gkkhatal

Your achievements

0% to

Tip / to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new

Open Alerts Bar

Community profile gkkhatal Level 2

Job title here

Location here

5 BADGES

Learn more

Joined the community 13-07-2018 5:52:51 AM

Offline

View leaderboards

Profile

Trophy case

Top badges earned by gkkhatal

Affirm 1

Re: OOTB privilege render condition not working to show/h... - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello Arun So privilege rendercondition works fine on first load on particular path but does not work when user navigates in assets. That seems to be major drawback to the rendercondition feature. Do we have any workaround for this through any customization? Did not quite get your second part about denying access to /apps/dam/gui/content/assets/jcr:content/actions/selection/custom. Can you please elaborate? Thanks

156

Re: Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types - Adobe Experience Manager

Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S Thanks, this worked fine for us. Thanks for the solution and the clarity. Appreciate it! ThanksGanesh

202

Re: Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types - Adobe Experience Manager

Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S Thanks for the response. Below are the information you requested. While looking into it further, I feel the feature provided assumes that the any custom MIME types will need the inheritance and it "forces" these additional tabs and properties through inheritance. This is bit odd and it would have been nice to have a option to break the inheritance rather than having custom implementation 😞 Any ideas how we can achieve this through custom implementation. 1. I am using AEM 6.5...

264

Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello All We want to create custom metadata forms for custom mimetypes. But as per current implementation, that has to be present inside "default" folder and which forces to add default tab via inheritance. Is there a way to create these forms without inheritance OR to create them outside of default folder for custom MIME type. Note that "Apply folder" will not work as we want the form based on MIME type of the asset and not based on the parent folder due to content organization of the business.

307

Re: Attaching Metadata Schema based on DITA Topics in XML Documentation Addon - Adobe Experience Manager Assets

Any pointers in this issue?

180

Attaching Metadata Schema based on DITA Topics in XML Documentation Addon - Adobe Experience Manager Assets

Hello All We are using XML Documentation plugin and there are company specific topics as part of specialization. We would want to attach metadata schema based on the topic and not by predefined path. How can we achieve this? Is this supported OOTB? Currently the metadata schema forms can be attached to predefined folder paths which becomes static. We want to attach different metadata schema forms based on the topic types instead of path. ThanksGanesh

265

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello @Vijayalakshmi_S, This finally worked. Thanks a lot for your time in this. Appreciate it! Just a curious question. Is there relevant documentation/info about it? Looks like I was heading a wrong direction as I was not able to find precise info. The previous approach was really extracting the zip archive so did not think of changing the appraoch, thinking there was issue in calling the arguments. Thanks again!Ganesh

3.7K

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S, I tried it. But the workflowMetadata will set the values at workflow level and not to the process step level. I tried it anyways and it shows correctly in /var/workflow/instances, but that does not work as expected and the workflow still takes default values. I tried to log the process level arguments(Set via process arguments in WF model) and this is how it shows. Note there are 2 items and the arguments are shown against PROCESS_ARGS:{PROCESS_ARGS=removeOriginal::true,upda...

4.3K

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

29.05.2020 17:39:01.265 *INFO* [JobHandler: /var/workflow/instances/server0/2020-05-18/unzip-metadata-zip_565:/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess scan: scanning archive [/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] and verifying configured limits 29.05.2020 17:39:01.265 *INFO* [JobHandler: /var/workflow/instances/server0/2020-05-18/unzip-metadata-zip_565:/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess scan: config...

2.8K

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

No @hamidk92094312, there are no errors. The workflow works perfectly fine. The logs show it is taking default values. Below is the debug log:

2.8K

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello @hamidk92094312, I am using AEM6.5. I have enabled debug logging and I am still seeing default arguments and not the provided arguments

2.8K

Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

Thanks for your response. I tried this but still its taking the default arguments and not the provided arguments 😞

4.5K

Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello All I have created a new workflow and have added a "DAM Unarchiver Process"(com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess) step in it. The workflow works fine and does its job. E.g. when I upload a zip file, it extracts the contents by creating a new folder. However, I am not able to set additional arguments which it supports. I want to set removeOriginal=true and updateMode=OVERWRITE. When I set these arguments from process step, those don't get applied. I tried following syntaxes to set ...

7.0K

Manage sequence and validations of form fields when created from ACS Commons MCP package - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello All We are extending the Generic Lists provided in ACS Commons package. The current Generic Lists form is built using MCP package where we can define fields using annotations. But its not clear how to manage the sequence of the fields in this package. The form is built with random sequence of form fields. Can it be controlled? Also how we can validations to these fields? MCP package does not have a annotation or options to add validation. Please help Ganesh

2.2K

Re: [New] Welcome to AEM Community! Please Introduce Yourself - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello AllI am Ganesh Khatal working as Technical Manager at Globant. I have total 14 years of experience in ECM domain and have 4 years of experience into AEM. I have been following this group since quite a long time now, but putting my intro bit late. I found this community quite happening and supportive. Happy to be part of it.ThanksGanesh

20.6K

Need help in testing and understanding how criteria's in Recommendations work - Adobe Target

Hi AllWe are trying to implement basic Recommendations feature. While creating the Recommendations Activity we are using localhost AEM URLs.We are able to load the products feed. Each product has a page URL in the feed. The URLs are relative URLs in the feedWe created a new Activity with OOTB criteria - "Recently Viewed Products" and selected OOTB design 3x1The initial product grid is shown on the page.But when we try to hit other products multiple times, the list of products in grid does not ch...

3.0K

Re: Caching Behavior when setting headers in Sling Main Servlet - Adobe Experience Manager

Thanks Jörg for the answerI am clear with points #2 & #3. That makes sense.For #1 can you explain bit more in it. You mentioned there might be scenarios in which we may set the headers through code. But that is contradictory to our scenario where we are setting it through OSGI configs.So it looks there are 3 ways to set the headers(at least) :1. Through code - Scenario when there is a specific business logic and we need to set through code2. Through Dispatcher - Most common scenario when headers...

3.2K

Caching Behavior when setting headers in Sling Main Servlet - Adobe Experience Manager

Hello AllThere is an option in Sling Main Servlet to specify HTTP headers through OSGI configs. I am wondering how these headers behave when pages are cached.What is the scenario to use this feature? Especially when we can manage the headers on dispatcher?Are headers are also cached when the pages are cached? If yes, where does the information gets stored on dispatcher webserver?If we store headers on dispatcher which headers will be preferred? ThanksGanesh

3.4K

Re: Configuring Smart Tags on a local AEM - Adobe Experience Manager Assets

Are you sure you are fulfilling the prerequisites mentioned in the link Configuring Smart Tags Cloud ServiceBefore you can use the Smart Content Service, ensure the following to create an integration on Adobe I/O:An Adobe ID account that has administrator privileges for the organization.The Smart Content Service service is enabled for your organization.ThanksGanesh

1.6K

Likes given to

User

Count

Likes from

User

Count

Learn

Documentation

Community

Support

Resources

Adobe account

Adobe