Skip to main content
C_Blakeley
Level 2
August 14, 2026
New

Ability to Filter for Assets in Archived Folders Only in Design Studio

  • August 14, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 53 views

While it is currently possible to select multiple assets within the UI, the available filters do not provide an option to view assets located exclusively in archived folders. At present, users can only choose to include archived folders in their search results, which means archived and active assets are returned together.

It would be valuable to have the ability to filter for archived folders only.

Use Case

During instance clean-up and governance activities, teams often need to review assets that have already been archived. Being able to isolate assets within archived folders would make it easier to distinguish them from live, in-use assets, reducing the risk of accidentally unapproving, modifying, or deleting active assets. This functionality would improve efficiency, support better instance management, and help ensure that clean-up efforts are focused only on retired content.

3 replies

PeeyushSachdeva
Level 5
August 14, 2026

Hi ​@C_Blakeley ,

 

Right now Marketo's asset search (and the multi-select picker) doesn't have a dedicated "archived only" filter. The "include archived" option just merges archived items back in with your active ones, so you end up scrolling through both together instead of being able to isolate the retired content. Not ideal when you're doing clean-up and really don't want to risk touching something that's still live.

A couple of things that may help you work around this in the meantime:

  1. In Advanced Search, select all the asset types you want to review, then uncheck "Active Trigger" from the list. That drops active/trigger campaigns out of the results, which narrows things down quite a bit and makes it easier to spot what's actually sitting in archived folders instead of wading through everything that's still live.
  2. Longer term, it's worth setting up one global Archive folder and making it a habit going forward - any time a program or asset gets retired, move it into that folder right away instead of leaving it scattered around its original location. Once that becomes routine, future clean-up passes get a lot faster because you already know exactly where to look, instead of hunting for archived content across the whole instance.

Neither of these gets you the exact filter you're describing, but they've made governance and clean-up noticeably more manageable for us in the meantime.

 

Thanks.

C_Blakeley
Level 2
August 19, 2026

Hello PeeyushSachdeva, 

Thank you very much for your reply. 

I don’t believe the ‘active trigger’ in advanced search allows you to view isolated archived content. The advanced search also doesn't allow for multiple assets to be selected, so i would still need to manually select each content for clean up.  Please do advise if this doesn’t sound correct :-)

We do already have global archive folders to reduce the admin, but I'm still at a loss with cleaning up 100’s of legacy programs, assets, campaigns etc. For example in Design Studio where you can ‘include archive folders’, when trying to select multiple assets, because it doesn't allow you to isolate archived folder content when selecting multiple assets to be unapproved or deleted. 

We are also utilising our marketo agency to run an API for unapproved assets in the archived folder to reduce the manual labour of cleaning up the archived legacy content, but its frustrating that a simple feature doesn't already exist natively for basic housekeeping requirements. 

Thank you for your reply, its much appreciated. 

CBlakeley
PeeyushSachdeva
Level 5
August 19, 2026

Hi ​@C_Blakeley,

I agree with you. I was thinking of the Active Trigger filter as a way to narrow down the results for Marketing Activities, but you're right that it doesn't actually isolate archived-folder content or solve the multi-select limitation for cleanup.

Cleanup is always a headache in Marketo, especially when you're dealing with large-scale housekeeping. It creates unnecessary manual effort and also increases the risk of accidentally touching something that shouldn't be changed.

I completely agree that having this as a native feature would make cleanup much easier. Upvote from my side as well! 👍