since ‎13-07-2018
‎14-08-2020
gkkhatal
Level 2
Re: Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S Thanks, this worked fine for us. Thanks for the solution and the clarity. Appreciate it! ThanksGanesh
26
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S Thanks for the response. Below are the information you requested. While looking into it further, I feel the feature provided assumes that the any custom MIME types will need the inheritance and it "forces" these additional tabs and properties through inheritance. This is bit odd and it would have been nice to have a option to break the inheritance rather than having custom implementation 😞 Any ideas how we can achieve this through custom implementation. 1. I am using AEM 6.5...
88
Views
1
Like
2
Answers
Limitation of Metadata forms for custom MIME types gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello All We want to create custom metadata forms for custom mimetypes. But as per current implementation, that has to be present inside "default" folder and which forces to add default tab via inheritance. Is there a way to create these forms without inheritance OR to create them outside of default folder for custom MIME type. Note that "Apply folder" will not work as we want the form based on MIME type of the asset and not based on the parent folder due to content organization of the business.
126
Views
0
Likes
4
Answers and Comments
Attaching Metadata Schema based on DITA Topics in XML Documentation Addon gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Hello All We are using XML Documentation plugin and there are company specific topics as part of specialization. We would want to attach metadata schema based on the topic and not by predefined path. How can we achieve this? Is this supported OOTB? Currently the metadata schema forms can be attached to predefined folder paths which becomes static. We want to attach different metadata schema forms based on the topic types instead of path. ThanksGanesh
127
Views
0
Likes
1
Answers and Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello @Vijayalakshmi_S, This finally worked. Thanks a lot for your time in this. Appreciate it! Just a curious question. Is there relevant documentation/info about it? Looks like I was heading a wrong direction as I was not able to find precise info. The previous approach was really extracting the zip archive so did not think of changing the appraoch, thinking there was issue in calling the arguments. Thanks again!Ganesh
3490
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hi @Vijayalakshmi_S, I tried it. But the workflowMetadata will set the values at workflow level and not to the process step level. I tried it anyways and it shows correctly in /var/workflow/instances, but that does not work as expected and the workflow still takes default values. I tried to log the process level arguments(Set via process arguments in WF model) and this is how it shows. Note there are 2 items and the arguments are shown against PROCESS_ARGS:{PROCESS_ARGS=removeOriginal::true,upda...
4121
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
29.05.2020 17:39:01.265 *INFO* [JobHandler: /var/workflow/instances/server0/2020-05-18/unzip-metadata-zip_565:/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess scan: scanning archive [/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] and verifying configured limits 29.05.2020 17:39:01.265 *INFO* [JobHandler: /var/workflow/instances/server0/2020-05-18/unzip-metadata-zip_565:/content/dam/ey/migration/Behavior.zip] com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess scan: config...
2524
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
No @hamidk92094312, there are no errors. The workflow works perfectly fine. The logs show it is taking default values. Below is the debug log:
2533
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello @hamidk92094312, I am using AEM6.5. I have enabled debug logging and I am still seeing default arguments and not the provided arguments
2562
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Re: Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Thanks for your response. I tried this but still its taking the default arguments and not the provided arguments 😞
4258
Views
0
Likes
0
Comments
Specifying arguments to UnarchiverProcess step gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello All I have created a new workflow and have added a "DAM Unarchiver Process"(com.day.cq.dam.core.process.UnarchiverProcess) step in it. The workflow works fine and does its job. E.g. when I upload a zip file, it extracts the contents by creating a new folder. However, I am not able to set additional arguments which it supports. I want to set removeOriginal=true and updateMode=OVERWRITE. When I set these arguments from process step, those don't get applied. I tried following syntaxes to set ...
6649
Views
1
Like
14
Answers and Comments
Manage sequence and validations of form fields when created from ACS Commons MCP package gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello All We are extending the Generic Lists provided in ACS Commons package. The current Generic Lists form is built using MCP package where we can define fields using annotations. But its not clear how to manage the sequence of the fields in this package. The form is built with random sequence of form fields. Can it be controlled? Also how we can validations to these fields? MCP package does not have a annotation or options to add validation. Please help Ganesh
2082
Views
0
Likes
1
Answers and Comments
Re: [New] Welcome to AEM Community! Please Introduce Yourself gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello AllI am Ganesh Khatal working as Technical Manager at Globant. I have total 14 years of experience in ECM domain and have 4 years of experience into AEM. I have been following this group since quite a long time now, but putting my intro bit late. I found this community quite happening and supportive. Happy to be part of it.ThanksGanesh
18634
Views
2
Likes
1
Replies
Need help in testing and understanding how criteria's in Recommendations work gkkhatal - Adobe Target
Hi AllWe are trying to implement basic Recommendations feature. While creating the Recommendations Activity we are using localhost AEM URLs.We are able to load the products feed. Each product has a page URL in the feed. The URLs are relative URLs in the feedWe created a new Activity with OOTB criteria - "Recently Viewed Products" and selected OOTB design 3x1The initial product grid is shown on the page.But when we try to hit other products multiple times, the list of products in grid does not ch...
2713
Views
2
Likes
1
Replies
Re: Caching Behavior when setting headers in Sling Main Servlet gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Thanks Jörg for the answerI am clear with points #2 & #3. That makes sense.For #1 can you explain bit more in it. You mentioned there might be scenarios in which we may set the headers through code. But that is contradictory to our scenario where we are setting it through OSGI configs.So it looks there are 3 ways to set the headers(at least) :1. Through code - Scenario when there is a specific business logic and we need to set through code2. Through Dispatcher - Most common scenario when headers...
2885
Views
0
Likes
1
Replies
Caching Behavior when setting headers in Sling Main Servlet gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager
Hello AllThere is an option in Sling Main Servlet to specify HTTP headers through OSGI configs. I am wondering how these headers behave when pages are cached.What is the scenario to use this feature? Especially when we can manage the headers on dispatcher?Are headers are also cached when the pages are cached? If yes, where does the information gets stored on dispatcher webserver?If we store headers on dispatcher which headers will be preferred? ThanksGanesh
3121
Views
0
Likes
3
Replies
Re: Configuring Smart Tags on a local AEM gkkhatal - Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Are you sure you are fulfilling the prerequisites mentioned in the link Configuring Smart Tags Cloud ServiceBefore you can use the Smart Content Service, ensure the following to create an integration on Adobe I/O:An Adobe ID account that has administrator privileges for the organization.The Smart Content Service service is enabled for your organization.ThanksGanesh
1250
Views
0
Likes
0
Answers