in a matrix groupingWhy is this feature important to you - to report on top campaigns/initiatives being worked on by resource hours; provides pulse check on alignment to prioritiesHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like to be able to filter or group by top 10 (or something similar) so I can isolate data in dashboards and reportsCurrent Behaviour - Charts and Reports show all results, you have to export data to Excel to do Pivot table or ascending/descending filter. If I try to sort in my report details, it does not do it accurately. In the screenshot, you can see I have too many Campaigns listed to quickly assess our top ten.

Description - When using the Break Error Handler and a scenario retries, we would like a parameter (similar to the executionId) to let us know this is a retry, or ideally, which parent executionId is being retriedWhy is this feature important to you - We log errors in a workfront project and assign to developers, we want to remove duplicate errors when a fusion scenario retries. Currently this is only available by building our own retry logic or creating some custom execution key to try to do this ourselves, but it's not 100% accurateHow would you like the feature to work - Ideally provide an parentExecutionID with the Id of the original execution that's being retried. Or a simple flag to indicate this is a retry.Current Behaviour - No link or indication that retries are retries. 

Description - At the moment there is not simple action when we want to update access rules on an object, and it would be great to have this featureWhy is this feature important to you - At the moment there is no way to simple update access rules on Project/Issue/Task if neededHow would you like the feature to work - There is a new module or extension within custom actions where we can update access rules (add/remove/modify)Current Behaviour - We have to manually copy access rules, create new ones manually, and assign the full array to the object

I'd like to have possibilities in the resource planner to visualize the tables shown there, e.g. plot planned and actual hours vs. time. It should be possible to break down this by individuals and roles. Currently it's not possible to directly compare planned hours (planned on task level) to actual hours (tracked on project level) other than for the overall project. I need to break down this to each individual and role.As this data is already available in the Resource Planner (table format), it would very beneficial to have also graphical possibilities to analyze them. Exporting and analyzing in Excel causes additional efforts and significantly reduces the value of Workfront for my daily work. Feature should include:- plotting planned and actual hours over time- plotting planned and actual FTE over time- plotting delta between planned and actual over time- being able to plot it for selected individuals or roles

It would great as a future functionality to have screen shotting available 

Description - there's no way to reorder favoritesWhy is this feature important to you - project importance changes periodically. if i need to reorder, i have to remove from favorites and then resave in the correct order. this is extremely inconvenient.How would you like the feature to work - add a drag and drop featureCurrent Behaviour - you can only remove and add items from/to the favorites list. no drag and drop feature.

Description - It would be great if we can have a similar functionality that is available in Workfront where we can promote environments, for example if we want to test scenarios in the demo env and then move those scenarios to production teamWhy is this feature important to you - It would shorten the development time, allowing us to focus on important implementation topics and not migrationHow would you like the feature to work - Button available in teams not marked as production from which we can push scenarios/folders while defining connection from the production team that should be used for depending modulesCurrent Behaviour - Feature not available

Description - When setting up a request queue with different queue topics, it would be really helpful to limit who can see each queue topic. Why is this feature important to you - This would allow users to only see topics that apply to them while minimizing the number of queue projects in the system. How would you like the feature to work - Allow for the "Queue Settings" to be applied differently across each queue topic. Each "Queue Topic" would have its own settings with a checkbox to inherit the projects settings or to customize the queue topic's settings. Also allow for sharing within each queue topic so we could provide proper visibility into each topic. Current Behaviour - For every topic that needs different visibility, a whole new request queue needs built which causes a lot of clutter in the initial request screen.

Often we as Fusion develpoers can't go deeper than checking API responses, even with the DevTool.I would be just another level if we could for at least the Workfront and Authenticator Modules be able to see deeper logs behind the API calls and their responses. Otherwise we always have to involve support.The the idea would be to provide on option to check deeper logs in Fusion Flow Executions if needed.Have a good day

Description - a module that allows me to write custom ECMA script   Why is this feature important to you - for data conversion, often the Fusion tools are less than ideal and require many tools/regex/JSON modules to accomplish things. Especially annoying is the inability to set attributes on an object.   How would you like the feature to work - Would love a module that has an input field that takes N arguments, which can be selected from the popup panel text box that implicitly creates a function wrapper, with he selected arguments as inputs expects a return statement and the returned value is accessible in the flow as "output" similar to Switch module Bonus: ability to make this a named module, so it can be used in multiple places with just the inputs changing    

Description - Ability to report on tasks only when all dependent predecessors have been marked as complete; otherwise, the report should not show that task as something that's ready to be worked upon.Why is this feature important to you - Our teams heavily depend on previous task completion to begin the next work. With that there is a lot of time that would be spent manually on going through all tasks to see what is ready.How would you like the feature to work - If I look at a task reportCurrent Behaviour - tasks shows even if one of the predecessor is marked as complete and the task actually has more than one predecessor. Only when all predecessors tagged on that task are complete, then show me the data. Copy of the report I created while working with Adobe ticket assistance and we didnt achieve what was needed.https://deloitte.my.workfront.com/report/6877aaea000166e652c792ceb63b6ae0/detail

On the new "Subscribing to Items in Workfront" feature that was just released this week, it would be awesome to bulk subscribe to a list of items. This came up from those looking to cover while another team member is out. Right now you can only do it from the going to each landing page and subscribing individually.

