Adobe Workfront

Possible this is redundant to other proof ideas, but can't always tell what is for the built-in proof vs. Workfront Proof (formerly Proof HQ); this is for the latter:We need more robust reporting back to Workfront. Things like:Current Stage NameCurrent Stage Start DateCurrent Stage Due DateAny previous stages and their name, start date, and complete/lock datesA true "complete" status (vs. the vaguer idea of a "lock") for the entire review/routing. And make this complete/lock information reportable.The idea is that when a project manager (proof owner) has dozens of routings multiplied by 6-12 reviewers each that they should be able to have a report/dashboard that can report back robust information without diving into each individual project/task/document.

In an EMAIL notification that a user has an issue or project approval, they're able to see Priority in the notification without clicking into the details. This is helpful especially for high or urgent approvals. However in the respective TEAMS CHAT notification, no priority shows. The Chat is even better for this notification bc if it's high/urgent, they'll be able to quickly see that in the ping (and ppl tend to pay more attention to pings than emails). Want priority to show in the Teams chat notifications, or even just for high/urgent priority approvals.

In the New Workfront experience, there are double scroll which is cumbersome. There is one scroll for dashboard and then one for the window. It prevents seeing all of the projects in one view and have to scroll. Any way this can be fixed? In the classic, if you wanted to see all, you just needed to use the window scroll for the entire list. Attached screenshot for example.

The Fusion log history is lacking as an "enterprise" grade application. The information on who made a change to a flow and when it was made is available. However, there is no information on what change was made. Not having this information makes the log pretty useless.

We ran into the problem, that somehow the notification settings of our audit user have been changed. Only two people have access to that account and both denied doing the changes themselves. So it would have been great to see by whom those changes were made.

When editing layout templates there is an option to edit "Lists" (which controls filters, views & groupings) on various objects. However, you cannot pare down the list of filters, views & groupings that users see on individual projects or issues. Our users would like simpler functionality, and to not see all this clutter in these lists (the vast majority of our users work on single issues or projects). We would like the option to limit the number of choices they have in these dropdowns, but as the below screenshot shows, they are not available.

When you create a user from another user it automatically defaults the access level to the access of the user you are copying.However, when you create a user from another user that has be deactivated, the access level is set to the max access level you are permitted to assign. The field should be left blank or there should be a preference for the default access level that should be applied, similar to the default access level on SSO auto-provisioning.

To have the ability to rename pinned pages. See attachment for example.

In Proof HQ you could easily view other proofs in the folder, now in Workfront I am unable to do that, we upgraded (but seems like a downgrade :() Can we please get this feature back into Workfront. To compare proofs I was able to easily select compare in ProofHQ and toggle to a different proof in a folder. Now there are many more clicks involved using Workfront. Also to compare different proofs, I have to close out of the current comparison and select two new ones then launch it again. Was seamless before, now it feels like many steps backwards.Please get this into Workfront as our clients are wondering why this feature would be taken off.Thank you,Junaid

It would be great if Fusion 2 module error handling included exponential backoff, so that 429, 500, and 502 errors don't just throw an error and stop the scenario.

The current document decision options in Workfront are: ApproveApproved with ChangesReject For liability reasons, legal reviewers in the system do not want to tag documents as "Approved." We would like to have the ability to change the names of the available decisions, as they can be edited in Proof.

When filling out a custom form via a request queue and converting the issue/request to a project (where there is no project template) we would like the custom form to attach automatically without a team member having to manually attach the custom form to the project for the information to flow over.

Current UI of embedded custom forms in Workfront is disapointing. It could really use a refresh.Main problems:A lot of useless white spaceeverything left alignedlimited organization of fields (custom fields cannot be mixed with default fields)lack of brandinglack of visual elemntsoutdated UINice interface is like entry door to a store, you want this to look nice and attract customers. With workfront request form design this is hard to achieve.Few random example from internet to show how modern webform should look like

When we route websites, the image is a screengrab. When we want to use the Text tool to highlight text to make comments more streamline, we don't have the ability since text is not detectable.

Need to have the ability to do multi-filter grouping in the resource planner same as report types. This will enable us to analyze set of projects/resources at once that falls to either of the multi-filter groups.

Imagine I have a task called inspect widget. This task will take place over the course of a few days and will all be performed by the same person. This task involves checking the size, color, and electrical performance of the widget. Today I could create a task grouping and make three separate tasks, but that is both ugly and confusing. It would also grow the size of the project which affects display performance. What I envision is a checklist like capability where you could optionally tie each item in the checklist to a % completion of the total task. For example, size might be 25% of the task, color 10% and electric 65%. Checking each item off would drive completion of the task. This functionality would allow for greatly simplified project plans that still have good details as to what steps are needed to complete a task. Bonus points if we could create a way to drive predecessors off of checklist items as well as the task.

Currently when working in the agile project view you can add fields to each Story (subtask) and assign points to each card. You can add up to three fields to the card but none of the fields show the points assigned for that particular card, just the total points of the iteration (all the cards added up). Suggesting to have the ability to add a field to the card to show what that cards assigned points are. In a waterfall style project view text mode would be enables, so that may also be part of this solution.

I am using a Fusion automation to notify users that save their converted tasks into the queue project, asking them to move these tasks. The project should have a toggle "Allow Tasks" in the queue setup panel. Alternately, a class should be added to the permissions model to allow/disallow users from saving tasks into a project. Thanks.

We would appreciate the ability to set up dynamic routing rules for queue topics. This would be especially useful for queue topics that are used to log issues to live projects. For example, if someone logs a code issue to a project, I would like the new issue to use a dynamic routing rule that always routes to the project owner, or certain users that match a certain job role within the project team. This would allow us to automate the issue logging workflow considerably.

We need to have a functionality to allow "watchers" on requests/issues without being a part of the approval path or being an approver. In our environment, we have a group of executives who would like to be informed of activities. However, in our current workfront environment, in order for them to be notified in an automated fashion, they have to be set as an approver. This is creating bottlenecks in our process flow. Rather than having a request be approved by 2 people, it has to be approved by 5 instead, because the other 3 would like to be informed. This would be an extension of the subscribe functionality. Here's why the subscribe functionality fail in our organization: 1. subscribers have to manually stumble upon an issue/request in order to subscribe to it 2. admins can't pre-subscribe a user to a particular group/category of request

In the scenario someone has incorrectly logged time on the wrong project; it would be great if an Admin could transfer the hours to the correct project.

I want to see more relevant results at first. Things that are related to my team, my group or role should show up at the top, as well as things that I have accessed recently.

Inline editing from a broad report is super helpful for my team when maintaining Custom Form info. This feature is currently unavailable for document reports.

When users are "auto-provisioned" through SSO, they are created with the base access level (Requestor) by default. This base level is the requester access. There is currently no way to change the default, this is a limitation of the product. I'd like a way, as an admin, to change the default access level to Reviewer instead of Requester.

This is just a test I have a customer that needs to edit their idea and I am trying to find out how to do so.