Skip to main content
August 25, 2016
Question

Editing a Flow mid-Flow?

  • August 25, 2016
  • 2 replies
  • 3177 views

Hi guys,

I had a flow that went like this:

(intended to be launched on August 25th)

Send Email

Wait until August 30th

Send Email

Then, I accidentally scheduled it to start too early and launched the batch on August 11th.

So, after it had launched on August 11th, I went back in and edited the (active) flow:

Send email

Wait until August 25th

Send Email

Wait until August 30th

Send Email

Will this work? Will it pick up the new steps? Or, because it had already launched prior to the edit, is it just going to do whatever it was going to do already?

Thanks!

Andrew

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

2 replies

Devraj_Grewal
Level 10
August 25, 2016

Andrew,

The simple answer is this: if leads are already in a wait step, they will wait the full duration designated at the time they entered that wait step. If you change the wait step duration, it will instantly be active for new leads entering that flow, but those already in that wait step wait the full duration designated at the time they entered the wait step.

Ex. If a lead enters a 3 day wait step and is on their last day and the wait step changes to 2 days now, that lead will still wait the full 3 days.

Ex. If a lead enters a 2 day wait step and is on their last day and the wait step changes to 3 days now, that lead will still wait only 2 days.

August 25, 2016

OK, got it. So, to get that Aug 25th email out the way I wanted to, I'd need to create a standalone batch campaign. OK, thanks!

Andrew

Devraj_Grewal
Level 10
August 25, 2016

If leads have already received the email on the 11th, they will not be able to receive the same email again.

Level 7
January 5, 2017

Does really any change to the flow take effect as long as someone has not entered that step in the flow?

Grégoire_Miche2
Level 10
January 5, 2017

Hi Nate,

No changes will also affect the leads that are in a wait step in the middle of the flow.

In the case above, what Andrew did is quite dangerous because adding a wait step before the wait step will change the numbering of the steps which will impact the leads that get out of the now second wait step.

-Greg