hoping to receive some clarity around the differences of using adobe analytics server side forwarding (SSF) to send data into AAM compared to just using the DIL code. Specifically from an ingestion / time proceasing stand point. If I implement SSF will my analytics information reach the AAM servers faster than if I were to use DIL?
main point of consideration is performing same page personalization. Solutions in use for this scenario are adobe analytics, AAM, target and the ID service enabled for sharing segments from AAM to target.
I don't think there is any difference between the two because ultimately data is getting captured in traits and segments. SSF also instantiates audience management module and DIL code also instantiates audience manager.
As per my understanding same page/hit personalization is only possible with audiences created within Target. With AAM -analytics audiences next hit personalization can be done via target. I think DIL code will cost you for additional calls as compared to SSF.