Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

BrandonNW
BrandonNW
Online

Badges

Badges
34

Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions
1

Likes Received

Likes Received
113

Posts

Posts
208

Discussions

Discussions
25

Questions

Questions
183

Ideas

Ideas
25

Blog Posts

Blog Posts
0
Top badges earned by BrandonNW
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile
Re: How do I allow view project access to all, but limit documents tab access - Workfront 12-03-2019
You could use access levels or layout templates to limit that view, but those both would be universal for that user type and not specific to the staffing on a project. Other than those two methods, I do not believe there is an option to limit document access to project staff only. I'll be interested to see if anyone has found a solution for this scenario. Brandon Pritchard System Administrator iNHouse Marketing - Nationwide pritcb1@nationwide.com

Views

8

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Replies to comments on a Proof - Workfront 07-03-2019
In our instance we have set the "Someone comments on a thread I'm in" option to disabled globally, but left the "Someone includes me on a direct update" option on, therefore the user does not receive every comment, just the ones they are tagged in. Hopefully this can provide a workaround for you.... Brandon Pritchard System Administrator iNHouse Marketing - Nationwide pritcb1@nationwide.com

Views

32

Likes

0

Replies

0
Readability in Proofing Tool - Workfront 06-03-2019
Hello WF friends... Our proofreaders have expressed a need for readability functionality within the proofing tool. I honestly didn't even know that existed until about 5 minutes ago. ‚òª Apparently in Word (and I am assuming some other Microsoft tools), there is a Readability option that will analyze your text and tell you what grade level your documents read out at. Has anyone else's users expressed interest in adding that functionality to the viewer? just curious.... Brandon Pritchard Syst...

Views

7

Likes

0

Replies

0
Doc details in Email notification - Workfront 06-03-2019
I see the new doc details section in the proofing viewer that came with release 19.1, however, I am not seeing the new doc details option in the email notification that was advertised. Can anyone confirm that this option now exists? Is it a permissions issue in the proof workflow I am missing? Is it an access level restriction I have not accounted for? Any insight would be appreciated. • More clarity in your proofing experience - Asked to review content, but you don't know the details of t...

Views

14

Likes

0

Replies

3
Re: Tasks List Update - Workfront 05-03-2019
"List Scrolling - In the new version, the list separates from the page to enter and exit full screen mode when the users scroll up and down. We're working to improve this experience and are looking into ways to scroll the whole page instead of separating the list." I am sure you have heard it 100 times now, but this list separation is killing our PMs. It really just makes the experience hard to manage and ends up being more of a hindrance than benefit. Are there any plans to revert back to the p...

Views

51

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Tying a request/issue to a program? - Workfront 22-02-2019
I am not sure how you have your request queues set up, but technically you could tie that request queue/queue project back to a portfolio and program. When the request is created it is attached to that parent queue project as an issue. Therefore, that issue is tied to the program that the queue project is associated with. Then, to Vic's point, you could filter your view or report to show the issues that are tied to that particular program. This would require your queue projects, topic groups and...

Views

42

Likes

0

Replies

0
Project Completion Survey - Workfront 08-02-2019
Hello friends. I'm curious if any of you send a survey after project completion internally or externally. We are looking to send an automated survey to 1) the PM (planner license) and 2) the client (requestor license) after a project is completed. Does anyone do something similar to this? Can this be done via WF? If not, what service do you use to send the survey and what is the trigger for it? Thanks! Brandon Pritchard System Administrator iNHouse Marketing - Nationwide pritcb1@nationwide.com

Views

11

Likes

0

Replies

2
Responsive View Columns - Workfront 05-02-2019
We would like to see responsive columns for our Project views. Currently, when a user shifts a column or expands the width, it is the only column that responds. It would be great to lock all the columns together to shift them all at once. Let us know if you think you could benefit from this as well!

Views

5

Likes

6

Replies

1
Removed Recipients Decisions Still Captured in Summary - Workfront 05-02-2019
We would like to see the ability added to remove a recipient from a Proof Workflow, yet still have their decisions and comments reflect on the Print Summary. Even with using Locked and Private Stages, there still isn't a way to block the recipients from seeing replies to their comments. Our thought is, if we allow the recipient to comment and make a decision, then remove them from the flow, that would block the recipient from seeing our comments and lock them from making further comments or chan...

Views

4

Like

1

Replies

0
Calculated field for Project Name - Workfront 05-02-2019
We would love to see the functionality added to pre-populate a Project's Name into a calculated field. This would eliminate the need for Project naming conventions and user error when entering a Project's Name. The name would be calculated from the request path with the Issue's Reference Number as the unique identifier. Example: Request Queue = A Topic Queue = BB Queue Topic = CCC If the client chose those options, the project name would auto populate with something like, “REFERENCE ID_A_BB_CCC”...

Views

5

Like

1

Replies

0