Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

HowardWi1
HowardWi1
Offline

Badges

Badges
0

Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions
0

Likes Received

Likes Received
69

Posts

Posts
45

Discussions

Discussions
6

Questions

Questions
39

Ideas

Ideas
6

Blog Posts

Blog Posts
0
Top badges earned by HowardWi1
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile
Re: Tag typeahead field type
-WE
- Workfront 12-03-2021
Similar/earlier post of same request: https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSQvAAO/detailAdding commentary with additional context in hopes this thread surfaces in future search results by other users; and will copy it on the other submission.I think "typehead" is a misnomer for what is needed; because what's needed would be a different functionality than the existing typeahead object (limited to one value only). We want the ability to tag keywords or metadata to a wide assortment of obje...

Views

8

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: "EPROTO" error? - Workfront Fusion 2.0 29-12-2020
Thank you for the update.

Views

16

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: "Scenario was Rejected" - Workfront Fusion 2.0 01-12-2020
Hello Howard, I hope you are doing well. It's unlikely you are doing anything wrong. I suggest approaching this as a support issue if a scenario is reject more than once. Please include a link to the scenario and indicate if it is active or one you are currently building so that our support team can prioritize appropriately.

Views

12

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Module to create an Update? - Workfront Fusion 2.0 23-11-2020
Workfront --> Create Record --> Update

Views

9

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: Create Hyperlinks in Fusion - Workfront Fusion 2.0 20-09-2021
@Chloe Rock‚‚ Simply use the Workfront Connector, Record Type = Update, Object Type = (Project / Task etc) - and 'insert' the URL the base URL+ID Here's an example of the update text taking directly from one of our scenarios - {{1.finalURL}} is simply a URL like https://www.myurl.com - WF is clever enough to render this link 'cliclkable' in the update! We're not trying to be clever and have a work hyperlinked - hence no need to worry about wrapping anything with a If your full URL is not avail...

Views

30

Like

1

Replies

0
Form / New Form - Workfront 06-11-2020
Is there a way to have a new, blank form populated of the same type you submit, right after you click the submit button? Rather than taking the user to the requests page that shows existing requests and add some clicks to get a blank?

Views

7

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: AddHours help - Workfront Fusion 2.0 04-11-2020
Hi Howard, I can't really tell from your screenshot. But here is how I would troubleshoot this: Confirm what is coming out of that particular field without any manipulation by removing the "addDays" completely. based upon what value is, determine whether it is actually a date. If it is really a date ...it would show in a UTC format. You could also hover over the column in the mapper to determine the data type (text or date). I suspect the data is literally blank or not actually a date. If it is ...

Views

12

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: Concatenating in 2.0? - Workfront Fusion 2.0 02-11-2020
Hi Howard, This one is deceptively simple. When you are writing any values anywhere in Fusion, you can simply put multiple mapped fields and/or text together and they are all concatenated by default. For example, if you created a new scenario triggered based upon watching for New Workfront Projects. The 2nd module could have a field called "Name and Status" and you can simply use the mapping panel to concatenate the name and the status from the first module. See example screenshot.

Views

9

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Need help using the "contains" function - Workfront Fusion 2.0 03-11-2020
The dreaded SEMI-COLON! Thank you so much for the help.

Views

8

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Webhook "Gateway trigger error" - Workfront Fusion 2.0 30-09-2020
Hi Howard, Unfortunately I am missing enough context to be able to help much more. Based upon everything I can ascertain -- your last screenshot seems accurate. This would be a scenario triggered by something else...then it would make two calls (to some other system entirely)...then respond with some information back to the originating system.

Views

9

Likes

0

Replies

0