- Mark as New
- Follow
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report
@William English‚, my only objection to this way of thinking is it shouldn't be necessary to spend thousands of dollars more on Fusion to get‚Ķwait for it‚Ķbasic sequential project numbers. Yes, I'm being a little sarcastic, but it's directed at WF and not you. ![]()
Corporations use numbers, lean towards logic. Financial departments especially. Something so basic not being available has made me the recpient of an eyeroll more times than I can count. Heck, I eyerolled when I learned about it; I honestly thought I misread/misheard. It got added to a list of reasons, pre-launch, that we considered for aborting our Workfront deployment. Yeah that list was long enough where we actually had that discussion.
I upvoted an Idea Exchange a long time ago that would seem to cover most needs, be very flexible, and shouldn't be tough to design a UI for:
https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSAoAAO/detail
Scroll down to my comment for what I think is a fairly robust sequential number handler treated as a special field type.
Views
Replies
Total Likes