I agree 100%.  Even if Workspace eventually gets all of the functionality of Ad Hoc, which is wishful thinking, it still will cause huge delays for analysts because it is browser-based.

I agree, enough of the smiley faces.  This was a short-sighted decision based strictly off of saving Adobe a couple of bucks.There is no possible way that they will get Workspace to be an adequate replacement for Ad Hoc.

Adobe dismissed Ad Hoc as an unnecessary tool because only 8 percent of the users were using the tool.You would think that Adobe would know eight percent of their users is statistically significant.  It will be a small but very loyal segment that will not want to migrate to an inferior product.What ...

This is all about a cost savings for Adobe which is very unfortunate.  Yes just 8 percen of users use Ad Hoc, but they are the power adobe analysts who now will need to work with a tool made for the masses.  Might as well switch over to Google Analytics then if we have no say in keeping this tool.  ...

Thanks good to hear you can copy data directly in Workspace.  But the fact remains that a web based interface will be slower than Ad Hoc and it won’t have all of the functionality of Ad Hoc.

Downloading reports in Workspace is too time-consuming especially when Adobe servers are overwhelmed.  Ad Hoc is great because you can COPY THE DATA DIRECTLY without a download.  So we'll get the "Email this report to make it faster" and stare at our inboxes waiting for a report that would take a se...