Description:Allow users to highlight areas in a proof when replying to comments, not just when creating new ones.Importance:Stakeholders often miss highlighting content or only mark part of what's relevant. This would improve clarity and streamline review workflows.How it could work:When replying to a comment in a proof, users should have the option to create a new highlight linked to their reply.Current Behaviour:Highlighting is only available when adding a new comment, not when replying to an existing one.

Description - When marketing operations use workfront planning for their campaign planning, the stakeholders would want to convert a plan (planning record) into a brief (request) in workfront. post this conversion either using fusion or manual request submission, the ideal experience for a 360 view of a campaign plan would be to link the brief (request) back to the campaign plan. However the current planning config doesn't have option to relate a request object record.Why is this feature important to you - This impacts the brief intake process and indicate a critical gap between Workfront planning and Workfront on a Content Supply Chain workflow for a Marketer.How would you like the feature to work - Create a relationship connection between Workfront planning record type with Workfront request object.Current Behavior - No Option to relate Workfront Planning record with Request object in Workfront

We would like to add the same person to a review route twice in different stages. We have the project owners review proofs in stage 2, but then also need to review again in the last stage after everyone else has reviewed, so they can review other's comments, comment back for clarification or answer any questions.Why is this feature important to you - Streamlines the process. Currently, the project manager has to reach out to the project owner after the route is complete to confirm there aren't any comments that need to be responded to, and wait for the project owner to reach back out to them when they've had the chance to review again. If they can be added again to the final stage, they will get the automatic email notification that it's their turn again. Once the review is complete, the PM knows it can be routed straight back to the necessary team without any additional steps in the process. 

It would be great to allow administrators to set specific and unique error pages when a login error happens. I have two types of users in my system. Those who authenticate with SSO and those who do not and use the mydomain.my.workfront.com/login page to log in directly and manage their password. Unfortunately, any user who errors out of SSO authentication bounces to that /login page which then causes an error loop for many users who do not realize that they can't log in through that page with their SSO credentials.It would be better if I could set a specific error page that directs them to help articles on how to resolve their SSO error and get to log in again rather than redirecting them to the /login page. But I need to keep that /login page as the error page for my users who do NOT use SSO. I need both options available because I have two separate use cases here.

In marketing, we work with many files that are animated GIFs for motion in social media and paid media channels. When our teams need to review these files, it's very difficult now with only allowing individual GIFs to be reviewed as a single proof. You should be allowed to upload multiple GIFs and create a single interactive proof where the GIFs are animated. As it stands today, you must upload every individual GIF to see animation and it can create up to 20+ proofs for someone to review which isn't reasonable. Our teams end up not using the proofing for all animation because no one is going to review 20+ links when they can just open up the files on their computer instead. This is the current rule in place: You can combine GIF files; however, please note that animated GIFs will be processed as static and NOT interactive. Future state: You can combine GIF files; and animated GIFs will be processed as fully interactive proofs.

Description - Deadline reminder notifications aren't being sent to the assigned to user after the task constraint is changed before the task is due during the lift of the project. I had submitted a case with Adobe Support and they concluded that changing the task constraint while the project is current blocks the user assigned to the task from receiving the deadline reminder that is set up in the automatic reminder section. It would be helpful to have the deadline reminder notifications to still be sent to assigned users of tasks even after the task constraint is changed during the life of the project. Why is this feature important to you - Users are losing track of tasks they need to complete after the task constraint on tasks their assigned to is changed. They no longer received the system deadline reminders which is causing them to miss completing those tasks on time. We strive to have tasks completed by their planned completion dates regardless of the task constraint set.&nbsp

Add the ability to get a Fusion Test Drive account. There is already the ability to request a Workfront Test Drive account, so this would go hand-in-hand with that.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Request from users / teamsHow would you like the feature to work - A filter / view to see tasks assigned to a teamCurrent Behaviour - If the task is assigned to a "team" the people on the team do not see those tasks in Priorities / Calendar.The user (in the team) needs to click work on it first, then the task appears in Priorities / Calendar.