Expand my Community achievements bar.

Announcing the launch of new sub-community for Campaign Web UI to cater specifically to the needs of Campaign Web UI users!
SOLVED

Email Delivery: Anti-Spam Checking Filter Implementation Issue

Avatar

Level 3

Hi Team,

 

After the running the following command, we are facing some unexpected output.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

perl spamcheck.pl TestSpamMail.txt


Output must be a handle, a reference or 'self' at /usr/local/share/perl5/XML/Writer.pm line 480.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Do anyone have idea on this?

 

1 Accepted Solution

Avatar

Correct answer by
Community Advisor

Hi,

 

That is unusual. Glancing through this code it looks like the OUTPUT param gets set to STDOUT in spamcheck.pl, though this is fine and works on my test instance.

Maybe try deleting the param or commenting it? Line 93 of spamcheck.pl. Default for XML::Writer is stdout anyway.

 

Thanks,

-Jon

View solution in original post

3 Replies

Avatar

Level 3

@Jonathon_wodnickiHi Mate, do you have any idea on this issue? We have performed all the steps updated on this https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/campaign-classic/using/installing-campaign-classic/additiona.... After updating the required packages/command/rules, output is not the expected one under the OS and adobe campaign.

 

 

Sever level:- Output must be a handle, a reference or 'self' at /usr/local/share/perl5/XML/Writer.pm line 480.

Adobe Campaign:- Under Email Delivery level - DLV-490066 Anti-spam checking failed (command 'perl /usr/local/neolane/nl6/bin/spamcheck.pl "/tmp/tmp2669-0000.mail"').

Avatar

Correct answer by
Community Advisor

Hi,

 

That is unusual. Glancing through this code it looks like the OUTPUT param gets set to STDOUT in spamcheck.pl, though this is fine and works on my test instance.

Maybe try deleting the param or commenting it? Line 93 of spamcheck.pl. Default for XML::Writer is stdout anyway.

 

Thanks,

-Jon