Hi nnakirikanti,Please find the answers here as you requested.1. We use snowflake source connector for batch ingestion.2. For incremental data we use timestamp column.3. We are doing the data preparation during the mapping for '_id' field and map with uuid() function.

Hi arpang16406580,We are using the 'timestamp' field for the incremental load, but if we checking todays new records as per timestamp at source end it's minimum count but in AEP as we schedule the incremental load every time FULL LOAD is happening.Might be the possibility apart from the timestamp fi...

Hi team,Recently I did the batch data ingestion with enabling the incremental load. Once the incremental load work as on daily basis for each batch ID against the records get ingested into the dataset but all records only reflect under the New Profile Fragments as new records and Zero records reflec...

@NimashaJain, Thanks for the opportunity. Kindly consider for Aspirants category. 

Hi dwright, Thank you for responseWe are just doing some testing so I just what to understand something more on that so that's why I asked such question.   Thanks

Hi dwright,Thanks for responseYes I understand the merge policy and also I'm again watching above video as you suggested but before that few more doubt Consider Schema 1 - Identifier is Customer_IDSchema 2 - Identifier is Employer ID  so apart from that no any SK so as per my knowledge profile stitc...

Hi AvinashGupta01,I understood these field groups like Demographics Details & Personal Contact Details are created for reusability and can be used in multiple schemas but consider the scenario both schema having firstName & lastName attribute so during the exporting the data at destination side poss...

Hello Everyone,please help me understand more on below scenarioIf we are using the same OOTB field (like Demographics Details & Personal Contact Details) in 2 different schema for each schema having different Identifier so definitely it will impact while exporting the profiles from destinations corr...

Hi chetanyajain,I'm also thinking the same Adobe changed something recently might be that's the reason we are unable to add the custom field under the Marketing Preferences.Anyway I have already raised the ticket for Adobe to understand the more...Let's wait for revert from Adobe.However, I will try...

Hi team,We are building the new schema during we noticed we are unable to add CFG under the Consent and Preference Details (Standard Field) -> Marketing Preference (object). As we did earlierCould you please help me on this.please find the below snap for reference Regards,Sandip