Sabrina, What kind of volume are you looking at daily and weekly and is this a new process that your team is trying to build consistency and then the supervisor will no longer need to be on the proof in, let's say, 2 or 3 months? Some things to keep in mind are that if the volume is too high, then I doubt supervisors will really look at the proofs or even updates, the need is more CYOB rather than training reinforcement and a regular report would suffice. If the volume is lower then you have a higher chance for engagement by the supervisors and a document update that they're tagged in or being added as a Reviewer on the Proof would suffice. If your organization has a low accountability model, meaning the supervisors are accountable for what their direct reports do rather than the direct reports themselves, then I would lean towards the comment tagging being added as a Reviewer on a Proof model. This is also recommended if you have more junior or "green" personnel that you want to closely monitor. If your organization has a high accountability model, meaning the direct reports are accountable for what goes out and the supervisors just need to "be in the loop", then I would recommend going the report route which can be based on custom fields, doc naming conventions, or even Document Folder. Hope this helps, John Albaugh GP PRO