Abobe Campaign - Spam assassin implementation.

[kvthiyaga]

Hi There,

We are integrating Spamassassin with Adobe Campaign.

The rule update command results error in PROD. Same command worked fine in our lower env. Can you pls suggest any miss in our PROD implementation. Thanks.

"sa-update -D --nogpg --install /appl/adobe/nl6/temp/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.4.4.r1873061.tgz"
**********************************************************************************************************************************
Mar 19 03:07:31.675 [115255] dbg: timing: total 76 ms - init: 73 (95.8%), parse: 0.57 (0.8%), extract_message_metadata: 1.00 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.44 (0.6%)
Mar 19 03:07:31.675 [115255] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader=HASH(0x3fb67f0) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0
Mar 19 03:07:31.675 [115255] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check=HASH(0x40e4a20) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0
Mar 19 03:07:31.675 [115255] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre files succeeded, continuing with channel updates
Mar 19 03:07:31.675 [115255] dbg: channel: using --install files /appl/adobe/nl6/temp/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.4.4.r1873061.tgz{,.sha1,.asc}
cannot open /appl/adobe/nl6/temp/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.4.4.r1873061.tgz.sha1

**********************************************************************************************************************************

[Craig_Thonis]

Hi,

If it worked in your lower environment and you were on the same builds of Campaign and Spam Assassin as Production, then I'd make sure you check the security and folder permissions on the Production server as the operator likely doesn't have access to the folder and files required.

Regards,

Craig

[thiagarajanv928]

Thanks Craig.

I verified user\files has enough permission and moreover executing this command with "root" user and getting error.

Any other suggestion for this issue pls?

[kvthiyaga · Accepted solution]

Hi All,

This issue with Spamassassin rule update 3.4.4 version.

Downgrading it to 3.4.0, working fine, so it's live with rules update 3.4.0.

Thanks.

[Sukrity_Wadhwa]

Thanks for the update on your query!

[prathap08]

@kvthiyaga Is the implementation done with LINUX -RHEL- Red hat OS?