Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

MikePe
MikePe
Offline

Badges

Badges
0

Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions
0

Likes Received

Likes Received
12

Posts

Posts
61

Discussions

Discussions
13

Questions

Questions
48

Ideas

Ideas
12

Blog Posts

Blog Posts
0
Top badges earned by MikePe
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile
Re: Scorecard for a Request - Workfront 01-10-2020
Thank you Frank -- the Channels field is a single-select dropdown field, so unfortunately it does not appear to have taken the change well (I did give it a shot, as the suggestion was sound!). When I made the change, the value it was displaying for the SMS, SOCIAL and BLOG selections was showing as 0 (I presume because the IF statement was demanding all of the above be selected, but I'm not certain).

Views

53

Likes

0

Replies

3
Re: Scorecard for a Request - Workfront 29-09-2020
Thank you! This is very helpful -- I was able to get my calculated field up and running with a bit of tinkering and you wonderful folks in this thread I am experiencing an unexpected result, however, and I'm not sure if I did something wrong (I'm still learning the ropes on Text Mode). The code attached in the screenshot is giving me a score of 50 when I select SMS, Blog or Social, even though I am attempting to have those equate to a 25... At first, it wasn't giving me a value for Email at all,...

Views

53

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Scorecard for a Request - Workfront 22-09-2020
Hi everyone! I am a bit late to this party, but this thread is describing exactly what we are also looking for at my organization, and I have a few questions for you all... We are using a request queue based process, so, much like you were at the outset of this (I imagine), we are looking at two options: A) changing process to work Business Case/Scorecards into the sponsor's stage of the request, or B) using custom forms as you all have described. Have any of you noticed any limitations compared...

Views

53

Like

1

Replies

2
Re: "Creating a new version of an existing proof requires Edit access" -?? - Workfront 10-01-2020
Thanks Dustin-- well said! Mike Perez

Views

21

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: "Creating a new version of an existing proof requires Edit access" -?? - Workfront 09-01-2020
I just happen to have some documentation ready for this issue, as it has come up for us a few times The system has two requirements to allow users to upload new versions over existing documents they did not upload originally: The first requirement is that the user who is attempting to upload the second version should also have Contribute access to the project. This can be done in the Sharing menu of the project, by clicking on "View" next to the user's name, and changing it to "Contribute" (if t...

Views

21

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Task owners causing issues in reports - Workfront 02-01-2020
If I may, I thought I might add that Assignment Users will show ALL assigned users on the task, including the Task Owner. I only mention this because when I first started using it I thought I needed to filter by both the Assigned To AND Assignment Users to capture every assignee, which isn't the case Mike Perez

Views

36

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Merry Christmas - Workfront 02-01-2020
Belated reply here, but I hope your holidays were fantastic, and the new year is kind to us all (Also, I was curious about Lincolnshire, so I did a quick Google search-- it is beautiful!) Mike Perez

Views

10

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Task Status Change when using "Work on it" Feature - Workfront 26-11-2019
This functionality would help make the Actual Start and Actual Duration fields more reliable as well, since (at least from what I've seen about actual user behavior), users aren't updating their percent complete unless it's 100% because they finished the task, nor are they manually going in and changing the status to In Progress... I hope this can be green-lit sooner than later, as it would help with reporting immensely.

Views

9

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Typeahead fields: how do you plan to use it? - Workfront 21-11-2019
We noticed this too, but after testing it we found that when the form displays on the issue/project after submission, it shows the entire project name. It is mostly just difficult to read at the time of entry, which isn't ideal, but also isn't a deal breaker for us. Our planned uses so far are for references to other projects (in the case of requests where assets are being repurposed from a previous project), as well as allowing the sponsor to select which print producer is working on a given pr...

Views

17

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Updating proof artwork for a sick person - Workfront 19-11-2019
I'm late to the party here, but we just encountered this as well, and I think I might be of some help There are two requirements to achieve what you're looking for. The first, is that the user who is attempting to upload the new version should also have Contribute access to the project. This can be done in the Sharing menu of the project, by clicking on "View" next to the user's name, and changing it to "Contribute", if they aren't already. (I believe this will also work at the document level, b...

Views

25

Likes

0

Replies

0