When you share a Proof and you aren't within the Proof itself the settings for Role & Notifications are treated as a "subscriber" even if the recipient is a licensed user with their own defaults setup. Plus, there is no place to change the default for a subscriber so they are ALWAYS Reviewer/No Emai...

True, that is why I would like an option to either retain the reviewers from previous stages, or start from blank each time. We’ve had some terrible mistakes where the wrong people got a proof they shouldn’t have because the designer forgot to delete the list.

Right now when you print a proof, only the pages with comments can print. When you download the original document, the comments are not included. There is no way to print the entire document including the comments. I suggest there be an option to print only the pages with comments, or print the enti...

This would be so helpful for so many reasons I can't even list them here!

I'm not sure what the new update has for formatting, but in the integrated version this isn't possible. It's the #1 complaint I have about ProofHQ that the designer can't copy/paste a comment with the formatting, and are required to find words like [BOLD] and [ITALIC] within lengthy text. We italici...

This is huge I wish I could vote for it 10 times.

Currently, when a version is uploaded, it automatically populates who it will be shared with as everyone who has seen the previous proofs/versions. I would like an admin setting to change the default to "none" so that it doesn't make that assumption, and the person uploading the version has to consi...

Also, I have people filling out the form inside a Task, accidentally, and then nobody can find it, and it can't be moved to the Project level so that it can become visible. Try explaining the difference between a form for Tasks a form for Projects, when they look exactly the same, and the resulting ...

Also, the notification that currently goes out only says the next task is ready to start by ROLE rather than by the actual human who has to do the task, which means everybody who gets that notification ignores it because 1) someone else finished something (who cares?) and 2) it doesn't have their na...

I would add that it should also be a field that can be selected for a report or a column to view which tasks have "work on it" clicked. OR the Task Status changes to a certain identifier based on the "work on it" being clicked.