I'd like the ability to edit a custom report from directly within the
report; perhaps something similar to how you can edit a dashboard
reportlet. It would save time, since the current process involves making
changes to the current report, saving it as a new custom report, and
then going into the Admin Console >> Menu Customization section to
delete the old version of the report. Seems like an awful lot of effort,
especially if I just want to change a rolling date setting or filter.
I'm not sure if you are aware of the SAINT FTP feature; it allows you to
select a group of report suites to which it will upload the
classification file. So you could select all report suites and create an
FTP account for that group, then do one upload to that FTP account to
have it process in all report suites. -Jessica
Whenever I need to login to the Online Marketing Suite (see screenshot),
I tab through each of the form fields. However, due to the order of the
login button vs. the "remember my login" checkbox, I have to hit tab to
get past the login button, hit the space key to check the box, and do
SHIFT+Tab to get back to the login button. A simple fix would be to
change the order of these two items on the form. I have to clear my
cookies every few days for testing purposes, so I run into this issue
quite o...
I often run into a situation where I have a segment in Discover that has
many different segment rules built directly into the container (not just
nested elements), and then I realize towards the end that I really
wanted to use a different type of container (e.g. Page View instead of
Visit). It would save a great deal of time and reduce the risk of error
if I could just edit the container type from within the Rule Builder
wizard. For instance, where it says "Name: Visit" when going to edit a
Visi...
Quite often, I am submitting ClientCare tickets (via email) for other
members of my team (at times, up to 10 different people). Whenever I
receive an update from ClientCare, I have to forward ClientCare's email
onto other users to make sure they are constantly in the loop. It would
be great if, whenever I CC others on an email to ClientCare, the system
automatically knows to CC them when the ClientCare member responds.
I completely agree with #1. Sometimes I know there are going to be more
than 50,000 records returned in a report, but I still need to have the
grand total of all records for that variable (without specifying the top
"n" instances), in order to calculate an accurate % of total in an
automated fashion.
When looking at a single date range, using 7/11/2010 - 7/17/2010, I
don't like that when I then select to "Compare Dates" and select the
week prior (7/4/2010 - 7/10/2010), the "Change" column does the
calculation based on OLD minus NEW (i.e. week ending 7/10/2010 minus
week ending 7/17/2010 - see attachment). The only way to get around this
is to move the order of the date ranges to pull the old dates first;
however, this doesn't seem like a great solution, since the report then
shows the older ...
Personally, I think the issue could be solved by tweaking the new
dashboard functionality to have a little more flexibility in terms of
reportlet size. I like that there are now defined regions to drop a
reportlet into, versus the infinite options that existed previously.
However, this also causes inefficient use of space at times, especially
if I have one reportlet that has 10 rows of data (e.g. top 10 products
sold), while another reportlet has only 1 row of information. It would
be great if t...
To expand further on this "time frame granularity" idea, it would be
extremely useful to set alerts to ignore certain hours when setting
hourly alerts. Use Case: If I'm trying to monitor site traffic and
orders by hour to make sure the site doesn't go down, I don't need
alerts sent from 1AM - 5AM when I already know traffic will be minimal.
I would like to see the ability to de-duplicate classification metrics
inside of SiteCatalyst UI and Excel plug-ins, instead of relying on
Discover/Data Warehouse to do so.
I've been told that Discover samples based on complex algorithms.
However, it would be great to know some standard guidelines to minimize
this behavior or the ability to turn off sampling in crucial situations.
There are times when I simply cannot wait on a Data Warehouse request to
get delivered and I need to drill in deep enough in Discover to see what
is impacting specific user types. Sampling throws this analysis off.
