HI Caden, thanks for the note, though posts like this may be best to review with our fantastic support team. That being said, I'm guessing that the Google account you are using is a "personal Gmail". At this moment personal Gmail accounts cannot be used due to increased privacy restrictions set in ...

Hi Caden, We don't have any built-in ways to chunk a file in Fusion 2.0. I'm curious how large these files are? Much of this will depend on the 3rd party API.

Hi Howard, I can't really tell from your screenshot. But here is how I would troubleshoot this: Confirm what is coming out of that particular field without any manipulation by removing the "addDays" completely. based upon what value is, determine whether it is actually a date. If it is really a d...

Hi Howard, This one is deceptively simple. When you are writing any values anywhere in Fusion, you can simply put multiple mapped fields and/or text together and they are all concatenated by default. For example, if you created a new scenario triggered based upon watching for New Workfront Projec...

Hi Howard, Your variable value is so close! But missing a semicolon. right now your function is something like:{{if(contains(1.`Some Text Value`; "Anniv") + "Anniv Found"; "Anniv Not Found")}} but it should be:{{if(contains(1.`Some Text Value`; "Anniv"); "Anniv Found"; "Anniv Not Found")}} (you can ...

Hi Daniel, Thanks for that note. We are working on some significant updates to our API documentation (you can access a beta version here). I really don't know why the older documentation uses query parameters for PUTs.. It technically works, but that is very "non-standard". I'd even suggest th...

Yes. Chris is accurate. You can do a POST, PUT, or GET against POPT with the proper parameterID (that is the identifier of the specific field).

Hi Rick, If I understand the task at hand properly, the goal is to use Fusion to create a predecessor relationship on a task. If that's correct, here's how that can be achieved. Your instinct about using the Custom API Call module was correct. The only difference is that, instead of creating the...

Hi Howard, Unfortunately I am missing enough context to be able to help much more. Based upon everything I can ascertain -- your last screenshot seems accurate. This would be a scenario triggered by something else...then it would make two calls (to some other system entirely)...then respond with s...

Hi Howard, Anytime you are using a "webhook response", your first step should be a "custom webhook". Thats the thing that is "listening" for an incoming call -- then it will return the response to that calling service. In contrast, the HTTP module you have there is calling outbound to some other s...