20 Being added in between Email Address token in unsubscribe URL | Community
Skip to main content
January 29, 2014
Question

20 Being added in between Email Address token in unsubscribe URL

  • January 29, 2014
  • 5 replies
  • 1335 views
%20 keeps being added in between Email Address token in unsubscribe URL. We have custom pages set up for unsubscribe to manage preferences, and pass the email address in this URL. I went and edited the link and now it won't let me approve an email because of a %20 in between "Email%20Address"

Thoughts please
This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

5 replies

January 29, 2014

I've seen this happening a lot too, and I don't remember it being the correct behavior. Maybe Marketo can chime in. 

I've been fixing it in the HTML and it has approved fine.

January 29, 2014
In this situation, you can open the email and click on HTML icon on email editor. Manually remove the %20 character and then save the email. It should get reflected.
January 29, 2014
Sorry I should mention that these footers are built in snippets and added in a dynamic content section, so I wouldn't be able to change the HTML from the email template.
January 29, 2014
Okay I fixed the issue by editing all the HTML for my snippet footer in Dreamweaver, and then pasted it back into the HTML section of the snippet and saving and approved. Worked.

Why is this an issue?

If Marketo knows that it can't approve an email with a character in a broken token, why shouldn't it know to not allow it to be inserted in the first place?
 
Sean_Tierney2
Level 3
January 29, 2014
I'm having a similiar issue with the %20 popping up in tokens within URLs. Most recently with a hyperlinked {{member.webinar url}} token. It's weird because it has all been working for quite some time. Wonder if the latest release is causing a bug? At least in the meantime Jasons suggestion of editing the HTML did the trick, but I'm worried there are other emails out there where the token is incorrect now. The number of programs to review would be astronomical...