Yes. This is the way the functionality is intended to work. It's definitely not a new upgrade. If your reviewer is used to using Proof to leave comments on a video, the Video person should be uploading a file and generating a proof on the file. Sounds like there's been a change in your video team's ...

Sounds like your video person is uploading a vimeo URL for proof, and generating an interactive proof which requires a reviewer to use the desktop proofing viewer. Was this agreed to by your reviewer? Sounds like she is used to people uploading a video FILE, generating a regular proof, and being abl...

I think I understand what you're asking, and I would say this needs to be a calculated field that says not equal or equal, and then you group by the calculated field.

if you read the section more carefully you should discover it’s for anyone. For example, depending where you look: anyone assigned to a task, or anyone with access to the project, etc. It should apply to teams but I will leave it as an exercise to you to test out for yourself. 

I'm not sure if this answers your question -- there is a section called "Access" when you "edit template" -- this controls a few different aspects, including the ability to switch off "delete" for certain user types. Just click on the "manage" or "contribute" words, to see whether you can switch off...

thanks, that's helpful to know. Have you tried exporting your approvals (as a kickstart) and gleaning what you need off the approvers tab? (You didn't mention, but if this is for ongoing maintenance, I would then store the information on each process's description field, so you would only have to go...

You would organize the hierarchy of forms in whichever template you are using to create these projects. Simply edit the template and scroll down to the line that says "Arrange the custom forms in the order that you would like them to appear".

hi, since an approval process can have many approvers, you would need to consider a collection. If you reference the collections documentation on AEL, you'll find the following in the limitations section: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/reporting/reports/text-mode/reference-c...

if you put in a ticket with Support, they can work with you to do this, as well as help you understand how this happens.

I'm wondering if faking it is good enough. Can you put a year on the company object that everyone is in (hopefully you only have the one company) and then create a calculated field that is formatted as a date, and looks at the month and day of the birthday field, adding it to the year of the company...