Adobe Workfront

If you start typing in a cell within a report and then navigate to a different webpage without clicking somewhere blank on the screen, you will lose that information. If the webpage had an autosave function which admins could turn on and off, this would mitigate this issue.

Currently you cannot add existing uploaded Document objects to a new version of existing Proofs. You must firt download the document and then upload it to a new version of teh proof.It woull save a lot of time to be able to select multiple uploaded documents from the document area to an existing proof hat requires a new version.

It's great that we now have the option to add/remove the Documents upload section on requests but it would be nice if it were down on the Queue Topic level, rather than the entire Queue level. There are some topics that we really don't need the Document Upload section cluttering up, but it is useful for other topics within the same larger Queue project.

An easy way to upload word and excel documents as a proof and make the changes live and then execute all the changes in the word document.Adding annotation to an online proof, then require someone to go an make these comments onto the actual word document - it's an inefficient use of resources when the changes will be accepted.Ideally it would allow to track the changes and then an option to apply the changes onto the actual file.

We need greater flexibility across the system in managing documents. Specifically in the project and task documents tab. USE CASE: Currently the only way to move a document from a project to a task is to download the file and re-upload it to the task/documents area. The system then pushes the document back up the project document level regardless. This creates multiple version of the same file which I would guess is eating up storage space and causing confusion. It would be great if we could link a document stored in the global documents area to a project or a task. A use case for us is where we need to send a specific document along with supporting documents to be proofread by a user. Currently we have to download that assets from the system, and re-upload them to the task level/documents area. Once this task closes, the documents are lumped in with the rest of the project documents and association with the task is lost.

In The "DAM upload request" is there a way for the due dates entered in the calendars to send an alert to parties involved. It is great that we can add the due date but an email notification would be really super.

The assigned work filters in the Workload Balancer filter by work attributes and filter by user attributes independently of one another. For example, if you try to filter by Portfolio, the balancer will only show you those hours associated w/ that portfolio, not a user's full allocation across ALL of the projects/portfolios they've been assigned work on.This becomes a major issue when you try to use the Workload Balancer to resource by each PM's projects. There is no way to show all projects that are owned by a particular PM and each of their project's assigned workers full capacity. Filtering by Owner ID will show all users unless you apply a user-related filter and in this case, there's no filter that exists to show all users associated w/ a project.There needs to be a way to view the assigned work + working team by Project Owner.

It would be nice to have the ability to add notes to an IP Whitelist range. We have many IP ranges it's hard to keep them all straight. We have to track on a separate Excel sheet. It would be a nice enhancements to allow notes next to the range for a quick reference of the company it's assigned to.

When in a project, the ability to turn off auto save is an available setting. Proposing that the same functionality be added to the template functionality for the same reasons it is on the project.

When including a hyperlink in a description (or other area within Workfront) it is not possible to mask (embed) the link to reduce the length of the URL. This takes up unnecessary space and can be problematic when viewing the description in certain views and/or reports. By allowing the links to be embedded within a word/phrase similar to email, or a word document you could have a better user experience when viewing the description field.

Currently if you have a rich text field in a report you can highlight words and insert a link. However, when you export that report to pdf, excel, etc. the links do not come through. However, if you print a dashboard with these reports on it the links DO come through! But as we all know dashboard printing is NOT great. I'm hopeful this will be fixed in reporting 2.0 but I'd love a fix before then!

It would be helpful to have a separate task preference for not allowing completed tasks to show up when a project is completed on a timesheet. Right now, there is the all or nothing option but we would like completed tasks to show up for active projects a week longer but not anything for completed projects.

When adding a new project status, the new status appears by default at the bottom of the status list.This is also the default order as it appears to the end-user.The current workaround involves updating the order for each group, rather than an option to order at the master level (i.e. change default order for all groups).Our instance has 800+ groups, and we cannot re-order the status list one by one.There should be an option to order at a master level or at least set the order when you create a new status.

Similar to other objects, add the ability for the system administrator to control what access level can create, edit and delete teams. In addition, incorporate the ability to delegate control of the team to specific individuals. Currently, anyone on the team can edit the team settings or members, which can result in a breakdown in process when teams are used (default team in routing rules).

I created a filter awhile ago that allows me to select all roles with a specified cost per hour. Now whenever I select that filter name, which has the $ in it, the system locks the view and I have to manually resent my account. I was told that Workfront no longer allows special characters in views or filters. If that is the case, PLEASE set Workfront up so that it will throw an error if a special char is entered / don't allow the filter to be saved with a special char. Also - I can't delete the filter without selecting it, and if I selecting it, it locks up and I have to reset my account. This needs to be fixed.

Used to be able to use the Ctrl/Command + Enter hotkey (like in outlook/gmail/etc.) to post updates. Wanted to add this to the innovation lab in case other people miss that feature too. Would love to see it come back in a future release.

Custom fields of type "textfield with formatting" bring great value to reports - e.g. providing detailed updates and descriptions using formatting options like bullet points.However, when exporting reports which such fields (e.g. to .xlsx or .pdf), the format gets lost and the data more or less useless.Thus we would like to have the export including the set formats.

The current Workfront functionality intermixes Project level updates with those made on included tasks and issues. It includes even more breadth of topics at the Program level.This causes updates to the project or program record itself to be hidden in the noise.Please create an ability to filter down to just those updates for the object itself (none of its children/sub-items). This should be able to be toggled on/off by the user - similar to the system updates.

The team is struggling to communicate priority order of tasks submitted to requesters. They have a report with all the current request but they need a way to let them know the order in which they are completing the requests. We need a field that allows you to set an order to requests/issues, projects, tasks, etc. and when the #1 priority request is completed the field updates automatically to mark #2 as the new #1 issue in the queue.

When a user gets a notification, the object name and "See in Workfront" at the top take you to the object (project/task/issue) and not the actually comment that the notification is for.Only the "Comment" button at the bottom of the notification takes you to the actual comment the notification is for.It is misleading and not helpful.

We are in desperate need of a "like" button in Workfront Proof. We had this button in our previous system and it is the one thing ALL reviewers/approvers keep asking to bring back, especially our Leadership team.Reviewers leave comments in a proof but the decision to act upon the comment, or not, is dependent upon cross functional business partners as well as our VP's approval. When these folks are in a proof, if they agree with the requested change they click LIKE. That is the green light for the designers to move forward with the update.We've tried using the resolve button however that is used for other situations and it got way too confusing. I fear leadership will will start to challenge if WF is the right system for us. It may seem small and insignificant to many out there but it is essential to our process.

The issue we're trying to solve for is that users in the new experience under requests can select a request under the Name Column and leave comments/upload files there. Because those comments/files don't appear in the converted project they can get lost causing confusion/project delays. We'd like to be able to separate Requests from Converted Projects or allow us to manage the view on the request page to remove the Name Column.

We would like to have the ability to enter in a number (x) as a total time spent for the week, and have the system calculate the average (x/5) for each day of the week.

The idea is to have the original custom message that was sent to be part of the thread when sending an addtl message directly to the recipient from within the workflow. Use Case:Proof Owner sends proof to recipient with a custom message. The proof deadline passes and the proof owner sends a follow up message from with the workflow to the recipient. The follow up message does not contain any of the original custom message and the proof owner ends up copying and pasting that original message into the follow up message. This is similar to this idea if you would want to combine the ask.https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0874X000000oOQyQAM/detail

Please add the following filters to the Workload Balancer: CompanyGroupIssuesResource Pool