Adobe Workfront

Description - Would like the ability to create templated email sends for automated workflows in proofWhy is this feature important to you - When routing assets to a handful of different companies, we would like the ability to send personalized emails to each company that can be templated and attached to the automated workflow they are on. Currently, you can customize an email when setting up a proof, but this adds a lot of manual work to our team that is setting up the proof to copy and paste a message in, when it could be templated out and drive efficiencies for our team. How would you like the feature to work - For each unique automated workflow, create a section that allows you to tailor email communications that can be saved and are always on when creating a proof with a specific automated workflow.Current Behavior - Does not exist, but you can customize an email upon proof creation.

Description - Would like the ability to target different on load messages in Proof and be able to attach them to specific automated workflows.Why is this feature important to you - We would love to be able to have this feature enabled for some users and not all users when viewing a proof. For example, we have external users that need the message and the internal company users do not need the message. Since we are unable to target a specific workflow, all users unfortunately have to see and click to remove this message, which adds another step for the end user and they have found this to be an annoyance since we turned this on recently. Lastly, we have a few different businesses in our instance and it would allow flexibility for different units to control their own messaging.How would you like the feature to work - Be able to create personalized on load messages that you are then able to target to specific proof automated workflows.Current Behavior - Currently you are able to turn on th

Description - We would like the ability to limit commenting to only those tied to the Proof workflow.  Currently you can add ANY proof user to a comment. Why is this feature important to you - As a marketing agency, we work with competitor clients and some users work across clients.  We need the ability to protect proprietary information and protect from inadvertently emailing someone with a similar name at the wrong client.  Our art directors work with many groups and the external emails are only used in Proof.  External clients do have not access to our platform.  So changes to user access would not be an option for us. Also, the Share setting within Proof itself isn't feasible because Partner accounts only seems to work with organizations that also have WF Proof.  How would you like the feature to work - It would be good to have an option within the proof workflow details that restricted users from tagging anyone but the people who are me

I needed to update the calculation on a custom form, but instead of just adding the new code in I have receive an error code stating " Form Number field is used in a multi-form configuration, if you would like to change this formula you will need to remove this field and replace it with a new one containing the desired calculation". Form Number is the custom field I wanted to update, but now I have to create a whole new field, add the modified formula, remove this field from every form it's on, and add the new field back where the old was replaced... but b/c I don't want the name of the field to change I have to do this a second time with the correct name. This is a huge undertaking when every other field updates immediately when an update occurs, not sure why this can't update as well. Even selecting the option of Update Calculation is useless.

I am a power user/resource hog in Fusion. I perform 10s of thousands of operations and frequently need to move around 100s of MBs if files. As such, I run out of your paltry 1GB of memory frequently. I am informed by Support that there is no way to monitor the current memory usage while running a Fusion scenario. And the official answer is "just do less". I argue this is a PRIME case for providing us access to poll the current used memory from within a running scenario. Similar to an Environment variable. This way I would not have to run hard until I hit a brick wall, I could periodically poll the current memory usage and decide if I need to gracefully stop or if I am able to continue on. I am surprised that this doesn't already exist, as it is rather asinine that I can "do anything" in Fusion, but run it hard until it breaks in a non-graceful way. Thank you,Wes-(Very large, multi-milion dollar client)

We would like to be able to report on total Planned Hours by Role by Project. Currently if more than one role is assigned to a task in a project, we can't report on the planned hours for each role on the task.  Reporting on this will allow us to better estimate effort hours by role for new projects from prior projects. We cannot use Actual hours as we don't carry worker licenses for all of our users so being able to use Planned Hours would get us closer.   Also, since we are not able to break out Planned Hours for tasks by role, we are also not be able to compare planned hours to actual hours, which is something we are hoping to do as well for those who do have a worker license.   

Description - Currently the three options for individual user proof permission profiles are supervisor (listed 1st), manager (listed 2nd) and administrator (listed 3rd).  Why is this feature important to you - Our team uses proofs actively on all projects.  Each user needs the right access to proof/edit/approve, etc.How would you like the feature to work - I have a few options.  1 -  Switch the word manager to reviewer so someone knows that's the lowest level permission.  2 -Put the options in access order = manager, supervisor, admin.  Option 3 - Add a question mark icon to define these three levels when someone hovers over it.Current Behaviour - I had my designers using the manager setting and there were numerous access issues.  I didn't realize it was the lowest level permission.

Description - Use an LLM and finetune it with WF(and the other products) documentation and the content stored in the Community forums. Then put it either in the search or in the side bar as an assistant.Why is this feature important to you - It would be a great way to make finding answers more efficient.How would you like the feature to work - Expained above in Description.Current Behavior - THere is currently no AI so searching is the only choice.

Description - Within the comment section, have a dropdown of premade comments (Ie: Done reviewing, Done w/ comments, Done w/o comments, etc) that users can click on instead of having to type out certain messages.Why is this feature important to you - For a handful of our user base, they leave the same type of comments when they're reviewing work. This would help reduce the amount of clicks by having some type of dropdown list of comments to choose from instead of having to type it all out.How would you like the feature to work - Be added as an additional field type where a sys. admin can type in the comments and it will show as a drop down option to the user. Current Behaviour - Not available/ users have to fully type out their comments

I've found the Workfront Cookbooks to be extremely helpful in optimizing our Workfront experience. Something that I've continued to struggle with as a small implementation team is best practices for training. Could you develop a Workfront Training/Implementation Cookbook for new users? 

Description - When creating a new webhook, it's very difficult to search for a custom field within a filter. We have a lot of custom fields and having a simple dropdown which is lengthy is not ideal in 2025. A searchable dropdown as for example this one (https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_filter_dropdown.asp) would be extremely helpful. This would primarily be for a webhook, but the same approach would be for other Workfront modules where currently CMD+F "does the trick".Why is this feature important to you - I spend ages in trying to find a custom field in a webhook dropdown.How would you like the feature to work - Just add a searchable dropdown instead of a regular HTML dropdown.

Would like the ability to build into a template a specific task notification. So if task 42 is marked complete it would send a notification to either a certain user or group or ideally an outside email address (executive notification). We have people who only want to know when one specific task is complete.