.infinity.json is providing the expected result | Community
Skip to main content
November 15, 2018
Solved

.infinity.json is providing the expected result

  • November 15, 2018
  • 4 replies
  • 1798 views

I am using AEM 6.3 and trying to get the response from the /mnt/override/<absolute-path>.infinity.json. When I hit the servlet the initial response is fine. But when I change the property value in the node and hit the servlet it's showing the previous result. But when I change the property value of a different node and try it's working fine. I tried recompiling jsp and rebuilding the clientlibs. Is the inifinity.json getting cached some where in AEM or the /apps/myproject/components/mycomponent is getting cached? Help would be greatly appreciated

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by joerghoh

It's not cached. Depending on your setup you might have a dispatcher cache sitting in front of AEM and that might cache it (would be unusal though). Have you refreshed your browser. And are you sure that you saved your change?

4 replies

joerghoh
Adobe Employee
joerghohAdobe EmployeeAccepted solution
Adobe Employee
November 15, 2018

It's not cached. Depending on your setup you might have a dispatcher cache sitting in front of AEM and that might cache it (would be unusal though). Have you refreshed your browser. And are you sure that you saved your change?

November 15, 2018

Thanks for the reply Jorg. No dispatcher is configured and I am directly hitting the app server and I am clearing the browser cache as well. To be more precise I am hitting the <component node path>.infinity.json and I am changing the property value in one of the nodes under cq:dialog. But when I hit the <node path>.infinity.json where I changed the property value it's showing proper results

smacdonald2008
Level 10
November 15, 2018

THis is interesting - can you test on a fresh AEM instance in your DEV environment and see if you get the same results.

November 15, 2018

Thanks for the reply Scott. I am looking at the wrong node which is similar to this one.