thebenrobb​ Any chance this will be delivered this year? Watching for Santa...

philiplawrence I was surprised too, never know what edge cases folks are harboring!

Hi philiplawrence​ reasoning is we've dealt with some IT deptartments who won't serve over certain small sites over SSL due to this vuln Heartbleed - Wikipedia I know it sounds weird, but I've gotten this as direct feedback regarding some active/live properties which don't have any material informat...

FYI, we have a specific property which is never intended to be served over HTTPS for security reasons. It works fine with DTM, but with Launch, it doesn't not properly downgrade to HTTP, which means we cannot transition it cleanly to Launch.

Thanks jenn.kunz@33Sticks​ - good find and detail. Just tested a site which present this issue.

I think this might be related to rapid rollback

This is a major point. Right now, we have to resort to having a separate sandbox account so we can test for 1st level effects of these upgrades. That said, we do not always have time to do that, which means we delay/defer upgrading as long as possible. Tools upgrades are a major concern for us as we...

thebenrobb​ Great, will watch for future updates - this is a crucial, pain-reducing feature. Not having it tends to make one reluctant to use Launch until rollback is available. Do you think it would be available before the July DTM sunset on new property add capability?

Did this feature make it live? We saw a deprecated time option in DTM, but nothing mentioned for launch.

Definitely 2nd this - we use the notes field to comment on requestor/BU who exist outside of the marketing cloud, and also possible future time boundaries for a rule decommission, and other not so obvious requirements. This is a crucial capability across over 20 domain properties managed under DTM. ...