Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
BedrockMission!

Learn More

View all

Sign in to view all badges

AAM segment creation based on MCID failing

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 10
Level 5
DarrenBiz
Level 5

Likes

67 likes

Total Posts

205 posts

Correct Reply

37 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 10
Validate 1
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile

Avatar
Validate 10
Level 5
DarrenBiz
Level 5

Likes

67 likes

Total Posts

205 posts

Correct Reply

37 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 10
Validate 1
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile
DarrenBiz
Level 5

02-12-2018

We can create and update segments based on Declared Id fine. We did find an issue (feature?) where a delivery adds a foreign key (@broadLog-id) to the target schema that you have to remove to get Declared Id segment update working. Once you remove that, the Declared Id segment updates fine.

However, we want to also create an identical AAM segment based on MCID for testing, but AC keeps throwing the error:

1637765_pastedImage_3.png

1637767_pastedImage_6.png

There is nothing in any documentation showing how to get MCID segments updating and the datasource just shows the same targeting dimension as the Declared Id segments (Recipient). The only difference in the datasources is the reconciliation key which is [trackingLog/@sourceId] for MCID.

Any ideas how we target for MCID segments?

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 10
Level 5
DarrenBiz
Level 5

Likes

67 likes

Total Posts

205 posts

Correct Reply

37 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 10
Validate 1
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile

Avatar
Validate 10
Level 5
DarrenBiz
Level 5

Likes

67 likes

Total Posts

205 posts

Correct Reply

37 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 10
Validate 1
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile
DarrenBiz
Level 5

03-12-2018

Ok I found the solution. For some reason, this works individually or if you fork the input into each activity instead of running them in series.

It would be great to know why this works and the other doesn't but i suspect it's "working as designed"

1638593_pastedImage_0.png

Answers (0)