While creating analysis workspace dashboard for my first Auto Target
activity reporting it became aparent that the Experience names as we
define within AT test settings in Adobe Target do not show in A4T report
(it only shows Expereince A, Experience B, etc. though that is now how
the names are managed in Target and its reporting tab). Anything we can
do to expose the activity name as dimension value? Any solution for
replicating tables like these in tutorial (link below) that can show
diemnsion...
Got that worked out, that the latter (-12.98% / 74.82%) would be where
we should look for. A bit confusing that there should be activity level
value (aggregate?) for those metrics, if they are not relevant.
It may be such a basic question but there has been a few different
interpretation of this, so can you please help clarify. When we look at
A/B test report generated through A4T panel, like the example on the
documentation:
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/analyze/analysis-workspace/panels/a4t-panel.html?lang=en#Output
Lift (Mid point), -1.78% Confidence, 46.27% Or, are we supposed to read
the Experience A (not control) rowLift: -12.98%Confidence: 74.82% Thank
you for your help! ...
Hi @ryanr701 Thank you for your detailed response. Much appreciated. I
understand the points you listed, and that is exactly what I expected
the best practice to be. In a way, my question is also thrown towards
users and consultants of customers using this solution, to see if there
is any comment on what else they might have found to be useful, when
faced with the situation of the landing page x anonymous users
combination.
Auto-target / auto-personalisation experts! Can you please help!! We
recently started running an AP on a brand website, where our visitors
are not mostly not authenticated (anonymous). After 15 days of ML
training period, we got a list of ML segments, but majority of segments
were based on browser, user OS, screen size, etc. We do not believe
those would have had impact on the way visitors responded or not
responded to half a dozen offers we put in mix. Can you give me
suggestions on how we can ...
Hi @warrensanderI came across your comment and this topic just now,
while deciding how to deal with similar situation to the original topic
poster (somebody leaves organisation, who used to create components and
projects that need to be reused). Has there been any changes to how this
'breaking relationship between project and components' etc. as issues
when chaning ownerhsip of those assets to another user? Is it still a
recommended solution that a shared account be used to park such
components ...
Thanks @gaureshk3014423 !Would I be right to assume, in the scenarios
above (banner, page content, and another section within the same page
each having its own Target Activity scope), do they need to be on the
same priority level (same page, same priority level) in order for all of
them to kick in? What happens if it is difficult to keep priority level
across multiple experiences on the same page? e.g. emergency contact
link as multi-page overlay at priority 999 (assuming it uses a separate
elem...
Hi there. I found a couple of similar questions from 2-3 years back. But
I think my question is a little different. We are looking to accommodate
Target Activities of different initiatives and structure within the same
page. For example, 1) banner section is changed based on previous page
content of user2) primary content section below is swapped according to
target audiences (audience A gets personalised content for A, audience B
sees different content for that same section in the page) 3) A/B ...
I'm trying to make a simple dashboard with requirements that look like
this: Unique visitorsHad impression of one of multiple Target
Activities, with Acitivity name contains text 'xyz' The above-mentioned
Target Activities were seen in a sub-domain of website, which can be
identifieid by page contains text 'abc'Now, when I tried to make this in
calculated metrics/manual stack segment in analysis workspace, it
included far wider range of users, as it was not possible to isolate
Target Activity of...
