Hi i'd also like to point out that our application can also have high pick of concurrent connections (several hundreds), and if the pricing changes to a high price only because of number of concurrent connections, it will totally break our business model based on LCCS pricings which did not took it ...

Hi Jeff,thanks a lot for your reply. Thats really great news.The only last remaining question is how the pricing calculation will be affected?Regards,Seb

Thanks Jeff,Very good news.But when an official announcement will be done, once the deal is complete, it would be important that Adobe officially guaranty that the service will not be shut down on Adobe side, before the new service is fully running on the new side.And don't forget that a lot of peop...

Hi Jeff, good to ear that discussions are going on.But would you have a timeframe (at least a rough one).Do you think that in 1 month from now, we should have definitive answer that would be positive or negative?Thanks.I know its hard question, but as Adobe fixed the 9 month deadline, time is runnin...

http://www.fluorinefx.com/ sounds very promising. Anyone tried it? It would be great to also share the hosting solutions too. For example if i need to use BlazeDS and Red5 in place of LCCS, how should i host the services easely? As one of the main interests of LCCS was the "no server side worries".

hi Jeff, thanks a lot for answering.Its more clear about 1000$ limit for me now But what exactly is the amount of work to clean up the server side code? Can anyone else than Adobe help to do the clean up? Is Adobe evaluating this possibility to clean up the server side code to get LCCS work in stand...

Hi Jeff,Your mail said that a 1000$ free usage was granted, and no PPU account will be charged, but what happens if our business get an usage above 1000$ ?About the 3 solutions proposed:Open Source. I read the following in another old thread "and in any case the application has large ties with our c...

Ok thanks,Its all clear now.Seb

Hello,Thanks for the answer.But your example is to simple to make it crystal clear.I mean: if in one room, i have two private discussions:User 1 is publishing webcam and audio to User 2.User 2 is publishing webcam and audio to User 1.I count: 1*2 = 2. Ok?But if in same time in same room i also have ...

Hello,I'd like to be sure to know precisly how is count the limitation of 3 p2p streams.Does the limitation of 3 p2p streams apply only for one user, or for the whole room?For example in room 1, i haveuser 1 publish webcam stream to user 2 and user 2 publish webcam stream to user 1user 3 publish web...