Apologies for a potentially very newbie question. I'm a new business user of Adobe Analytics and just getting to grips with the platform. I'm more of an end user as we have a separate team that develop analytics dashboards etc., but seeking to make sure we're understanding everything we're receiving.
So onto my question: What is a reasonable % of visits to have 'Unspecified' as a traffic source?
At the moment, well over 50% of visits are showing as 'Unspecified' traffic source. Is that reasonable? Or does that indicate some sort of issue in the way traffic sources are being tagged? At the moment when I ask the team they tell me that these are just visits from people either typing the URL directly into the address bar, or using a bookmark. I guess I'm just trying to understand whether I need to delve deeper into this issue as we could be missing some huge insights if we should actually be able to define a traffic source for those visits. This is when looking at data over a month old by the way, as I understand in first 72 hours this can sometimes happen.
For context, it's a very large site for a very well known brand - over 1m visits per month for the particular section of the website in question. Traffic comes from the full range of typical owned and paid channels.
it depends on the type of your site / campaign, marketing channel, campaign, seasonality, etc.
A website only opened for channel partners, the unspecified / bookmark / type, is over 50%, possible
A marketing / ecommerce site, if it's over 50%, and high bounce% or very specific traffic behavior, you may investigate if there is artificial traffic, unless there is offline campaign without tracking code could be implemented
An end-user after-sales website, most traffic comes from like search engine, social media. if over 50% traffic from Direct / Bookmark / unspecified, you may try to filter Internal Traffic.
So, as long as there is no error on setting tracking code / tagging, then it depends...