Yes I guess that is correct from a programming standpoint, no error
there. But how do I get it to fire only when the submit is successful?
Like Core > Form Submit AND "No Errors"
UPDATE: The rule is firing properly. The set variable action wasn't set
properly so the eVar was being populated with "null" . Now the problem
is the rule fires every time the form is submitted. Including if you
leave the fields blank, click submit, and the page reloads with required
field errors.
Seems like a basic function of launch so not sure what I am doing wrong.
I have created a rule in Launch with an event = Core-Submit. I tried
setting it to a specific element = #pardot-form which is the ID in the
code. I then switched it to "any element" and it still did not fire. I
have no conditions set and the actions are to set variables and send the
adobe analytics beacon. When I look at the adobe debugger on the form
page, you can see the launch tag on the form is working as context data
i...
We are seeing utm_campaign parameters related to paid campaigns in the
drill down for visits from a last touch channel of direct. I read other
posts and made sure our direct channel was not set to override which it
is not. Should we be seeing paid campaigns in Direct visits?
We are seeing utm_campaign parameters related to paid campaigns in the
drill down for visits from a last touch channel of direct. I read this
post
https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/marketing-channels-problem/qaq-p/307897
and made sure our direct channel was not set to override which it is
not. Should we be seeing paid campaigns in Direct visits?
We are seeing utm_campaign parameters related to paid campaigns in the
drill down for visits from a last touch channel of direct. I read this
post
https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/marketing-channels-problem/qaq-p/307897
and made sure our direct channel was not set to override which it is
not. Should we be seeing paid campaigns in Direct visits?
We are seeing utm_campaign parameters related to paid campaigns in the
drill down for visits from a last touch channel of direct. I read this
post
https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/marketing-channels-problem/qaq-p/307897
and made sure our direct channel was not set to override which it is
not. Should we be seeing paid campaigns in Direct visits?
So after I wrote this, cathartic I guess, I figured out what to do.
Check this out, by creating segments for each step and including each
successive step in each segment I was able to match counts. The segment
for step 2 looks like this: Then by the 5th segment I have 5 page names.
What's cool about this is I can set the segments to "Then Within" 1
visit, day, week etc.
The ultimate goal here is to show a table of 200 geographic business
units with their fallout % at each step of the purchase process so we
can look for anomalies. In a fallout chart I can add the business units
and show the comparison in the chart but more than 10 at a time is too
much. So how could i get it to something like this? The CSV export
doesn't provide the columns & rows properly besides the fact that adding
200 BUs to the chart for export is not possible. Building a free form
table do...
One other question. If we have to implement CCPA/GDPR opt-in/out code as
a condition on the tags would I still want 1 general page view tag since
I don't need Adobe Analytics to be wrapped by the privacy code, just
Linked-In and Facebook and others like that.
What is best practice here? I have to report pageviews to LinkedIn,
Facebook, MediaIQ, Adobe Analytics, etc. Do I use 1 "Global: Page Views"
rule with all the vendors in the action section? or Separate rules for
each, like Facebook: Page Views, LinkedIn: Page Views, etc? I would
think 1 rule firing them all is more efficient but if I have to change
one, like linked in, I'd have to republish it for all.
We have been seeing orders and revenue recorded in our Adobe Analytics
production environment that were completed in a staging environment. The
IT team thinks they have narrowed it down to a change in the DTM tag and
is fixing it. But now I'd like to filter out any transactions in
workspaces that came from these environments. The only idea I came up
with was to use our Order ID variable as it seems all the erroneous
transactions have an order ID of 5 digits instead of 6. Is there a way
to say Or...
We would like to see budget numbers for things like revenue that are
forecasted by our financial team in Adobe to see how well we are doing
YoY and against budget. These budget items are only specific to a
monthly total and broken out by customer types. I would think there
would be a way to import an excel sheet with a month/year column and a
revenue column to map to a "Budget Revenue" metric?
Paid Search Detection is set to Search engine = any with all the
following rules. direct is not set to override last-touch asking our
developers about the PWA, will edit this once I hear back.
This is interesting and hard to tell if there is an issue because the
majority of our traffic is from chrome or safari, so you'll see both
have a divergence in the last touch channel.Browser Type = AppleBrowser
Type = GoogleAlso unique visitors vs visits doesn't show a significant
divergence
Thank you for the reply. I'm pretty sure the rules are defaulted so no
problem displaying here. And here is the last touch report in numbers by
dayand by week
Yes you are correct, the first is marketing channels. It's actually
called Last Touch Report if that matters but it is breaking it down by
marketing channels. The admin logs show nothing in February for the
report suites log or admin log. The usage and access log show an API
call hitting on 2/22It starts on the 21st with API operation
'WebServices\Classifications.CreateImport'and then on the 22nd repeats
this: API operation 'WebServices\Classifications.CommitImport'Marketing
channel rules did no...
For some reason we saw a large divergence in our direct vs natural
channels on February 22 according to Adobe. We have checked all release
notes and tags to see if anything may have been changed to create this
divergence and have found nothing. Also when viewing channels using
Google analytics we see there are no changes in the trending of direct
vs organic. I realize raw numbers will not match between Adobe & Google
but trending should if users truly were coming directly vs searching. So
to me ...
We have moved on to using Workspaces as our display. The full screen
functionality of chrome works, but we had to enable a browser plugin to
refresh the data every 10 minutes. It works most of the time but require
user intervention at least 1x per day due to a login time out or adobe
stuck refreshing the data.
Very new to adobe analytics and trying to figure out how to load or pull
in offline sales data to count towards our total revenue and orders. For
example: In July we sold 10 widgets online for $100 total. But 5 more
people filled out a form online and a sales rep sold them widgets for an
additional 5 orders at $50 total. Adobe as is only can show $100 & 10
orders. How can I bring in the others to show TOTAL = $150 and 15
orders?If it helps, the offline lead sales are completed in Salesforce.
I s...
I followed this video Date Comparisons in Analysis Workspace | Adobe
Analytics - YouTube but when right clicking in my workspace, on a
metric, I only have "add time period column". Is there a feature or
something that has to be turned on?
Thank you for the instructions on setting my display resolution in
Windows 10. The television is set at 1920x1080 at 60Hz. The issue is the
adobe dashboard as seen in the attached screenshot where it is not
expanding to the full screen
When clicking the full-screen button on our real-time dashboard the html
doesn't scale properly giving us slider bars up & down and left and
right. We have tried changing screen resolution, different browsers, and
zoom levels with no luck. The Real-time dashboard scales correctly on
computer monitors set at 1920x1080. The issue is when connected via HDMI
to a television monitor at any resolution, even 1920x1080.
