One landing page for multiple downloads

@Charlie, I haven't seen that segmentation method before, that's neat. 

Does it use the URL parameters to force the lead into a particular segment? Does that override the smart list conditions defined inside the segmentation itself, or do you just leave these blank? 

@Sanford, can you explain how you did that with only CSS? Also very neat :) 

@David, That is an interesting challenge because you could have n combinations of assets needing to be displayed based on the checkboxes selected on the previous page. 

I suppose the segmentation method Charlie described could in theory work for this, but you would need to create a segment for every possible combination of assets. For example, if you had 5 assets to choose from (and the lead could choose any possible number including all 5) that is 31 different possible combinations. Not much fun! 

If you have a smallish number of assets it would be not too bad. But I would hope there would be a more elegant method than this, perhaps where you would append a series of show/hide values to the URL that would determine whether any individual asset is displayed. Sanford's CSS trick could perhaps work for that. 

@David D Depends on what's "minimal" to you. :)

This example is about as basic as I can imagine. However it is not scriptless, as you can see.

http://jsfiddle.net/sanford/45x2562z/show/

@Justin N Using the CSS :target pseudo-selector you can show or hide elements based on the #hash of the document.   Or rather, I should say an element as the hash, and :target, are designed to highlight/scroll-into-view exactly one element on the page.  Works in my first example because we are only interested in showing the one interesting element.  In what I built for @David D we are potentially passing multiple element identifiers in the hash, like #filename 1,filename 2,filename 3.  Thus we need some JS to extract those elements for use in CSS.  It's not much JS at all, but it may be more than a lot of people can handle without anxiety!

Thanks Sanford! That is indeed what we are looking for. I'll pass it along to someone who has less anxiety regarding JS ;).
-David

Thanks Sanford.