Hi @Divya104 , No this way of workflow design is not recommended. It
causes dead lock situations at some point because the scheduler next run
and previous temporary table data are working on same table. Also, your
data will be misinterpreted because of the long wait time and shorter
duration of scheduler.As suggested by @David_Loyd , if it's necessary to
wait for 2 hours, split your workflow in two workflows. Thanks,Jyoti