Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

Endoriel
Community profile Endoriel Level 3
Job title here
Location here
13 BADGES
Level 3

Level 3

Learn more
Joined the community 08-10-2014 3:29:28 AM
Offline
Top badges earned by Endoriel
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile
Re: Setting available components in policy for nested parsys in AEM 6.4
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Before it was easy since any parsys on the page could be configured in design mode and then you could just import the node structure generated in etc/designs/project/template into your project. Right now with policies things don't really work as I would expect. It's very simple to test this. Just create an empty component and in it's component.html add or Drag this new component onto one of your pages. I couldn't find a way to configure the parsys in the component with policies. If I create the...

Views

2.5K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Setting available components in policy for nested parsys in AEM 6.4
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
I know it's in conf ...I think I already tried about 30 different node structures in my policy and template. I can set the policy on my component if I add a design dialog. I don't know how to set the policy on the parsys inside my component. Also if I include a parsys with data-sly-resource in a page with templated content I see 2 parsys. I think I need to extend the parsys/responsivegrid otherwise it won't work.

Views

2.5K

Likes

0

Replies

2
Setting available components in policy for nested parsys in AEM 6.4
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Hi,I have a classic case of a container component that I can drag into the main layout container. My container component contains another layout container (parsys/responsivegrid).I am able to configure the policy for main layout container on the page but I couldn't find a way to set a policy for the layout container in my component. Prior to AEM 6.4 I would do this in /etc/designs but that folder doesn't even exist in AEM 6.4 and I don't want to create one and handle this in a legacy way.Any sug...

Views

2.8K

Likes

0

Replies

4
Re: AEM 6.2 classic : Threshold plugin with textfield xtype
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
The way I see it you have these options and you should go with whichever you feel is apropriate:- just set the max length in your textfield or add a description advising the author the recommended number of characters - this saves development time but adds some responsibility on the authors- implement something custom using the textfield with similar functionality - this is your ideal option but requires the most development work- use the existing plugin in an rte with all other options removed/...

Views

769

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.4 - Touch UI: The height of the #ContentFrame keeps growing in edit mode
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
How are you including your clientlib? cq-layer-activated is an event in the editor not in your page so you need to add the category cq.authoring.editor.sites.page.hookOtherwise this works for me:(function ($, ns, channel, window, undefined) { "use strict"; channel.on('cq-layer-activated', function (event) { console.log('cq-layer-activated', event); });}(jQuery, Granite.author, jQuery(document), this));

Views

3.4K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.4. Retrieve values from another dialog.
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't really see what's complicated here. From your latest explanations it doesn't seem to be anything to do with dialogs and displaying values from one in the other, rather displaying content created for your card components in your card list component. If the card components and the card list have the same parent you can just create a custom injector or add a post construct method in your model for the card list. In this method you get the parent resource of y...

Views

2.8K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.4 - Touch UI: The height of the #ContentFrame keeps growing in edit mode
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
My advice is to try either:Create a clientlib only loaded in Author and overwrite your styles by setting an acceptable fixed height or a max-height if that's possibleCreate a clientlib only loaded in Author, overwrite your vh style and then resize your elements with JavaScript to their correct size. If you have anything dynamic try doing it in the "cq-contentframe-layout-change" event.The problem is that your page is loaded in an iframe and it's important to have a predetermined fixed height. Th...

Views

3.4K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.4. Retrieve values from another dialog.
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
From what I understand you basically want a dynamic dropdown.Once dialog A is saved - it just becomes content so what you want in the B component is to dynamically populate your dropdown with values based on content. For that there are a lot of examples. It was just answered here: Select value in dropdown in touch ui dialog based on the value selected in editable template (You need to determine the values in Java by traversing your content and picking up those card names).

Views

2.8K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: How to add multiple values for the rootpath in TouchUI path browser?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Would this help? ContextualPathBrowserOtherwise I suggest looking into implementing a custom predicate or a JavaScript solution. There are some suggestions in here

Views

1.0K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.2 Classic : Capture comments in default email template used by workflow
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
It should work with ${item.data.comment} since from code doing workflow.getWorkItems().get(0).getMetaDataMap().get("comment") would return the comment and in the template context "item.data" is just workItem.getMetaDataMap() so I'm not sure. I will test it later. Are you sure you are editing the correct template? Can you add successfully some of the other available variables?If you can't get it to work I would suggest implementing your own custom version of the EMailNotificationService which is ...

Views

697

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.2 Classic : Capture comments in default email template used by workflow
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Hi,Can you try ${item.node.data.comment} ?If not, I can try to suggest some other options.

