Does replication.content.useFileStorage work reliably? | Community
Skip to main content
OldOldOld
OldOldOld
Level 2
October 16, 2015
Solved

Does replication.content.useFileStorage work reliably?

  • October 16, 2015
  • 1 reply
  • 970 views

Hi all,

we tried enabling replication.content.useFileStorage in /system/console/configMgr/com.day.cq.replication.impl.ReplicationContentFactoryProviderImpl to improve the speed of replication and also to keep some temporary data out of the repository.

It seems to work in principle but we have discovered 2 issues:

  • for clustered environments (more than 1 publisher) it seems not to reliably replicate to all publishers
  • lots of *.ser and *.ser.status files left over in the crx-quickstart/replication folder, despite the content havin been successfully replicated to the publisher node. These seem to remain around and not being cleaned up, eventually filling up the disk

My questions:

  1. has anyone used this successfully in a production environment for a longer time (CQ 5.6.1)?
  2. is there anything specific to watch out for when using this feature (we also use workflows with replication on the author)?
This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by Sham_HC

*  It is not meant for cluster please do not use. 

*   Temporary workaround use cron job to cleanup & file a daycare to fix it.  

1 reply

Sham_HC
Sham_HCAccepted solution
Level 10
October 16, 2015

*  It is not meant for cluster please do not use. 

*   Temporary workaround use cron job to cleanup & file a daycare to fix it.  

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...