Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

perrin_ennen
perrin_ennen
Online

Badges

Badges
20

Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions
13

Likes Received

Likes Received
42

Posts

Posts
46

Discussions

Discussions
2

Questions

Questions
44

Ideas

Ideas
1

Blog Posts

Blog Posts
0
Top badges earned by perrin_ennen
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile
Re: Target Admin API - Update A/B activity api does not make the activity Live. - Adobe Target 21-09-2021
ah okay, that sounds a bit familiar, unfortunately. I also wanted to create and update our experiences via the api. But I also had the problem that it didn't show up in the Adobe Target UI. That was 2 years ago. Hopefully here is still someone who has a solution for this.

Views

197

Likes

0

Replies

0
Re: Auto Target - Multiple Countries - Adobe Target 21-09-2021
Hello @timf43492464 ,in principle you can do this via an A/B experiment. If I would do it via form based experiments - one is enough. About VEC it is also possible with one - but you need also some script logic that maps your hrefs for the image accordingly. Without script I would rather recommend to create separate experiments per language and domain (unless there is a more elegant way in VEC).

Views

199

Like

1

Replies

0
Re: View not displaying in Adobe target VEC - Adobe Target 21-09-2021
Hi @nitishlamba1, Which at.js version are you using? Maybe try the current version. In the last release note there was also something about the problem https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/release-notes/release-notes.html

Views

598

Like

1

Replies

1
Re: Target implementation - Adobe Target 21-09-2021
Hi @Kirti_23 If you enter adobe.target in the console in the browser - does this object exist? In the network tab you can also search for "mbox" - if there is a request at all. If Target has never been running on the domain - I would check in the Target UI in the administration area under Hosts - if your domain has already been listed here.If not, I would click on "Authorize Hosts" in the upper right corner and make sure that "Enable Authorized hosts for content delivery" is disabled. Do you hav...

Views

548

Likes

0

Replies

1
Re: Target Admin API - Update A/B activity api does not make the activity Live. - Adobe Target 21-09-2021
Hi @kashyapmuc,if you get the A/B test via API - does it still say inactive as status? Is it active - just not visible in the UI?

Views

203

Likes

0

Replies

2
Re: at.js inside javascript minified - script license - Adobe Target 14-09-2021
Yes exactly.

Views

352

Likes

0

Replies

1
at.js inside javascript minified - script license - Adobe Target 07-09-2021
Hello, I want to put the code of the at.js in a wrapper. There is custom js like an if query for a consent. Nothing is changed inside the at.js code - only around the outside. Can I minify all this and write the with licenses over it? Example:/** * @License * .. custom code .. * * @License * at.js 2.6.1 | (c) Adobe Systems Incorporated | All rights reserved * zepto.js | (c) 2010-2016 Thomas Fuchs | zeptojs.com/license * * object-assign * (c) Sindre Sorhus * @License MIT */ ... custom code ... at...

Views

375

Likes

0

Replies

3
Re: different behavior of adobe.target.applyOffer 1.x vs 2.x - Adobe Target 31-03-2021
Here is a sample code - which works for me accordingly in at.js 1.x - but not in at.js 2.x. If I would remove the action parameter - then it works accordingly in both. var mbox = 'mboxName'; var selector = document.querySelector('.className'); adobe.target.getOffer({ mbox: mbox, success: function (response) { adobe.target.applyOffer({ mbox: mbox, offer: [{ content: response[0].content, action: 'replaceContent' }], selector: selector }); }, error: function (status, errorMsg) { console.log(status,...

Views

366

Likes

2

Replies

0
Re: different behavior of adobe.target.applyOffer 1.x vs 2.x - Adobe Target 31-03-2021
That the adobe.target.getOffer() and adobe.target.getOffers() are different is clear to me. But the adobe.target.getOffer() at.js 1.x and adobe.target.getOffer() at.js 2.x - should not really change anything. Nevertheless, if I include in the offer Object an also action with "replaceContent" - target replaces the selector only in the at.js 1.x. In at.js 2.x I see also the response - it seems that the adobe.target.applyOffer has a problem with it in at.js 2.x

Views

380

Likes

0

Replies

0
different behavior of adobe.target.applyOffer 1.x vs 2.x - Adobe Target 30-03-2021
The adobe.target.applyOffer function is used inside the adobe.target.getOffer function.In at.js 1.x I could still set e.g. "action" with e.g. "replaceContent" in the offer option. If I try the same with at.js 2.x - it doesn't work. If I remove the "action" - then it also works with the at.js 2.x for me.In source code I also found "replaceContent" with the 2.x - and it should actually work, because the applyOffer function was not changed. Does anyone know the problem? Is it really because of this...

Views

422

Like

1

Replies

4