Just a thought about it, would the following set up work/:Every time someone applies for a job, set s.products and set the product ID to "JobApplication" and then pass all the other eVars I need, including JobID, company ID, discipline etc in the s.products string.This would mean I have one generic ...

So, in the s.products string, I would have something likes.products=;jobID123;eVar34=companyID_123;eVar28=CompanyName_ABC etc Is that correct? And I would need to set them as merchandising eVars?I still don't fully understand how classifications come into this? I understand what classifications are ...

Thanks.Our current eCommerce implementation is very simple, we only set a product ID, no other info, so if I set the product ID as the Job ID, would it show up in the same report?Also, what exactly do you mean by "Then all the metadata like Company, Location, Discipline, etc. gets uploaded as a Clas...

Hi Andrey,Thanks for your reply.The issue I have with using product ID is that we are already using product ID for our B2B eCommerce offering which is in the same report suite, so it might cause issues with that reporting.Thanks,Frank

Another great part of the table builder in Ad-Hoc is the ability to, with one click, switch your metrics and dimensions, in case you want to change your report around. It would be great if this could be added to the Workspace table builder (if/when it happens).

Thanks. That's really helpful.I do still think a simple right click > Rename option would be nice as well.

I've seen, on the Ad-Hoc product/download screen, that there is now a version that can be used with Java 11. Will this version also be killed off or will it continue you work when you end of life Ad hoc?Thanks.

I second this idea. I need to be ale to get a quick monthly view of my server call usage, like int he old billing tab. If this can't be done on screen, at least allow use to have a granularity option when downloading the report so we can see the data in total or monthly.Thanks.

Thank you.

Thanks.When using that segment, I get data back that looks like it could be correct, so I assume it is. I just wanted to make sure the logic I was using for the segment made sense (especially around hit depth).Thanks for your help.Frank