Views

698

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.4 - Touch UI: The height of the #ContentFrame keeps growing in edit mode
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
The issue was that I was trying to overlay an invisible component added at the bottom of the page on top of the app by using position: absolute and height: 100% and this was causing the infinite resize. I went with a javascript solution instead and it seems to work.Actually just adding any blank component to a blank page - if the component has a dialog and the component has position absolute and height 100% - this will cause an infinite ContentFrame height resize in the AEM TouchUI authoring int...

Views

3.5K

Like

1

Replies

1
Re: How to show different welcome screen based on Group access in AEM 6.3?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
I think achieving this as a CMS customisation would be difficult and also applying the authoringMode at group level would be tricky.I would probably do this as a Filter with an OSGI configuration where you could add the user groups that go to classic vs touch. The filter would redirect to /cf# or /editor.html for pages and to /siteadmin or /aem/start.html for the landing page.

Views

721

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: AEM 6.2 Classic UI : Query regarding restricting groups from initiating workflows.
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
This should work by restricting access to the specific workflow model for the user group that shouldn't be able to initiate the workflow (/etc/workflow/models/mycustomworkflow on AEM 6.2). This group should still have access to the /etc/workflow/instances to be able to see and complete steps in the workflow.

Views

542

Likes

0

Replies

0
AEM 6.4 - Touch UI: The height of the #ContentFrame keeps growing in edit mode
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Hi,I have seen similar issues have been addressed on the forum for AEM 6.1 and 6.2. The resolution was either eliminating relative sizes from the custom CSS or installing a hotfix. I seem to have a similar issue in AEM 6.4.I can't see any CSS clash. Is there an existing known issue for AEM 6.4 related to this? My page contains an angular app. After the initial content load in edit mode the height on the ContentFrame iframe and ContentWrapper div increases to infinity.Any help would be very much ...

Views

6.2K

Likes

2

Replies

10
Re: Using AEM with Okta (with increased session duration)
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
As far as I know once the user is authenticated with the IdP via the SAML request, in AEM you still get a token created and associated with the crx session. Every subsequent request is authenticated via the CRX Token Authentication Handler first before going to the SSO Handler unless you changed the JAAS rankings. So you should be able to set the AEM session timeout via the Token Configuration and this can be different from Okta.Since you mentioned this authentication happens on publish instance...

Views

3.6K

Likes

2

Replies

0
Re: Issue posting files from another application to AEM in 6.3
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
I think you probably found the root of your issue. It seems to me that your POST request is being sent directly to the Sling Post Servlet on the publish server without any authentication so it defaults to anonymous user (part of everyone group) and this user doesn't have write permissions for that path (/content/******/files). Alternatively you might be missing some of the details Sling Post Servlet requires to service your request and create the new resources in the JCR or the path doesn't actu...

Views

903

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Scheduling publication of multiple page versions
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Just an idea - I think this might be possible just using the Scheduled Page/Asset Activation workflow. You can try this in your dev environment:- Make the first change to your page, then from the sites interface ( http://localhost:4502/sites.html ) select the page then click on Manage Publication then in the dialog click on Later and chose the time for publication.- Make the subsequent changes on the same page and schedule their publication using the same process.I think this will work because d...

Views

1.3K

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Any plans for JDK 9 compatibility?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Thank you for the suggestion Jörg. This was not in relation to a particular project or a specific case, which would be better suited in a Daycare ticket like you mentioned.It's just a generic question. I was hoping that it might be common knowledge in Adobe if this is likely to come in the near future and something that one of the active staff members in here could share with us. It would definitely be good to have some idea if it's likely to happen or not when planning for existing and new proj...

Views

793

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Any plans for JDK 9 compatibility?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Jörg already mentioned that and reiterating it doesn't answer my question which is if we should expect to pay Oracle support licence for Java 8 updates from 2019 or is Adobe doing anything to move to a newer JDK in the next 6 months.

Views

791

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Any plans for JDK 9 compatibility?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
Good point Jörg. But still my question remains. Should we expect anything from Adobe in terms of support for JDK 9-10-11 in the next 6 months?

Views

794

Likes

0

Replies

0
Any plans for JDK 9 compatibility?
Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 3
Endoriel
Level 3

Likes

7 likes

Total Posts

22 posts

Correct reply

5 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
View profile
Endoriel
- Adobe Experience Manager
As enterprises will require a paid licence from Oracle to continue getting security updates for Java SE 8 after January 2019 and there is no option currently to run AEM on JDK 9 - what is the recommendation from Adobe? Is there any plan to make AEM 6.4 compatible with Java 9? Should enterprises just accept the added cost or continue running AEM on the last publicly available version of JDK 8 regardless of any security vulnerabilities discovered post January 2019?

Views

1.9K

Likes

0

Replies

8
Likes given to