Hello Isaac, First of all I am not sure, If I understand your issue right, but why don't you copy the custom data from the request to the new project within the conversion step in your scenario? And where do you want to export the "details present on the project" to? RegardsLars

Hello Tibor, You can use the Filter paremeter to pass JSON as explained here. Your call would look like this:/PROJ/search?filters={"status":["CUR","CPL","QUE","DED"],"status_Mod":"notin","extRefID_Mod":"notnull","enteredByID":["<id>","<id>"],"enteredByID_Mod":"in"}  RegardsLars

Hi @HarishDe, I am not sure, if I understand point 4 in your enumeration right, but in my test scenario the module is working as expected using the above way. The module does remember, which rows have been fetched already and returns only new rowsthrough each subsequent call. RegardsLars

I just tried the module using Choose where to start: specific ID Here I entered the row number of the last existing row. Running the module now returned zero results, as expected, running it again after adding an additional row or additional rows returned that new row(s).

Hi HarishDe,  Google Sheets > Watch Rows returns new rows added after the last time the scenario was run. This should explain how to use it. RegardsLars

Hello NCorver, I think you need to use the corresponding keywords for space and emptystring to make it work.  RegardsLars 

Hi Rob, Unfortunately the possibilities are very limited, as calculated fields can only reference objects found in the References tab of the object in the API Explorer. Starting from a sub-task or "sub-sub-task", you are able to reference the parent task or the main task using  {parent}.{<fieldName>...

Hello Kristen, I am working with the Fusion API without any issues besides the fact, that not everything documented for the make.com API is also valid for Fusion. As we are working on the European servers, our API URL is https://eu.fusion.adobe.com/api/v2/ So, I think you just needto use the followi...

Hello, I just found this discussion. Yesterday I opened this thread, as I do not understand how to use the FORMAT() expression on the new Validation logic functionality. Does anybody see the Formatting Logic option in your instance?I would love to have the possibility to have different stylings for ...

Hello, The Formatting logic option is not displayed for me either. @QuinnCullison What do you mean by "Once it's enabled on your system you should be seeing a "Formatting Logic" option"? Is it something which is not rolled out yet? Thanks in advance. RegardsLars