Hi Jon, Thank you for your reply and the confirmation. Do you know how Adobe Campaign handles negative workflow id's? As shown in the example, we cannot derive the workflow id from the wkf table name when it's - this is an assumption - negative. Is there a way how AC translates a negative id? Kind r...

Hi @InMo, We have this package already installed and are using the default reports. Sadly we don't have access to all mid-source information. We have created a manual report with daily figures and would now rather know how we should calculate the advised maximum. We always thought it was +20% of the...

Dear Jon, Thanks for your reply. The matrix is really helpful! We found another one, but this one is way more clear. We already have the Hadoop connection in place and it's all working. We are rather exploring ways to improve the use of it, for which our technical guys need more insights. However, n...

Dear @Manoj_Kumar_, Thank you for this tip! I've looked up the documentation about target mapping and found the option to create a new one.I guess it's just changing the e-mail field as shown below, to the new field that we create by extending the data schema of the recipients table.   I guess there...

Hi wodnicki, Based on new offline feedback we got, we concluded that Adobe Campaign is adding "N" in front of the string value before hashing it. It does this for each unicode string. The result is a different hash than expected. What Adobe Campain does:     lower(convert(varchar(64), HashBytes('SHA...

Hi wodnicki, Thanks for your quick reply. I posted new insights about the problem as a separate answer. Wesley