This isn't a perfect solution and won't work for all possible metrics, but you can create hit-based segments for each metric where the logic is "Metric X exists." You should be able to use occurrences as your metrics. If you want more precision, you can create a calculated metric - add each metric with its corresponding segment.The final table will look like this There are some metrics that this doesn't work for, as mentioned. Visits/Unique visitors is a big one, because those metrics aren't hit...

Yes, I would like to vote for this 1000 times. I rarely want to share segments/calculated metrics with "All" and I absolutely do not want the overhead of creating product profiles for each user group, so I'm stuck manually selecting 25-30 individuals for each share action or just giving up and sharing with "All" - which adds clutter to everyone's experience.

100% seconded. I recall we were promised this functionality before Ad Hoc Analysis was deprecated and it was never delivered.

Thank you @vibhatna, as mentioned I do understand what is happening. I am saying this does not seem like expected (or desired) behavior for a hit-based segment. A hit-based segment should report the same analytics metrics as that dimension itself in a table. I am also asking if there is a solution to report entries/bounce rate for hit segments, given this behavior is not what I need.

Yes, same with sharing components like calculated metrics and segments.It's truly odd for this to be expected behavior, as product profiles should be product-related and user groups should be user-related... There's rarely (if ever?) a case I would want to share something at the product profile level that I wouldn't simply share with "All" - whereas sharing with particular user groups is a weekly-or-more use case. I solve for this with components by creating a workspace, adding all new component...

Oops, I marked your reply as correct.Sort of!At some point in the past 6 months I figured out you can hold ctrl and drag the container down to copy the settings so that makes things slightly easier, I can just ctrl + drag to retain the 'contains' setting and enter the next value.But what I really wanted here is to use the drop-down options that "equals" provides (so I can easily confirm they exist) and then to swap every one en masse to "starts with" or "contains" to ensure my segment (in this c...

I would absolutely love a "delete" feature. I make mistakes pretty much all the time and if it's a shared/repeated data pull that someone else is referencing, it can get so messy indicating which one is the correct version for them to duplicate later on.