As the link from Sham showed, you don't need to modify sidekick.js. In your JavaScript, add your custom action to CQ.wcm.Sidekick.DEFAULT_ACTIONS.

Hi,A few points to clarify:* TarMK never supported clustering. TarMK is new technology in Oak. I think you are confusing it (for good reason) with TarPM.* S3 cannot be used to host the nodestore, only the datastore. So you still need to use TarMK or MongoMK for the nodestore.* It is not clear to me ...

Hi,This works, but it would be significantly easier to user a higher-level HTTP client API which supports basic authentication.Justin

Hi,Sorry, I don't see anywhere in that page where it suggests that creating a namespace modifies nodes in /libs/dam/options/metadata. You should create a namespace as part of your deployment process, not during a workflow. The most common approach is by using the Sling-Namespaces bundle manifest hea...

Hi,Creating a JCR namespace does not modify nodes under /libs/dam/options/metadata. Where did you read that?Programmatic namespace registration is described in section 10.12 of the JCR spec: http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/10_Writing.html. Also see the JavaDoc: http://www.day.com/maven/jsr170/javad...

bswx wrote... Problem : I want to make some global values available to Javascripts, for example WCMMode is available using CQ.WCM.WCMMode. But these variables will be be coming from various SS objects, configs etc, I want to make that available for client side scripts so they can accessible to perfo...

bswx wrote... Generating script tag is not the problem, but how can we make the selector js.jsp file into clientlib?  You can't. A client library is essentially static. What you want is to dynamically generate JavaScript, which is perfectly fine, just has nothing to do with clientlibs.Your original ...

This article should be updated. There is no longer any reason to make bundles for HttpClient 4.x. Apache distributes an OSGi bundle already.There is an unfortunate bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1547) with the latest release, so you should use 4.3.4 for now.

In a word... no, this isn't a good use of clustering. You can't have a publish and an author in the same cluster - their content will conflict with each other.I'm not sure why you are opposed to using reverse replication, that seems like a natural fit. The way this would work is as follows:1. Extern...

Hi,You can create rep:glob based access control entries using CRXDE Lite.Regards,Justin