Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
BedrockMission!

Learn More

View all

Sign in to view all badges

typology rules

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 2
piyusha55649946
Level 2

Likes

9 likes

Total Posts

8 posts

Correct Reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 1
Applaud 5
View profile

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 2
piyusha55649946
Level 2

Likes

9 likes

Total Posts

8 posts

Correct Reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 1
Applaud 5
View profile
piyusha55649946
Level 2

03-06-2019

If I have applied a typology rule which excludes recipients which are less than 18 yrs old but by applying this rule, the number of recipients are reducing to less than desired number of recipients to whom I need to send the delivery. What should I do to make sure the minimum recipient are still available for delivery without removing the typology rule ?

I believe that adding a filtering rule before typology rule may be an option but the same is being done in typology rule also (adding the filter rule to exclude recipients less than 18 yrs age). So, what could be a probable solution here pls ?

Regards.

Piyush

Replies

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 4
badr_eddine
Level 4

Likes

42 likes

Total Posts

41 posts

Correct Reply

12 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 25
Boost 10
View profile

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 4
badr_eddine
Level 4

Likes

42 likes

Total Posts

41 posts

Correct Reply

12 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 25
Boost 10
View profile
badr_eddine
Level 4

04-06-2019

Hi Piyush,

You didnt check if your typoligy have more conditions ? maybe that why you are excluding more people.

otherwise if you are using a workflow you can add a condition before the delivery.

Regards,

Badr.

Avatar

Avatar
Give Back 10
Employee
craigthonis
Employee

Likes

155 likes

Total Posts

239 posts

Correct Reply

141 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
Give Back
Boost 50
View profile

Avatar
Give Back 10
Employee
craigthonis
Employee

Likes

155 likes

Total Posts

239 posts

Correct Reply

141 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
Give Back
Boost 50
View profile
craigthonis
Employee

04-06-2019

Hi Piyush,

I'd recommend going the same route that Badr mentioned.  Specifically I'd add the filtering logic to a Split activity and ensure that you are displaying the complement.  Then you can review excluded data in the outbound split transition to see why you are removing more recipients than expected and if the data is accurate.

Regards,

Craig

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 2
piyusha55649946
Level 2

Likes

9 likes

Total Posts

8 posts

Correct Reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 1
Applaud 5
View profile

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 2
piyusha55649946
Level 2

Likes

9 likes

Total Posts

8 posts

Correct Reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 1
Applaud 5
View profile
piyusha55649946
Level 2

04-06-2019

Hi,

  What I understood from your suggestion is, remove the 18+ yrs typology rule and use filtering conditions to achieve the target.

Is that correct understanding ?

Regards,

Piyush

Avatar

Avatar
Give Back 10
Employee
craigthonis
Employee

Likes

155 likes

Total Posts

239 posts

Correct Reply

141 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
Give Back
Boost 50
View profile

Avatar
Give Back 10
Employee
craigthonis
Employee

Likes

155 likes

Total Posts

239 posts

Correct Reply

141 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 10
Give Back 5
Give Back 3
Give Back
Boost 50
View profile
craigthonis
Employee

04-06-2019

That would be my recommendation yes.  I find that filtering prior to the delivery allows for more control and easier analysis of the data being excluded versus doing it at the time of delivery within a typology.