Referring domain report under traffic sources we see there are wide range of data on Typed/Bookedmarked (39,506 Instances) than other domains like google and internal url's (assume 4000 average instances). As we known that there are few reasons for that too getting wide data on Typed/Bookedmarked as I mentioned below.
When we type our URL directly into their browser
When we book bookmarks our page on your site and references it on later (complete URL with query string)
when the image request is not provided any referrer stuff (on the time of server call)
Apart from all the reason mentioned above, is there any other specific reason to get this kind of wide data on Typed/Bookedmarked? Please clarify with me on this request. Thanks for your time!
I got same issue. Suddenly in the month of October, internal traffic increased drastically and typed/bookmarked referring domain has increased a lot. Also no changes made in processing rules as till previous months everything was good. Were you able to figure out the workaround?
thanks Arun for your assistance. However, we have the full campaign URL with parameters to capture the CPC (cost per click) from the different referrer as shown below. We have seen Typed/Bookmarked takes the huge number as I said earlier. Moreover, when we break down the Typed/Bookmarked with medium report (CPC - evar 43) it has more data and we bit worried about that high numbers due to below concept. We use the metric instance for this report and please find the screenshot for your reference.