Prince Shivhare wrote... you can also try. In the parent pom.xml: <dependency>                <groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>                <artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>                <version>6.2.0-SP1</version>                <scope>provided</scope>                <classifier>apis</classifi...

BjornEricsson wrote... I Think that I used the wrong wording in my original post. I want to detect server type in a Workbench Process. Is that doable with this approach?  What do you mean by "server type" if not author vs. publisher? or dev/testing environment vs PROD environment?Both of these scena...

smacdonald2008 wrote... See this community article -- https://edivad.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/whats-my-cq-run-mode/  If wordpress is blocked by anyone else's corporate proxy (like ours), here's the core of that article:/* * EditMode.js * * Simple javascript object meant to be used within a CQ develo...

In ClassicUI's SiteAdmin panel, there was a column for Template. Does nothing like this exist in TouchUI?I honestly can't seem to find a single way to determine what template a specific page is using in TouchUI. I'm considering overlaying /libs/cq/gui/components/coral/admin/page/columnpreview/column...

Arun,We're using the Unobfuscated 6.2 Uber-jar.<dependency> <groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId> <artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId> <version>6.2.0</version> <classifier>apis</classifier> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency>

Any chance that Adobe will implement a hotfix for this? I know it's just a warning but seeing it pop up all the time bothers me.I honestly don't know enough about Oak to know for sure, but it seems this was addressed with OAK-4139[1]?[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4139

Thanks for both replies, Peter, very helpful!Quick question, did you intentionally delete the one about the OSGi book?

smacdonald2008 wrote... I would go the @Service approach.   Any idea if there is any sort of performance degradation* from doing this simply to provide the @Reference capability to a class/interface? Couldn't tell just from looking at the documentation[1].* other than a couple extra <service> declar...

ptK wrote... Gdubz wrote... Hi ptK, Firstly, WCMUse[1] is deprecated, use WCMUsePojo[2] instead. Secondly, is there any particular reason you're using a ModifiableValueMap[3] to READ values? You should really just be using a regular ValueMap[4] instead, if you can help it. In the event that y...