Hello All, I am working on a short-term project that was developed on
Archetype 10/13 on AEM6.2, because the maven version mentioned in the
main POM is an old versioned one. The Classic UI components are supposed
to be upgraded to Touch UI, so that it supports for AEM 6.5 too going
forward. In the process of upgrade, I have updated the POM file with the
required versions of the respective dependencies and that had been
successful upon code build. But when I tried upgrading classic ui
components ...
Hi Community Members, Trying to disable the component dialog edit
functionality, of a Sightly component, upon a certain condition. The
component should still be rendering its html, just that it disables
authoring of that component only. Was not able to get to it.Have an idea
about how that can be done for a Classic UI component in JSP, but was
checking if there is a way for us to do that for a component thats in
Sightly.Appreciate your help and time. Thanks in Advance.--Arvind
JaideepBrar - Thanks about that. I have validated that before my forum
post. The way I have written down my Classic and Touch UI fields are
mentioned below. The issue is, the rollover or the populating of value
when authored in Touch UI is not showing up on Classic and even when I
author it on Classic and submit it, again when I reopen the Classic
dialog the field doesn't get pre-populated with what's being authored a
moment ago. Classic UI: Touch UI: (Applying
valueFormat/storedValue didn't r...
Hi all,I have been seeing an issue on AEM 6.2 and couldn't find a
response to the below situation. Am working on converting the Classic UI
components to Touch UI. One of the component has a datepicker and the
value authored on Classic UI does render the data on Touch UI, but the
dialog doesn't get populated with data that's authored on Classic UI and
the same gets applied when we author on Touch dialog, the value doesn't
get populated in Classic UI dialog. For getting the Classic UI authored
dat...
We may not need to do that on /content/dam node, we need to overlay the
node
"/libs/dam/gui/content/assets/jcr:content/actions/secondary/create/items/fileupload"
to /apps/ and then update the sizeLimit property to whatever the value
you want to set the limit to and the value that you set will be in
bytes. That will work.
Vish.dhaliwal - I believe we cannot overlay the clientlibs, rather can
override by creating another clientlib in my project. Please correct me
if I am wrong. I tried creating a clientlib with the category
"dam.gui.coral.fileupload", it still picks up the
/libs/dam/gui/coral/components/commons/fileupload/clientlibs/fileupload/js/fileupload.js
and not my custom file located at
/etc/designs/myproject/clientlib-dam-coral/fileupload/fileupload.js Is
there anything missing, that you might think of?
Hi everyone,I am here applying a sizelimit property to the assets
uploaded in DAM, in Touch UI. Is there a way for us to change the error
message displayed on alert box? The current default message displayed is
more generic. Appreciate your help.Thanks in advance.
JaideepBrar,I followed the same steps before, but I did what you said
again. I have added an internal and external broken links in the rich
text editor. I don't see any activity in /etc/linkchecker.html. And
below is what I see in the logs.02.08.2019 11:55:25.243 *INFO* [CM Event
Dispatcher (Fire ConfigurationEvent:
pid=com.day.cq.rewriter.linkchecker.impl.LinkCheckerImpl)]
com.day.cq.rewriter.linkchecker.impl.LinkCheckerTask LinkChecker service
shut down02.08.2019 11:55:25.244 *DEBUG* [CM Even...
Hi JaideepBrar,I confirm that, the "Disable checking" is unchecked and
the default value for "Scheduler period" was changed to random values
and tried testing it and then had reset values. No luck yet. Was not
able to see anything related to link checker in logs nor in the link
checker tool console.
Hi all,I am trying to enable the link checker on my instance, because of
the concern of the broken links on the website. Is the link checker
enabled by default and does the events get triggered when we are
authoring the pages with say rich text field component? I have been
through quite a few articles that are on the web - for instance AEM Link
Checker : Comprehensive Guide , but there is nothing different than in
the configuration, that we have it on our AEM 6.2 instance, from what it
is mentio...
Hi dan.klco, That was a great article. Have a question - Does the link
checker behave differently for different versions of AEM (6.2/6.3/6.4),
in terms of performance wise for a huge content like for about 30,000
pages? Any thoughts??Thanks in advance.
Hi AnkurAhlawatHave a question - Does this link checker behave
differently for different versions of AEM instances, in terms of
performance wise for a huge content like for about 30,000 pages? Any
thoughts??By the way, that was a great article.
Hello Everyone,I was checking if there is any way for us to extract the
AEM Authors list? Basically I have to get the list of authors and their
last logged in, depending upon the result have to be doing a
house-keeping job.Thanks in advance. Arvind.
Hello Everyone,We have an issue facing since an year or so with the
Prod. We are on 6.1 SP2 with the instances being managed by Adobe.
Author and Publish both are on SSD. Author is experiencing high CPU
writes and the replication log is filling up with lots of workflow
replication process logs. This happens whenever we do a restore from the
backup and it affecting the Author performance. For time being we have
bumped up the size of the author instance to put it in safer condition
and restarting ...
Hi Andrew,Upon changing the the path to "/content/aaa" and
"/content/bbb" it still picks up the highest ranking SAML configuration
for all the websites login. As I said, its single IDP and multiple
SPID's in our scenario. Thanks,Arvind
Hi all,As per the business requirement, I am working on providing login
functionality for multiple websites on same AEM 6.1 SP2 Instance. We
already have a website which is configured with an IDP and SPID
accordingly. Now that there are few more websites added to the same
instance, we are in a process of providing login functionality for them.
We have a single IDP and multiple SPID's with respective rankings for
the websites. So upon creation of multiple SAML Configurations, the
handler picks up...
